- Apr 20, 2006
- 20,020
- 3,473
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
There is no such thing as a pro-abortionist.
There is one thing that a great many people don’t understand about being pro-choice. You do not have to morally agree with abortion to be pro-choice. That is why it is not called pro-abortion. It is an undertstanding that you can’t make that choice for someone else.
This of course isn't actually true. A simple search of google can put the claim that "there is no such thing as a pro-abortionist." to rest.There is no such thing as a pro-abortionist.
There is one thing that a great many people don’t understand about being pro-choice. You do not have to morally agree with abortion to be pro-choice. That is why it is not called pro-abortion. It is an undertstanding that you can’t make that choice for someone else.
You posted an article of one who isnt a Christian. Do you have any evidence of a Christian who is Pro-Abortion?This of course isn't actually true. A simple search of google can put the claim that "there is no such thing as a pro-abortionist." to rest.
Why I Am Pro-Abortion, Not Just Pro-Choice | Free Inquiry
Also, let's just look at the actual definition of pro-abortion in the dictionary: "favoring the legalization of abortion"
Definitions matter, as many proabortion activists will be very specific in their definition of murder and spend enormous amounts of time explaining why abortion isn't in fact murder. Well, if definitions matter, then it looks like JackRT is acutally pro-abortion as it pertains to the actual definition of the term.
That being said, with regards to the OP, I don't actually see the majority of abortion debates centered around whether or not the unborn are human beings. That's basically settled science. Scientifically, we know that a new human being comes into existence at fertilization.
The argument has shifted away from when are the unborn human beings, and shifted towards a philosophical argument of creating a distinction between a human being and a human person, with only the human person possessing moral worth and value. If we can actually fabricate that distinction, then all we need to do is say that a human being is not naturally a human person, but must develop to level X before they are a human person.
Once that fabricated line is established, then people can argue that aborting non human persons is morally acceptable.
There are two ways to answer this. First, I can do what you ask and link you here:You posted an article of one who isnt a Christian. Do you have any evidence of a Christian who is Pro-Abortion?
I'm all for updating and changing the definition if you want, but as of now, that's the actual definition in dictionaries.
Was unaware of this official?? definition..... Which is why I dont like to be grouped with any set of beliefs, nor do I group others.Or, the second way is to again state the actual definition of the actual term proabortion: "favoring the legalization of abortion"
So the second way to answer your question is to allow Christians here on this forum, such as yourself, who are in favor of the legalization of abortion if you are.... in favor of the legalization of abortion... Thus... you are pro-abortion.
I'm all for updating and changing the definition if you want, but as of now, that's the actual definition in dictionaries.
Ok, so you are proabortion!proabortion
/ (ˌprəʊəˈbɔːʃən) /
adjective
in favour of the medical provision of abortion
In other words, legally available. It does not in any way mean the promotion of abortion.
You can use any magical symantics you want if it makes you feel better inside. But words have meaning, words have definitions - it's how we communicate and how we know what things mean when people say them.Was unaware of this official?? definition..... Which is why I dont like to be grouped with any set of beliefs, nor do I group others.
Would you say that "favoring the legalization of abortion" is the same as being against the legalization of the removal of choice?
The definition doesnt really make much sense, in that it implies that it was illegal to begin with.....and now people are adding laws to legalize it.......But isnt it the opposite? There were no laws concerning it.....and now you wish to create laws to force others to do what you believe it right?
Nay, I believe that most desire for this to be handled outside of law, and not legalize anything.......abortion should not be forced on anyone....so why would you say anyone wants to have it in law?
And that is the thing....you believe that everyone should be forced to respect and abide by your opinions.Isn't the term pro-choice just a euphemism for pro-abortion?
In the end its the very same thing imo!
Again, the dictionary definition of pro-abortion = "favoring the legalization of abortion"Therefore, it would be incorrect to call me Pro abortion or for abortion....because I believe in the general freedom of choice. I am against abortion....I just happen to be also against forcing others to do what I believe right. If you are For the forcing of another's will upon you.....then, you are right to try and force your will on others....
I find no fault it anything you say or believe.....Thanks for the conversation.Again, the dictionary definition of pro-abortion = "favoring the legalization of abortion"
Therefore, as you are in favor of abortion being legal because you don't believe any action should be illegal, then you are indeed meeting the definition of someone who is proabortion.
On another note, I'm personally in favor of laws being in place to protect the innocent. And that is what laws against abortion are all about, protecting the most innocent human beings in our nation.
I support laws against driving while drunk because it protects the drunk person from making an unwise choice, and it protects the people he may crash into.
Likewise, I support laws governing the speed at which vehicles can operate. These laws are in place to protect people.
Laws against abortion are not about taking freedom of choice away from people. They are about protecting the most innocent of our nation's children.
So frankly Raymond, unless you're against essentially every law that protects people in our country, you're kind of a hypocrite.
And that is the thing....you believe that everyone should be forced to respect and abide by your opinions.
And it is fine for you to feel this way. But lets say someone disagrees with you and feel that they arent disrespecting life or treating it like garbage? Should they be forced to abide by your beliefs simply because you believe them? And if so.....would you be ok with being forced to do something that you did not want to do, simple because someone else thought it it just to do so?Not all my opinions.
And yes, I believe all people should respect life and not treat it like garbage. Might sound a little bit harsh but that's how I feel.
Raymond, do you think it should be legal for me to kill my neighbor because he keeps allowing his dog to crap in my yard? If not, can you explain why?And it is fine for you to feel this way. But lets say someone disagrees with you and feel that they arent disrespecting life or treating it like garbage? Should they be forced to abide by your beliefs simply because you believe them? And if so.....would you be ok with being forced to do something that you did not want to do, simple because someone else thought it it just to do so?
If you dont mind, then you are right to desire to take away the choices of others while disregarding their feelings about it......because you will only be treating others as you would have them treat you.
And I am doing the same because i desire to be able to act within my own moral standard without fear of having to change them because of the opinion of another.