- Sep 9, 2021
- 30
- 5
- 54
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
I often here this debate and both sides have scriptures to support their point of view. Why can't both be right?
Why can't some Christians be taken at the beginning of the tribulation and some taken at the end of the tribulation?
Here's the scenario.
At the beginning of the tribulation, some Christians are taken. This isn't seen as the Rapture because a lot of well known Christians weren't taken. So this is called an invasion.
The antichrist and his system will say we can protect you from being taken if they come back if you do what we say or take this mark which I believe will be a name of blasphemy.
Christians will resist and die along with the two witnesses during the tribulation and the ones that are still alive that are in the 1st Resurrection will be transformed when Christ returns.
So people could be debating these things but they're both right.
Why can't some Christians be taken at the beginning of the tribulation and some taken at the end of the tribulation?
Here's the scenario.
At the beginning of the tribulation, some Christians are taken. This isn't seen as the Rapture because a lot of well known Christians weren't taken. So this is called an invasion.
The antichrist and his system will say we can protect you from being taken if they come back if you do what we say or take this mark which I believe will be a name of blasphemy.
Christians will resist and die along with the two witnesses during the tribulation and the ones that are still alive that are in the 1st Resurrection will be transformed when Christ returns.
So people could be debating these things but they're both right.