Berean777
Servant of Christ Jesus. Stellar Son.
I totally agree as does the Westminster Confession of Faith.
This is and always has been the so called Reformed position.
Any representation of the Reformed (or most Calvinist's) position which presents their position on predestination in a way that there is talk of robot and computers is to misrepresent the position of a fellow Christian.
In so far as man always falling in line with His will (or not) - this obvious situation is why any systematic theology in history worth it's salt presents the will of God in an "absolute" and a "permissive" way.
(Most such systematic theologies are written from a generally Reformed position by the way - and there's good reason for that.)
You are quite right when you say:
"God's experience of humanity is not one that is static, whereby God doesn't see man as an independent thinker, rather God thinks of man as just a robot driven by him as pieces in a chest piece. God experiences humanity dynamically, whereby God sees man as an independent thinker and one who can oppose his will, if so he wishes. From the above two scenarios, the latter is purpose built for God to experience man and one that sees man interact with his creator, regardless of indifference in power."
God has said that He purposefully intends that this "dialog" and responses by both parties be part of how He brings His absolute will to past. It is - in the words of the WCF - one of God's "second causes".
The Reformed teaching on those concepts follow in an excerpt that I repeat here - taken from a previous post.
Westminister Confession of Faith
Chapter 5 of Providence
V. The most wise, righteous, and gracious God does oftentimes leave, for a season, His own children to manifold temptations, and the corruption of their own hearts, to chastise them for their former sins, or to discover unto them the hidden strength of corruption and deceitfulness of their hearts, that they may be humbled;[19] and, to raise them to a more close and constant dependence for their support upon Himself, and to make them more watchful against all future occasions of sin, and for sundry other just and holy ends.[20]
From the above extract from the Westminister Confession of Faith, I see a powerful and benevolent God who can at any moment exercise his authority and no one could oppose him if he so chooses to exercise his will.
However in light of his awesome almighty power, God doesn't force his way into our lives, but rather takes an arbitrary role of conciliator, through the process of dialogue. The dialogue that is at play is the very one on one experience that one has with God, whether good or bad. God is a wonderful teacher who allows his students to self discover and become independent learners through the journey of life. He not only highlights our errors but allows us to correct them, so to become owners of our learning and in turn encourage and to teach others to do so also. So God uses the elect within a society to scaffold the rest who look up to ministerial leaders who guide others to self discovering their relationship with God and to one day become independent life long learners.
The Christian God is the definition of the word Love and is a being who wants the betterment of mankind and in so doing he doesn't merely transmit his will forcefully onto his students/subjects, rather allows them by giving them subtle queues, that encourage learning on an intrinsic personal aspired level. God teaches us through love and compassion and not by fear.
God would therefore be likened to a teacher who takes an arbitrator's role, like a teacher who sits at the back of the classroom and allows the students to collaborate with one another on life's issues and God simply highlights points that the group can self discover and to promote in a dynamic lively learning atmosphere that is pleasant and safe to learn in. On the other hand, when you consider Islam for example, we see a god being worshipped who requires all in attendance to be submissive and ready to receive a transmission style of teaching that prevents them to learn or to self discover their own relationship with their god. We see in Islam the subjects have no free will and the deity they worship doesn't reciprocate or care for the individuals learning and that learning becomes extrinsically motivated through fear of the peer group, rather than the love to worship. Christianity is the complete opposite of Islam and in this respect Christianity is the only way to know God on a personal level, whereby we call him ABBA.
Upvote
0