Primordial Soup Based Origin of Life

[Heissonear]

http://www.geochemsoc.org/programs/goldschmidtconference/

1) According to Naturalists (and the subgroup, Evolutionists): how did life start on earth?

2) According to Naturalists: what were the physio-chemical-biochemical conditions that led to the origin of life on earth?

3) According to Naturalists: when did earth provide these conditions?

4) What evidence do Evolutionists provide to prove their Primordial Soup Theory is evidence based?

At the 2013 Goldschmidt Conference on geochemistry last week in Florence, Italy, this subject was presented.

One paper presented was: PNAS | Mobile

 

[Subduction Zone]

Abiogenesis is still in the hypothesis stage. Enough answers are not known yet to properly call it a theory.

If you want to see a simple video that shows what is generally agreed on here you go:

The Origin of Life - Abiogenesis - Dr. Jack Szostak - YouTube

 

[Cheeky Monkey]

Goldschmidt Conference :: Geochemical Society

1) According to Naturalists (and the subgroup, Evolutionists): how did life start on earth?

2) According to Naturalists: what were the physio-chemical-biochemical conditions that led to the origin of life on earth?

3) According to Naturalists: when did earth provide these conditions?

4) What evidence do Evolutionists provide to prove their Primordial Soup Theory is evidence based?

At the 2013 Goldschmidt Conference on geochemistry last week in Florence, Italy, this subject was presented.

One paper presented was: PNAS | Mobile

1) 2) 3) Dunno.(four is just a strawman) Of course the only way to eventually get reliable answers to these questions is using science.




...aren't "naturalists" those folk who wear no clothes? Or is that naturists? Why do creationists keep coming up with silly names for ordinary folk? My mechanic is a "naturalist", at least he has never so far put any if my car trouble down to supernatural agents.

 

[Heissonear]

The questions in the OP are simple. Do Evolutionists have evidence of how life started on earth?

 

[bhsmte]

The questions in the OP are simple. Do Evolutionists have evidence of how life started on earth?

If you are lucky enough, you may be around for when science answers your question with verifiable evidence, as science has done in so many other areas over the last 100 years.

 

[Heissonear]

If you are lucky enough, you may be around for when science answers your question with verifiable evidence, as science has done in so many other areas over the last 100 years.

Do you believe in evolution but have no evidence of its fundamental origin on earth?

 

[CabVet]

The questions in the OP are simple. Do Evolutionists have evidence of how life started on earth?

No. Good enough answer for you?

 

[CabVet]

Do you believe in evolution but have no evidence of its fundamental origin on earth?

Evolution has nothing to do with how life originated.

 

[Cheeky Monkey]

The questions in the OP are simple. Do Evolutionists have evidence of how life started on earth?

Some but not a lot at this stage. That's worlds ahead of creationists though.

 

[Cheeky Monkey]

Do you believe in evolution but have no evidence of its fundamental origin on earth?

I accept the theory of evolution because it explains observed testable facts well.

 

[Loudmouth]

The questions in the OP are simple. Do Evolutionists have evidence of how life started on earth?

Do chemists have evidence of the ultimate origin of matter? If not, then how can they describe how chemicals change over time? Oh wait, you don't need to know the ultimate origin of matter in order to understand how matter changes over time, now do you? So why is biology any different?

 

[Heissonear]

Eolution has nothing to do with how life originated.

Your very foundation to life on earth - and your empty handed. This is your foundation and starting point.

 

[Loudmouth]

Do you believe in evolution but have no evidence of its fundamental origin on earth?

Do you accept chemistry as a natural science?

 

[Loudmouth]

Your very foundation to life on earth - and your empty handed. This is your foundation and starting point.

So do we have to know the ultimate origin of matter in order to understand how matter changes over time once it was here?

 

[CabVet]

Your very foundation to life on earth - and your empty handed. This is your foundation and starting point.

Evolution has nothing to do with how life started on earth.

 

[Heissonear]

Loudmouth and Cabvet,

You are dacing around the simple question. Do you have evidence of the how life started on earth?

How did complex biological active molecules "arrange themselves" into RNA and DNA?

 

[bhsmte]

Loudmouth and Cabvet,

You are dacing around the simple question. Do you have evidence of the how life started on earth?

How did complex biological active molecules "arrange themselves" into RNA and DNA?

Can you read?

 

[Heissonear]

Can you read?

Do you really have no starting point? You have to guess on even the most basic evidence?

 

[BarryDesborough]

Loudmouth and Cabvet,

You are dacing around the simple question. Do you have evidence of the how life started on earth?

How did complex biological active molecules "arrange themselves" into RNA and DNA?

Chemistry.

 

[CabVet]

Loudmouth and Cabvet,

You are dacing around the simple question. Do you have evidence of the how life started on earth?

How did complex biological active molecules "arrange themselves" into RNA and DNA?

Evolution has nothing to do with how life started on earth.

P.S.: I am not getting around anything. Here is my answer to the question.