Micro-evolution and Marco-evolution. Micro-evolution is a species adapting but not changing outside its own species, for example, the different breed of dogs. There all still dogs, just different types of them. Marco-evolution is all species evolving from the same ancestor, this is commonly referred to as classic evolution because this type of evolution is what most people relate to when talking about evolution. The bible very clearly states that animals vary within their species. In Genesis, or all throughout the bible, it commonly refers to animals "after their kind." In the Genesis account of creation after each animal is stated God states "after their kind" implying that species have differences, but always WITHIN the species, never outside. God said that He created male and female and the great sea creatures and made the animals, but "AFTER THEIR KIND". When Noah put all the animals on the ark God commanded him to put "one of very kind." The bible fully acknowledges micro-evolution (adapting within species) but NEVER acknowledges marco-evolution as all animals from a single particle or cell. Micro-evolution is confirmed biblically, and thats the one type of evolution we can tract, and study, because its observable and testable. Marco-evolution (everything evolving from a common ancestor) is NOT confirmed biblically and its not observable or testable. This is why its still called the "Theory" of evolution. One last thought: Many people find it difficult to believe that all of man came from two people. Well, it takes much more faith to believe that EVERYTHING we see today is a result of random mutation from one single cell. Everything from jellyfish to lions to honeybees to centipedes, to bears to zebras. From every type of tree to bateria to virus' to algae, ect from a ONE thing. EVERYTHING. Theres a fossil out that is named Archaeopteryx, it is a fossil with both reptile and bird features. This is shown has the best evidence of evolution. But lets look. It has wings of a bird, it has a feathered tail of a bird, but also jaws with teeth, not a beak. The fossil seems to have both bird and reptile. In the 11th chapter of Leviticus it describes a list of clean or unclean animals, some versions say pure and impure animals. In Lev 11:18 they are describing birds, the name 'tinshemet' is used. Yet 12 verses later they are talking about reptiles, and again, the name 'tinshemet' is used again. This is the only place in the bible that calls something by BOTH species. It's odd that in the fossil record there is ONE fossil that is classified as both a bird and reptile, and in the bible, we find the exact same thing.