- Feb 25, 2008
- 9,692
- 5,020
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Provide a verbatim quote of a recognized amil author supporting your claim.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The AC is not a dispensational issue. All 4 views have this error. All demand a human AC at a time of trouble.
Depends on if you think it already happened or not, no?
Unless you bear the burden of a futurist, is it not all over, now, and you missed the boat? Or are you a partial futurist?
Where in Scripture does it state, "we even have to invent something", once God declares it is finished?The problem that it did not happen to be global or too literal is not the "preterist problem".
Its your problem, because you expect something that did not happen in history, but should. Jews also expected the coming of the Messiah to look differently. And then they had to invent judaism to somehow continue in their religion after the temple was destroyed and prophets ceased to exist. So some Christians invented futurism.
A preterist may not know every detail who was who and how it exactly happened, but simply trusts the words of the Bible that it somehow happened. And some events are possible to be identified even after two millenia, because they were so significant.
But Israel did not become a Nation and rule over all the other Nations soon. They should be the ones complaining, not the Redeemed.But Bible says it will happen soon, not 2,000 years later. Thats the main problem of futurism.
Futurist point out the end of Adam's sin nature and death. What does eternity have to do with that?Even in the futurist paradigm, the New Heavens and Earth abide for eternity, so whatever "end" they "demand" is still future, is clearly not the "end of all things" either, is it?
Seems that problem exists for futurists too...
Or, maybe it's different when futurists do it?
No, it was only impossible prior to the Cross. What Scripture equates the Cross with the GWT?Plenty of resonable people, futurists even, believe People (Christians) go to Heaven when they die today, which would be impossible until AFTER the GWT Judgment.
So you think God was perfectly OK with the Jews murdering his son? Let me show you how angry he was over this.How can God coming to earth for our redemption be an abomination? That is really twisting Scripture into a pretzel.
I'm redeemed by the blood of the lamb right now, my death has nothing to do with my redemption.Which was before the creation of the earth, so the Second Coming was in Genesis 1:1. Except Jesus was talking about a future event before the Cross happened.
The Cross was the day of Redemption. Not everyone has died yet. Until that last person dies, death has not been defeated. It takes more than two verses to make a point.
How do you reconcile 10k, when John defines 144k? Are they the same set, or a different set?
Are you agreeing then that 70AD was not an end? It would only be an end to a dispensation or age at best. Except that end was at the Cross in 30AD. There was definitely an end to millions of humans in 70AD.The two accounts in Matthew 24 and Luke 21 differ from one another.
Matthew 24: compresses the Israel event (AD70) with the end of time event.
Luke 21: has the two events separated from one another.
Many people only read Matthew 24 and think there is just one final event, the end of all things.
Yet Luke 21 has the end of theocratic Israel, then the age of the Gentiles, concluding with the end of all things.
The two accounts are very different from one another and few notice the difference.
Because it’s not biblical.Because the popes were not actual antichrist?
Except that was a parable. God Himself was the Lamb. What part of God's plan do you disagree with?So you think God was perfectly OK with the Jews murdering his son? Let me show you how angry he was over this.
Mat 21:39 And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him.
Mat 21:40 When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?
Mat 21:41 They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.
I'm sure that doesn't compare to how angry God will be when "The Antichrist" sacrifices a pig on the alter of temple that blasphemes the sacrifice of His son's blood.
I can easily refute that claim.Neither are post Millennium teachings.
I do not agree with youEternity "now" is not the Biblical eternity, or you would have proved that with Scripture. We have not even reached the end of Daniel's 70th week. That has to happen before the Millennial Kingdom, and then the NHNE is still not eternity. Eternity is outside of creation.
Its your opinion, nothing factual we could discuss...Where in Scripture does it state, "we even have to invent something", once God declares it is finished?
The fact it is not finished, is why even Peterist have to invent a theory. When God is finished, no one will be left guessing, "What's next?".
You are taking prophecies too literally. Thats why it will be still future for you, even after a million years.But Israel did not become a Nation and rule over all the other Nations soon. They should be the ones complaining, not the Redeemed.
The church never ruled over the unsaved either, so they have really done a bang up job as well.
That it has not happened yet, is the only reason it is still future.
Because the popes were not actual antichrist?
Futurist point out the end of Adam's sin nature and death. What does eternity have to do with that?
No, it was only impossible prior to the Cross.
None. that's my point. Why do you imply the results of the GWTJ were available to the Christian at the Cross?What Scripture equates the Cross with the GWT?
It is called Paradise, heaven is the firmament. It is spiritual blindness that is yet to be removed as well, not just a kingdom.
But Israel did not become a Nation and rule over all the other Nations soon.
The church never ruled over the unsaved either, so they have really done a bang up job as well.
That it has not happened yet, is the only reason it is still future.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?