• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Pro-Abortion?

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
In several threads on this Forum those of us who identify ourselves as being "Pro-Choice" have been accused of in fact being "Pro-Abortion". This term has even been applied to those who have clearly said that while they believe that the final choice should rest with the pregnant women--which could include the choice to carry the fetus to term--they themselves would never have an abortion unless their life or health were at risk or they were a victim of rape or incest.

Exactly how does supporting the right of choice make one "Pro-Abortion"?

If I tell someone that I support their right to help choose the next president of the US, does that make me "Pro-Obama" since that could be their potential choice, or am I simply "Pro-Republican Democracy"?

If I tell someone that I support their right to decide what they want for dinner, does that make me "Pro-Obesity" since their choice could include a fast-food burger and fries?

So, how can some justify the use of the term "Pro-Abortion" to describe those who are not in any way advocating abortion?

Please keep the discussion civil. No name calling or I will ask the mods to close the thread.
 
B

brightmorningstar

Guest
Pro-Abortion?
In several threads on this Forum those of us who identify ourselves as being "Pro-Choice" have been accused of in fact being "Pro-Abortion".
Well it is because if one is for the choice for it to happen the one is pro-abortion.
Pro-life is actually pro-choice, but a different choice altogether in respect of the choice of the mother and father to conceive.
 
If I tell someone that I support their right to help choose the next president of the US, does that make me "Pro-Obama" since that could be their potential choice, or am I simply "Pro-Republican Democracy"?
Interesting point, but would you support the right for someone to choose whether to murder the abortion doctor, and if so would you be complicit?
You see the issue we have is the murder by choice of the unborn, pro-choice isn’t complicit to choice as such, but to murder.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Well it is because if one is for the choice for it to happen the one is pro-abortion.

So supporting the pregnant woman's right to choose automatically makes one Pro-Abortion. Interesting given that the pregnant woamn could also choose to carry the fetus to term (as the vast majority do). Using your reasoning that would mean that those who call themselves Pro-Choice are actually Pro-Life.

BTW, the term "pro" comes from latin and means "in favor of" or "for". I don't know of anyone who considers themselves to be "Pro-Choice" who is "in favor of" abortion. That is simply one of the possible choices. Go back to my Obama example; being "Pro-Republican Democrary" does not equate to being "Pro-Obama" although that would be a possible outcome.

Pro-life is actually pro-choice, but a different choice altogether in respect of the choice of the mother and father to conceive.

People might make a choice to engage in sexual intercourse, but conception is not a choice. Many who would like to conceive don't; some who do not want to conceive do.
 
Interesting point, but would you support the right for someone to choose whether to murder the abortion doctor, and if so would you be complicit?

First, please answer the questions that I asked.

Second, murdering the abortion doctor would be illegal, and the only people who seem to be supporting such views are a tiny handful of people who wrongly call themselves "Pro-Life".

You see the issue we have is the murder by choice of the unborn, pro-choice isn’t complicit to choice as such, but to murder.

We have discussed this before, and you continue to ignore the fact that abortion is not murder because it does not meet the established definition of murder.
 
Upvote 0
B

brightmorningstar

Guest
Archivist,
So supporting the pregnant woman's right
let me stop you there. What right? You cannot question me to respond to your assumption which I reject as false. The issue is whether it is killing the unborn human being or not.
People might make a choice to engage in sexual intercourse, but conception is not a choice. Many who would like to conceive don't; some who do not want to conceive do.
If people choose to have sexual intercourse without contraception then they may well conceive, you pretending they wont doesn’t change reality.
Interesting point, but would you support the right for someone to choose whether to murder the abortion doctor, and if so would you be complicit?
First, please answer the questions that I asked.
People have abortions and people conceive, this is objective reality, whether it is someone’s right to do what is happening is subjective. Please address the objective question put to you.
Second, murdering the abortion doctor would be illegal,
So is abortion in most countries.
iscussed this before, and you continue to ignore the fact that abortion is not murder because it does not meet the established definition of murder.
Ok so this is the issue, dont try and weazle out of it, address it.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
let me stop you there. What right? You cannot question me to respond to your assumption which I reject as false. The issue is whether it is killing the unborn human being or not.

I isn't my concern what you reject as false. The right to privacy is recognized by the US Supreme Court.

If people choose to have sexual intercourse without contraception then they may well conceive, you pretending they wont doesn’t change reality.

You were the one who said that conception is a choice (your exact words were "the choice of the mother and father to conceive." You said it. You are wrong. Conception isn't a choice.

People have abortions and people conceive, this is objective reality, whether it is someone’s right to do what is happening is subjective. Please address the objective question put to you.

You are the one who has yet to address the questions I put forth in the OP:

"If I tell someone that I support their right to help choose the next president of the US, does that make me "Pro-Obama" since that could be their potential choice, or am I simply "Pro-Republican Democracy"?

If I tell someone that I support their right to decide what they want for dinner, does that make me "Pro-Obesity" since their choice could include a fast-food burger and fries?

So, how can some justify the use of the term "Pro-Abortion" to describe those who are not in any way advocating abortion?"

Don't tell me that I need to address the questions put to me when you have yet to address the question I asked.

So is abortion in most countries.

Wrong. Abortion is banned in only seven countries: Chile, El Salvador, Nicaragua, the Dominican Republic, Malta, Uruguay and Vatican City. It is permitted to varying degrees in every other nation.

Ok so this is the issue, dont try and weazle out of it, address it.

"Don't try to weazle out of it" said the person who still has not addressed the questions I posed in the OP. Can you say "double standard"--I must answer your questions but you don't have to answer mine? :doh:

When you address my questions I will address yours.
 
Upvote 0
B

brightmorningstar

Guest

Archivist,
I isn't my concern what you reject as false.
Let me stop you there. Firstly I don’t recognise it as a right, so the answer to your question is that you cannot support what doesn’t exist. Secondly the US Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over me or many others here so what is the point of you citing it?


You were the one who said that conception is a choice (your exact words were "the choice of the mother and father to conceive." You said it. You are wrong. Conception isn't a choice.
Yes if people choose to have sexual intercourse without contraception the resulting conception is what they chose. Come on if someone said to a judge I didn’t choose to get a speeding fine when I broke the speed limit it wont stop them getting a fine nor mean they didn’t break the speed limit. Its reality.

You are the one who has yet to address the questions I put forth in the OP:
You need to get your questions to make sense or people cant address them. Try this one, prove to me you are not who you say your are.


"If I tell someone that I support their right to help choose the next president
Would you support the right of some African countries to kill people for certain sexual acts? I wouldnt. If something is wrong I cant support someone’s right to do what is wrong.

Don't tell me that I need to address the questions put to me when you have yet to address the question I asked.
Ok..


"If I tell someone that I support their right to help choose the next president of the US, does that make me "Pro-Obama" since that could be their potential choice, or am I simply "Pro-Republican Democracy"?
Potentially yes it can make you Pro-Obama and potentially yes it can make you Pro-Republican Democracy. If I was pro-obama and pro-republican I would encourage people to be able to choose them.


Right!

Abortion is banned in only seven countries
Ok so I was right. You have been citing the US but the US is not only not the only country in the world, but I don’t live there!

Now, abortion after 24 weeks is illegal in most countries, or were you only bale to think inside your own US situation?
So, now, if a child is aborted after 21 weeks and you don’t know which country how do you know whether its illegal or not. I know as its against God’s purposes from conception, but you don’t.
When you address my questions I will address yours.
As you see I have addressed your question above, namely yes you may be on both counts, kindly address my question.

 
 
 
 
 


 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Let me stop you there. Firstly I don’t recognise it as a right, so the answer to your question is that you cannot support what doesn’t exist. Secondly the US Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over me or many others here so what is the point of you citing it?

And as I said before, "It isn't my concern what you reject as false." I recognize it as a right because in my country it is. Since you don't bother to indicate where you are located I don't know whether it is or is not in your country. In either event, whether abortion is or is not a right is not the purpose of this thread--stay on topic.

Yes if people choose to have sexual intercourse without contraception the resulting conception is what they chose. Come on if someone said to a judge I didn’t choose to get a speeding fine when I broke the speed limit it wont stop them getting a fine nor mean they didn’t break the speed limit. Its reality.

Again, that isn't what you said in your earlier post. Your exact words were that it is the "choice of the mother and father to conceive". That is incorrect. They may choose to have sex. They do not choose whether to conceive.

You need to get your questions to make sense or people cant address them.
The questions I asked were clear. They make sense:

"If I tell someone that I support their right to help choose the next president of the US, does that make me "Pro-Obama" since that could be their potential choice, or am I simply "Pro-Republican Democracy"?"

"If I tell someone that I support their right to decide what they want for dinner, does that make me "Pro-Obesity" since their choice could include a fast-food burger and fries?"

It is the exact same reasoning that you use when you say that supporting the right to choose equates to being pro-abortion.

Try this one, prove to me you are not who you say your are.

That isn't what either of the questions that I ask say. I am simply showing the falacy of you position that Pro-Choice = Pro-Abortion. It does not.

Would you support the right of some African countries to kill people for certain sexual acts?

No.

I wouldnt. If something is wrong I cant support someone’s right to do what is wrong.

Agreed.

Potentially yes it can make you Pro-Obama and potentially yes it can make you Pro-Republican Democracy. If I was pro-obama and pro-republican I would encourage people to be able to choose them.

But potentially I could be "Pro-Republican Democrary" and "Anti-Obama" (and as a Romney fan, that actually describes my position). It does not automatically flow that being "Pro-Republican Democracy" makes me "Pro-Obama" just as it does not automatically flow that being "Pro-Choice" makes me "Pro-Abortion".

Ok so I was right. You have been citing the US but the US is not only not the only country in the world, but I don’t live there!

But I do. In any event, that isn't the issue in this thread. Stay on topic.

Now, abortion after 24 weeks is illegal in most countries, or were you only bale to think inside your own US situation?

Again, that isn't what you said earlier. I wrote "murdering the abortion doctor would be illegal". You answered "So is abortion in most countries". As I have shown, it is not. Now you are trying to change your earlier statement.

So, now, if a child is aborted after 21 weeks and you don’t know which country how do you know whether its illegal or not.

You have to check the laws of the country in question. In any event this is off topic.

I know as its against God’s purposes from conception, but you don’t.

According to your interpretation of Scripture it is against God's purposes. Again, that isn't the point of this thread. Please stay on topic.

As you see I have addressed your question above, namely yes you may be on both counts, kindly address my question.

Yes, after three posts and demands that I answer your question, you finally answered the rather basic questions that I asked. According to you if I tell someone that I support their right to help choose the next president of the US that make me "Pro-Obama" even though I am not supporting him. Again according to you if I tell someone that I support their right to decide what they want for dinner that make me "Pro-Obesity" since their choice could include fast food even though I personally don't eat fast food.

Interesting. Illogical, but interesting.

Now, to your question which was "Interesting point, but would you support the right for someone to choose whether to murder the abortion doctor, and if so would you be complicit"?

My answer is no, I wouldn't support the right for someone to choose whether to murder the abortion doction. Murder is illegal. I wouldn't support an illegal activity. Abortion, on the other hand, is not illegal in the vast majority of countries and so, except in seven countries where it is absolutely banned, it is not considered murder so long as it meets the requirements of that nation's laws. As I said earlier, the only people who seenm to want to murder abortion doctors are a tiny group of people extremists who claim to be "Pro-Life"
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
B

brightmorningstar

Guest
Archivist,
And as I said before, "It isn't my concern what you reject as false."
Then you know why I wont bother answering it. But when two people have sexual intercourse without contraception they most likely will conceive, so that is not an opinion but fact. You seem to want to hide behind an opinion as though its equal to a fact.
Since you don't bother to indicate where you are located I don't know whether it is or is not in your country.
Since most people in the world are not in the US why would you make the assumption the US law would either apply or be any better than another country’s law?
Again, that isn't what you said in your earlier post. Your exact words were that it is the "choice of the mother and father to conceive". That is incorrect. They may choose to have sex. They do not choose whether to conceive.
It is absolutely correct, if they choose to have unprotected sexual intercourse they are choosing the possibility of the natural result of it, namely conception.

And neither do I support the right for a mother to choose to abort her baby. .. but why not as a matter of interest?
But potentially I could be "Pro-Republican Democrary" and "Anti-Obama"
Yes, so what was the point of your question?
But I do.
But I dont so abortion isnt legal.
You have to check the laws of the country in question. In any event this is off topic.
On the contrary its crucial as to why pro-choice is pro-abortion. If you don’t know the country you dont know the answer to the question I do know the answer to.

According to your interpretation of Scripture it is against God's purposes.
So according to your interpretation abortion is legal in some countries but its not legal in any country according to my interpretation.
My answer is no, I wouldn't support the right for someone to choose whether to murder the abortion doction.
Neither do I support the right of a mother to choose to murder her own baby.
Murder is illegal.
According to my interpretation yes, but not to yours as you defend pro-choice abortion.
Abortion, on the other hand, is not illegal
according to your interpretation perhaps but not according to my interpretation.
As I said earlier, the only people who seenm to want to murder abortion doctors are a tiny group of people extremists who claim to be "Pro-Life"
Ah that is just your opinion. My opinion is the people who defend women aborting their unborn are extremists who claim to be Pro-choice.
 
Upvote 0

mdancin4theLord

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2011
923
42
Arizona
✟1,309.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I would like to address this topic.

First I would like to post a reply from Randy Alcorn in his book,ProLIFE Answers to ProChoice Arguments, by Randy Alcorn

He addresses this like no nothing I have ever heard. I can understand why someone would not want to be called pro-abortion. Abortion is killing and everyone knows that. It is the goal of every abortionist to kill and remove all evidence of life from the womb. So who wants to be associated with something so cruel, so barbaric. But the fact is...if you condone anyone to get an abortion....you are pro-abortion. Here is Randys answer.

“Suppose drug dealing were legalized, as some have advocated. Then suppose you heard someone argue this way for selling cocaine:

I am personally not in favor of drug dealing, but this is a matter for a drug dealer to decide between himself and his attorney. Lots of religious people are against drug dealing, but they have no right to force the anti-cocaine morality on others. We don’t want to go back to the days when drug dealing was done in back alleys and people died from poorly mixed cocaine, and when only rich people could get drugs and poor people couldn’t. It’s better now that qualified drug dealers can safely give cocaine to children. I personally wouldn’t buy drugs, so I’m not pro-drugs, you understand, I’m just pro-choice about drug dealing.


In terms of moral impact, there is NO significant moral difference between people who are in favor of drug dealing and people who don’t like it personally but believe it should be legal. Someone who is pro-choice about rape might argue that this is not the same as being pro-rape. But what is the real difference? Wouldn’t being pro-choice about rape allow and effectively promote the legitimacy of rape?


Those who were pro-choice about slavery fancied that their moral position was sound if they didn’t own slaves. Yet it was not just the proslavery position but the pro-choice about slavery position, that resulted in the exploitation, beatings and deaths of innocent people in this country. Similarly most people in Germany did not favor the killing of Jews, but they did nothing to stop that killing.


Some people have the illusion that being personally opposed to abortion while believing others should be free to choose it is some kind of compromise between the pro-abortion and pro-life positions. It is not. Pro-choice people vote the same as pro-abortion people. Both oppose legal protection for the innocent unborn. Both are willing for children to die by abortion and must take responsibility for the killing of those babies even if they do not participate directly. To the baby who dies it makes no difference whether those who refuse to protect her were pro-abortion or merely pro-choice.”


If abortion doesn’t kill children, why would someone be opposed to it? If it does kill children, why would someone defend another’s right to do it?


Being personally against abortion but favoring another’s right to abortion is self-contradictory and morally baffling. It’s like saying, “I’m against child abuse, but I defend my neighbors right to beat his children, if that is his choice.” Or “I am against genocide but if others want to kill off an entire race, that’s none of my business.”


People like yourself say, don’t call me pro-abortion, I am not pro-abortion, I am pro-choice. My question to you would be then, why are you opposed to being called pro-abortion? Is there something wrong with abortion?


I think Randy hit the nail on the head.
 
Upvote 0

NDNgirl4ever

LPN, Vegan Hippie Freak, and Tony Orlando and Dawn
Sep 12, 2004
639
57
38
Florida
Visit site
✟23,598.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
My question to you would be then, why are you opposed to being called pro-abortion?
Because the term "pro-abortion" implies that a person believes that all pregnancies should end in abortion. I do not believe that, nor does any other pro-choice person that I've met. Therefore, the term pro-abortion doesn't apply. If you think that all pro-choice people hate babies and children, please answer these questions:

How do you explain the fact that many Planned Parenthood offices offer pre-natal care to women who want to carry their pregnancies to term?

Why did the American College of Nurse-Midwives release a offical statement saying that they OPPOSE efforts to overturn Roe vs. Wade and would allow midwives to perform abortions? Note: the ACNM does not currently include abortion in midwifery training and only two states allow non-physicians to perform the procedures. Midwives in those states have to undergo independent training if they wish to offer abortion services.
Here are two documents from the ACNM's site explaining their position:
ACNM abortion info link
ACNM reproductive choices statement

Lastly, how come many, many people who work in abortion clinics have children and grandchildren?

Is there something wrong with abortion?
Nope, but I don't believe that there is anything wrong with giving birth either. Therefore, I am not pro-abortion.
 
Upvote 0
B

brightmorningstar

Guest
NDNgirsl4ever,
Because the term "pro-abortion" implies that a person believes that all pregnancies should end in abortion.
to those who are pro-choice but not to those who are pro-life. Is it that there is an objection created by the person feeling aggrieved?
If you think that all pro-choice people hate babies and children, please answer these questions:
Well they do if they are prepared to give the mother the right to kill her own unborn baby.

How do you explain the fact that many Planned Parenthood offices offer pre-natal care to women who want to carry their pregnancies to term?
How can you justify that when unborn babies are being killed?
The woman in charge of the UK equivalent providing abortion recently objected to independent as vindictive. Sorry I dont do liberal.

Why did the American College of Nurse-Midwives release a offical statement saying that they OPPOSE efforts to overturn Roe vs. Wade and would allow midwives to perform abortions?
Because they seem unaware of reality? A law can be put in place to make it illegal for midwives to do abortions.
 
Upvote 0

mdancin4theLord

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2011
923
42
Arizona
✟1,309.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
NDNgirl4ever said, "Because the term "pro-abortion" implies that a person believes that all pregnancies should end in abortion. I do not believe that, nor does any other pro-choice person that I've met. Therefore, the term pro-abortion doesn't apply."

Not so...they believe that IF A WOMAN WANTS TO KILL...SHE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TOO. That is pro-abortion. The term fits...

If they put this to a nationwide vote....and you went to the polls and could pull one of two levers....
#1 is pro-life, abortion only to save the life of the mother
#2 pro-choice...abortion on demand for whatever reason

Which one is pro-abortion? Which one defends the life in the womb?

You cant sit the fence and candycoat what this is.....abortion is killing, premeditated killing...paying someone to kill. If you are pro-choice, then you believe a woman has the right to do this.


"If you think that all pro-choice people hate babies and children, please answer these questions:"


I never said they hated babies and children. But who could condone such a slaughter as abortion......what kind of a person?

"How do you explain the fact that many Planned Parenthood offices offer pre-natal care to women who want to carry their pregnancies to term?"



Planned Parenthood is an abortion mill. If you are pro-life, why support a place such as this? I mean come on. They kill babies and the people what work their making a living doing this. It outweighs whatever else they do. They also target blacks as most PP are in lower income neighborhoods. You never see PP offices next to Saks Fifth Avenue stores do you?


Black Genocide: Planned Parenthood's Evil Roots

They do underhanded things......covering up for minor children, selling fetal body parts etc....

Why as a Christian woman would I want to give one dime to a place that dismembers human children alive?


"Why did the American College of Nurse-Midwives release a offical statement saying that they OPPOSE efforts to overturn Roe vs. Wade and would allow midwives to perform abortions? Note: the ACNM does not currently include abortion in midwifery training and only two states allow non-physicians to perform the procedures. Midwives in those states have to undergo independent training if they wish to offer abortion services."



Well of course they want to get into the business. LOL........there is a lot of money in abortion. LOL I mean geeze oh petes. LOL
Are they a Christian group? If they are not then why should we not be surprised that another humanist group believes this way.

You have no idea how dangerous abortion can be. Read the book LIME5 by Mark Crutcher. You have no idea the botched abortions, the deaths that happen each year that are covered up. You don't hear about them, because they rarely make the paper. What family wants the details of this in the paper. Doctors do anything to settle before going to court so they can avoide damaging their reputations...and business. And families don't want people to find out. Most deaths occur because of anesthetic. Most clinics do NOT have on staff doctors who are trained in administering this. The safety argument is a fraud. Most PP clinics do NOT EVEN MEET MINIMUM SAFETY REQUIREMENTS.

This is what the National Abortion Federation says,
"While it is true that NAF publishes standards for the operation of abortion clinics, they openly admit that there is no way of enforcing them, even within their own membership."




Suzanne Poppema, head of NAF’s Clinical Guidelines Committee, even admits that NAF
The clinics are not all monitored.

Warren Hern who is a NAF Board member, former head of its Clinical Guidelines Committee and author of the book Abortion Practice-helped write NAF’s abortion standards, but now calls them “ornamental,” cosmetic,” and “meaningless"

He also says that NAF “has never pursued a serious program of standards implementation and program evaluation,” adding that, “Following good standards costs money. And people don’t want to do that.” He also points out in his book that NAF has never implemented a system to monitor whether its facilities are following its standards.[/font]

All quotes from The American Medical News, “Claiming Abortion Malpractice,” By Diane Gianelli, 2/6/95[/font]


CBS did a news show (60 Minutes) about a Maryland abortion clinic that had killed two woman in botched abortions. They interviewed a woman by the name of Barbara Radford who at the time was executive director of NAF. They asked her in an unbelievable interview if she knew of the problems at the clinic. She responded that she was indeed aware of them but had decided to remain silent because, “This is the last thing we need. We had hoped that it wouldn’t get national publicity because of the political nature of all this.”


In the same program 60 Minute reporter, Marilyn Viero, pointed out that even though these laws could make clinics safer, abortion advocates fight them. That was backed up by then pro-choice State Senator Mary Boergers. She said, “There’s only so much of a willingness to try to push a group like the pro-choice movement to do what I think is the responsible thing to do because they then treat you as if you’re the enemy. We want women to make sure that women have choices when it comes to abortion services, and if you regulate it too strictly, you then deny women the access to service.”

CBS News, 60 Minutes, 4/21/91

In Crutchers book....he documents thousands of abortion deaths....thousands with case numbers and verification information. He documents PP clinics that have been closed because the standards are so low.

Here is a sample.

On June 14, 1977, “Barbaralee had an abortion performed by John Roe 781. After the procedure, she was noted to be pale and complaining of lower abdominal cramping, so she was kept at the clinic for an additional two hours. When she was dismissed, her sister helped her, weak and bleeding, to her car, where she lay in the back seat during the trip home. Several hours later, she was found unconscious in her bedroom and was rushed to the hospital. She was pronounced death on arrival. An autopsy showed a badly torn uterus, a damaged ureter and a large amount of blood in the pelvic cavity. The face and spinal column of her fetus were embedded in a hematoma inside her uterus. A subsequent investigation noted that although vital signs taken 45 minutes after the abortion showed signs of internal hemorrhage, Barbaralee was not examined again before being discharged. She was 18 years old at the time of her death, and had been referred to this National Abortion Federation member clinic by a local women’s group.

Perry County (IL) Coroners Report 6/20/77; Chicago Tribune 8/31/77; CDC Abortion surveillance Annual Summary 1977; St. Louis Post Dispatch 6/15/79





"Lastly, how come many, many people who work in abortion clinics have children and grandchildren?


Nope, but I don't believe that there is anything wrong with giving birth either. Therefore, I am not pro-abortion."


If you condone anyone to kill to solve a problem, if you want abortion legal....you are pro-abortion. But I know why you don't like the term......does not speak well...for the person who believes it.
How could you be pro-life? You cant....not and believe both sides.

And yes I did read the sites you gave about Midwives.

They believe care should respect human dignity. LOL Now they want to perform abortions. Oh yes this really respects the life in the womb doesn't it.

They also say they respect the basic human rights of all people.....All does not include the unborn child.
 
Upvote 0

ajunkyarddog

Newbie
Apr 17, 2011
136
12
Florida
✟22,849.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
All of your sources are nearly over 20 years old. Is that the best you can do? Things don't change in 20 years?

What are you taking issue with so I can look up something current for you? Or are you just being catty and picking and choosing what small thing to complain about in her argument?
 
Upvote 0
A

AllieBaba2012

Guest
So supporting the pregnant woman's right to choose automatically makes one Pro-Abortion. Interesting given that the pregnant woamn could also choose to carry the fetus to term (as the vast majority do). Using your reasoning that would mean that those who call themselves Pro-Choice are actually Pro-Life.

BTW, the term "pro" comes from latin and means "in favor of" or "for". I don't know of anyone who considers themselves to be "Pro-Choice" who is "in favor of" abortion. That is simply one of the possible choices. Go back to my Obama example; being "Pro-Republican Democrary" does not equate to being "Pro-Obama" although that would be a possible outcome.



People might make a choice to engage in sexual intercourse, but conception is not a choice. Many who would like to conceive don't; some who do not want to conceive do.
 


First, please answer the questions that I asked.

Second, murdering the abortion doctor would be illegal, and the only people who seem to be supporting such views are a tiny handful of people who wrongly call themselves "Pro-Life".



We have discussed this before, and you continue to ignore the fact that abortion is not murder because it does not meet the established definition of murder.

Of course it's murder. Just as it's murder to kill a 2 year old child while beating it..though technically, it's called manslaughter.

Pro-abortionists make this argument all the time. "Really, we're pro LIFE!" No, you are not. You advocate for the butchery and disposal of human beings at the most vulnerable stage of their lives....lives which begin at conception. The same people usually advocate for the murder and disposal of coma patients as well, and after you scratch the surface, you find that they also believe that imperfect children should be put out of their misery, and old people should die peacefully and unobtrusively out of sight, and mentally ill people should be helped out of their misery by accomodating doctors and stressed out family.

Abortion is the killing of a human being in the fetal stage. You can't support the right to kill and be "pro-life", and you are lying when you say you can.
 
Upvote 0

mdancin4theLord

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2011
923
42
Arizona
✟1,309.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What are you taking issue with so I can look up something current for you? Or are you just being catty and picking and choosing what small thing to complain about in her argument?


It wouldnt matter.....she is pro-abortion and nothing will change.

She chooses to close her mind to any truth that is out there.

I posted the truth.......and I gave great examples.

Here is another one more recent coverup.

Lila Rose Lays Out the Case Against Planned Parenthood on "The Factor" - YouTube

Investigation of medical lies and manipulation at Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin - YouTube

Planned Parenthood Lies About Abortion Images (censored by YouTube) - YouTube

You tube wont even show them. And PP says they are not babies. yea right.

Planned Parenthood cheats taxpayers with imaginary mammograms - YouTube

They lie........they manipulate.....and they are there to make money on killing babies.
 
Upvote 0

mdancin4theLord

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2011
923
42
Arizona
✟1,309.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Of course it's murder. Just as it's murder to kill a 2 year old child while beating it..though technically, it's called manslaughter.

Pro-abortionists make this argument all the time. "Really, we're pro LIFE!" No, you are not. You advocate for the butchery and disposal of human beings at the most vulnerable stage of their lives....lives which begin at conception. The same people usually advocate for the murder and disposal of coma patients as well, and after you scratch the surface, you find that they also believe that imperfect children should be put out of their misery, and old people should die peacefully and unobtrusively out of sight, and mentally ill people should be helped out of their misery by accomodating doctors and stressed out family.

Abortion is the killing of a human being in the fetal stage. You can't support the right to kill and be "pro-life", and you are lying when you say you can.

GOD BLESS YOU ALLIE
 
Upvote 0

lux et lex

light and law
Jan 8, 2009
3,457
168
✟27,029.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
What are you taking issue with so I can look up something current for you? Or are you just being catty and picking and choosing what small thing to complain about in her argument?

The entire premise. If I quoted the following as a reason why you shouldn't eat at Jack in the Box...what would you say?

"
In tracing the outbreak in Washington to suspect patties at Jack in the Box units, state health officials said the chain's cooks were observed violating an 8-month-old state requirement that hamburgers be cooked to a minimum temperature of 155 degrees. The minimum was raised from 140 degrees last year because of a similar but smaller outbreak of illnesses.
"While the Washington state health department recently, and we think appropriately, upgraded their temperature regulations for hamburger, it is clear that Jack in the Box was not properly informed of this change," Nugent asserted during a Seattle press conference." --Feb 1, 1993 CBS
 
Upvote 0

mdancin4theLord

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2011
923
42
Arizona
✟1,309.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I am NOT pro-abortion, I am PRO CHOICE. Get it right!


Your mistaken again.

Among pro-abortion people you think you are all pro-life......certainly not pro-abortion, that sounds to inhumane....even if you only defend the children who dont have a bulls eyes written all over their foreheads you are pro-abortion.

I have worked in this field for over eleven years traveling around the country....conventions, fairs, universitites, colleges....etc.

We define your stance as PRO-ABORTION whether you like it or not.

Entire books are written about people who think they are not pro-abortion.

Do you believe that woman should have the right to kill by abortion or not?

If you do.........is that a pro-or a con for the child who you are condoning to get dismemebered?

I would say it is a PRO............PRO-ABORTION.
 
Upvote 0