• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Potential Christian with great doubts

EgbertTheFourth

New Member
Dec 25, 2007
1
0
36
✟22,643.00
Faith
Agnostic
Thanks for all the replies everyone. And sorry for the mix-up. I'll try to seperate the replies for each person.

I think we have a problem here. You are trying to communicate with us all using one post and i think you are getting our answers mixed up.
You're right. I'm sorry for that. I will try to seperately reply to each person.

-------

Yes. That is love.
And if you give your life to Jesus, that is love.
Is all love the same, or should the love you have for Christ be bigger than the love you have for your relatives?

-------

quite simply, yes.

but the more you get to know Him, the more things start to make some sense (although we will never have perfect knowledge until we are with Him).
In what way will things make sense?

-------

First you said that you didn't want to choose Christianity out of fear, but rather out of love. I made the point that it's not necessary to hold yourself to that standard since Jesus taught us to be afraid of hell, and the Bible also teaches that God loved us first.
So fear is not necessarily evil, just like love isn't necessarily good? As Jesus said that even sinners love those who love them.

I became convicted of my sinfulness before God.
I asked God to help me humble myself before Him so I would confess my sins.
God helped me humble myself.
I confessed my sins.
God forgave me.
I received a new spirit which was alive to God and dead to sin.
I received power to say no to sin.
I began to live my life for God with all my heart.
But when did you realize that Jesus was the only way to Salvation? When did you think: "This is the truth"?

May God open the eyes of your understanding.
Happy New Year.
Happy New Year to you too.

-------

Yes it has been stated that the only way to eternity with God is through Jesus and Jesus has no problem granting eternity to innocents who have died. Because they are innocent.
Where in the Bible does he say that?

How does the age of death have any relevance on the Love of God towards anyone?
Because I don't see how creating a baby and then destroying it right afterwards serves any divine purpose. Unless you're talking about the effect it can have on the family, but then again, I don't see how God wants the family to be upset about it.

It could be argued that God loves the babies that die more than the people He allows to go on to old age because the babies get to paradise without facing the troubles and tribulations this life throws at them.
But if God infinitely loves his children, then how can he love one more than one other? However, I do see your point. But life also throws good things, and I think God created life for a purpose.

The death of a person irrespective of their age should not be seen as an indication of Gods love or otherwise of that person or the people who are close to that person.
Why not?

-------

Thanks everyone. Happy New Year.
 
Upvote 0

Mary_Magdalene

AKA..Godschosengirl
Feb 3, 2004
12,255
408
✟37,828.00
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Married
-------


In what way will things make sense?

hmm....you know how when you dont know someone, it is easy to question why they do things or make certain decisions. when you know someone well, you gain an understanding of them. you can look at their life and see why they chose one path or made this decision, etc.

when you come to know God and study about Him thru His word, you come to have a better understanding of Him and the decisions He makes. Again, we will never completely understand Him but it is easier when you know Him.

since i have been a believer, i can read something in the bible and just completely accept it because it is God's decision. I have grown to trust Him. there are still many moments where I want to be in control of my own life (being a type A control freak ;) ). But i am so much more able to accept His decisions and choices when I know that His ways are faaarrr much better than mine.
His ways-no matter how much the world may view them as "odd"- are the best ways.
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
As in liking? If so, then it's because I find it interesting and educating. I'm not sure whether all these things that have been told, have actually happened. I can see a lot of motives for someone to make something up like this.
Yes and no. If you look at the picture we have of the early church it isn't a picture of it's leaders creating powerful, comfortable, lives for themselves. If that had been their motive then early Christianity wouldn't be the religion they would invent.
Secondly it is a religion that is grounded thoroughly in it's Jewish roots but takes that in directions that seem implausible to invent. Specifically the resurrection was something that was supposed to happen to all people at the end of time - the idea that it would happen to one person in the middle of time is a completely implausible thing to invent unless that is what actually happened.

Now that doesn't mean that John's description is supposed to be a bare, factually precise account of things - John (and the other gospel authors) are theologians at least as much as historians. The tell the story in such a way as to make the theological connections that need to be made.

I don't know whether it has been made up or not, that's why I'm in doubt. The Bible also has got a lot of contradicting verses, which I find confusing.
There are contradictions and contradictions. If you look at the lists of contradictions published around the place many of them are rather silly - they take the language of a passage too literally or more precisely than context warrants for instance.

Some of the contradictions are genuine though - particularly when there are parallel discriptions (Samuel/Kings vs Chronicles, the 4 Gospels when you compare them). But that is to be expected; if you get 4 people to tell their independent accounts of a major, real event you will get 4 accounts that do not quite agree. It's actually a sign of their authenticity - if they were made up the discrepancies would have been dealt with and removed by the early church. They weren't because the accounts themselves were too valuable to tamper with.

If you take, say, the story of Easter Morning, John (in possibly the most moving account in the entire bible) has theological connections he wants to make clear. So he has only Mary of Magdala there first thing in the morning. He has Jesus call her by the proper Hebrew version of her name (Miriam) rather than the Greek version (Maria) that he has largely used so far. And then he sends her off to announce what has happened to everybody else. John wants, among other things, to make it quite clear that this is the New Miriam announcing the New Exodus, as the original Miriam announced the original Exodus as the Red Sea closed again behind Israel. The other gospel authors want to make different connections clear so they write the same story in different ways.
 
Upvote 0

Digit

Senior Veteran
Mar 4, 2007
3,364
215
Australia
✟20,070.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hey EgbertTheFourth,

I think this thread will come off confusing you more than helping, because each of us have slightly different focuses and ideas about our faith. Some will say sex before marriage is ok, some will believe in creationism and so on. This I think, is something that overall, Christians do very badly, is explain in simple terms their faith and it's reasons.

You for example will have issues with some things in the Bible, and from each of us you may well get a different explanation. Each of us, however, have a complete picture of our faith and are trying to show you mere pieces of it, again - from each of us - that do not necessarily match up. Think of a jigsaw puzzle, each one of us is a complete puzzle that shows a complete picture. Yet here we are mixing and matching pieces.

This is why it is so important to discover these things for yourself, as you will eventually form a complete picture too.

I can see a lot of motives for someone to make something up like this. I don't know whether it has been made up or not, that's why I'm in doubt. The Bible also has got a lot of contradicting verses, which I find confusing.
The thing is, you need to ask if it's not only probable, but possible, for a work of fiction to move A) So many people to reform their lives and B) To withstand so much time. In addition, you need to really find out if these purported contradictions are in fact valid. Many, if not all, come from translational errors that scribes have made when translating from Hebrew and Greek to English.

So it's all a matter of faith rather than reason?
I don't think it's ever a matter of solely one or another. As I said, there will be questions that are out of reach for you now, as they are for all of us, and then there are those we can logically deduce.

Can't it just be because you know better yourself, even without the Bible?
Why? Why do I know better? Let me ask you this, if you suffer from an ailment and pick up a book that describes it quite accurately, would you believe it - or would you think it's a fabricated trick?

If it were true, I think I would accept his offer. But is it the truth? I'll try finding out.
Well this is what I said earlier, what is your number 1 reason to have any doubt at all, about it's truth?

What about a baby that dies at the age of 1. He or she didn't have the chance to acknowledge God in the first place. Will he or she end up in Hell for this?
We are not told in the Bible, so we do not know for certain, but an ever-loving God would most likely (logically) not reject such a soul. It's questions like that which will leave you floundering as maybe each of us will supply a different response, yet none of which are Biblical.

Because earlier it was said that the only way to get to Heaven was to accept Christ's offer. However, not going to Heaven implies going to Hell. So... The baby will go to Hell?
Like I said, we are not told what will happen. If we put these things in context (which is another very important thing to do all the time) every reference to salvation in the Bible and our choice of whether we accept it or not, is in relation to adults, not children. It may well be that God has a different plan for them altogether. Children are in no position to make such a choice as that, and it is this that God cares about, we are told.

Also, why do babies die so young anyway? Doesn't God love them?
If we are talking of God as we are shown in the Bible, then it is said that He loves all, equally. So I do not think that is the case, I do think however, that God will leave us to live our lives as we wish. We originally sinned, and we are still paying the price for that sin, if God ran about clearing up all our messes, he would be nothing more than a babysitter for us, what would we as humans ever really learn? Have you ever seen a child that has an over-protective parent? When they are finally given free reign of something, they often mess it up, act surprised that something bad happened and later repeat their mistake again. As much as we dislike such experiences, they do make us who we are, and it's through adversity that our real strengths as God has awarded us, shine through.

It depends. If I were infinitely powerful, then I would just laugh at his attempts, because isn't it impossible to undermine the power of someone who is ultimately powerful?
Not when you give them free-will. God is omnipotent, yet he is not controlling. I certainly wouldn't just laugh at someone who slanders my name, there would be a price to pay for it. If you give someone everything, and they not only reject it, but set about destroying and spreading a message that is contrary to your wishes, I am sure there would be a price for them too.

Hmm. If it's about faith, then why do we have reason? Did Satan give us reason to blind us for the love of God?
Satan has given us nothing other than disease and death in the world. All else comes from God. Logic too, did you see the passage I quoted, "Test everything. Hold on to the good." that means you reason, logical deduction and very real cerebral processes to reach a conclusion, which is what I'm asking you to do here, in this thread. :)

To be honest, I sort of know what you mean, I think. But I didn't have this when I was reading from the Bible. One morning I woke up and suddenly "realized" that creationism might be right after all. I saw people more like God's creation than just people, and not just people, but the whole world and everything that exists. It gave me a really strange feeling, but the "realization" faded away shortly after that.
I still think Creationism has the right of things, or at least a different approach, but then I don't think I would never stake my faith on it, as like I said earlier, scientific theories which are classified as 'good' ones, generally last only about 10 years or so, so to base my prospective salvation on a man-made theory (which could be fallable as we are) only to have it change radically, which would then subsequently radically affect my faith is not a wise call, in my humble opinion. But I guess this could happen with anything, something you read, see, experience will suddenly shine a very bright and real light on things, and you might well get the impression things are deeper than you thought. I still look around at the world, and how perfectly it's designed and can't shake the feeling it has a very real intent behind it.

I don't have much good to hold on to. Also, I'm not sure whether Christianity really suits me when I think about it. I generally dislike people, especially when I think of what they've done to me in the past. Mostly I've been treated better by animals than people. And for that reason, I find it hard to accept the Christian idea that people are worth more than animals.
*laughs* You sound like me, I generally dislike people too, I'm not much of a Christian for singing, dancing, clapping etc etc. If God has a problem with that, then I will happily face what He has to say, but I've tried to change it, and it's just not part of me. For a while I was roped into that almost, charismatic, aspect of Christianity, and I really disliked it for a while. To be honest with you, Christianity demands you unlearn almost everything in your life, and to do that all at once is nigh impossible. So take it slowly. Babies don't come out performing gymnastics, they learn to crawl first, then walk and so on.

The part that hurts me most is that I've been lied to and deceived by a Christian, one who I perceive as a die-hard Christian. She was supposed to be a friend, but I don't think friends push you away when you need them most. I know even Christians aren't perfect, but still, to give me all the blame and deny everything I say... She lived so much in her own "Christian" shell of self-righteousness that I couldn't let her know what she had been doing, because she just didn't want to see it.
Well, this is what I was saying earlier too, it's hard not to make a choice on Christianity when Christians make such a poor show of demonstrating it. It's like choosing a film to watch, and being asked to see one that contains handfuls of things you abhor. So I can't really help with that, but just because people do and say things in God's name, does not mean that they actually are doing His will.

God gave us the Bible, remember what it said? "Test everything. Hold on to the good." was what your friend did good? If not, discard it. There is no point in having the Bible if we don't listen to it's words. :)

That's something that adds up to my doubts about Christianity. If she was under influence of the Holy Spirit when doing those things, then what good would the Holy Spirit to me? I know you'll probably say that doesn't have got to do anything with the relation between me and God, but it does add up to my doubts, and I hope that can be understood.
I understand, and I think that's to be expected.

Well, like I said, my biggest problem is faith vs reason and not knowing whether the Bible actually represents the truth, and if it does, why it is sometimes contradictary with today's science (like evolution vs creationism).
That's not really a lowest common denominator, that's pretty much THE big question you are asking. You need to simplify it, if you have issues with Creationism vs Evolution, then you should know that Evolution doesn't contradict the Bible. Many Christians believe that Genesis was an allegorical story, meant to convey a message, not dictate historically accurate information. This is not something to base your faith on though, but it does help to get it out the way. What else is there?

I can't say it's just this, because I would like to know whether Jesus was really divine too. You'll probably tell me about his miracles, but then we stumble on the question: did they really happen and how should I know? Faith?
Of course, but this is what I call domino'ing. People have an issue, and before it's addressed they have moved on to the next, and then the next and so on. You really, really need to sort out one issue, at least, finally. So it's put to rest, you know it was like A or B or whatever, and then you can address the next. Else you go round and round in circles.

I'll make you the same offer I've made others here, if you want help with this, I will PM you my MSN and we can start at whatever point you like, and go through from there - I'll happily research things and send you articles and such. ;)

Cheers!
Digit
 
Upvote 0

Adstar

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2005
2,184
1,381
New South Wales
✟49,258.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Quote:
Yes it has been stated that the only way to eternity with God is through Jesus and Jesus has no problem granting eternity to innocents who have died. Because they are innocent.
Where in the Bible does he say that?


The end of innocence came for Adam and eve when they ate from the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil. Si once they came to the knowledge of Good and evil they became as it where contaminated.

God reveals in scripture that the little ones have not come to the knowledge of Good and evil. Therefore they are still in the acceptable state of being like Adam and Eve where before they came to the knolwedge of Good and Evil.
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]

Deuteronomy 1:39
[FONT=&quot]"Moreover your little ones and your children, who you say will be victims, who today have no knowledge of good and evil, they shall go in there; to them I will give it, and they shall possess it.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]

This was when the Jew rebelled against Gods command to go into the Promised Land and where made to wander the desert for 40 years. God declared their little ones to be without the knowledge of Good and evil. therefore they do not need to be forgiven for sin because one needs to have the knowledge of good and evil to be able to sin.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]

[/FONT]
Quote:
How does the age of death have any relevance on the Love of God towards anyone?
Because I don't see how creating a baby and then destroying it right afterwards serves any divine purpose. Unless you're talking about the effect it can have on the family, but then again, I don't see how God wants the family to be upset about it.

[FONT=&quot]Just because we have trouble imagining a motive that would cause God to create a baby and then quickly take it to Him does not mean He does not have a reason. Maybe in some cases it is the effect on the family that God is seeking. You know sometimes the death of a baby can cause someone to seek God. In the end anything that leads one to God is a blessing even if it looks like a tragedy on the surface.



[/FONT]
Quote:
It could be argued that God loves the babies that die more than the people He allows to go on to old age because the babies get to paradise without facing the troubles and tribulations this life throws at them.
But if God infinitely loves his children, then how can he love one more than one other? However, I do see your point. But life also throws good things, and I think God created life for a purpose.

[FONT=&quot]I am not putting forward that he loves one person more than another. I am saying that it could be argued that dieing, as a baby is a blessing from God. My main point was that the age of ones death is irrelevant to Gods love for one[/FONT]



Quote:
The death of a person irrespective of their age should not be seen as an indication of Gods love or otherwise of that person or the people who are close to that person.
[FONT=&quot]Why not?

Why should it?

We are all destined to die, what does it matter when we go? People are dieing at all ages some as babies some as children some as young adults some as middle aged some as seniors. Why should people see any person’s death as being some kind of particular punishment from God. What’s the point of asking why God why God why
[/FONT] :scratch: when everyone dies.


All Praise The ancient Of Days
 
Upvote 0

salida

Veteran
Jun 14, 2006
4,305
278
✟6,243.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Luke 16:17 - The term law refers to the Word of God - the Bible. Thus, its easier for God to destroy the physical heaven and earth than to alter His Word as His Word is living and eternal. Refer to 1 Peter 1:25 as one refers to this after reading Luke 16:17. The Bible interprets itself when one studys it in depth.

I chose christianity first for spiritual reasons and second for intellectual reasons. For example, when one studys the Bible and other religious books they will find that its the only book in the world that could be written by a God. It has detailed hundreds of prophesies that has been fulfilled and more will be fulfilled. Just 5 prophesies that have already come to pass concerning Jesus birth have a 1/30 billion chance of coming true. No man could have written a book that does this but God used non perfect man to do this through the Holy Spirit.

Also, no one is good enough to enter heaven without Jesus. The standard is way way too high. If you think your good enough I strongly suggest you go to this website and ask yourself these questions.

Are you a good person? http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
 
Upvote 0

salida

Veteran
Jun 14, 2006
4,305
278
✟6,243.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
You might want to read Evidence That Demands A Verdict by Josh McDowell (as this would stand up in court) and Examine the Evidence by Muncaster (a former athiest), and The Real Jesus by Lee Strobel (former athiest). This isn't the book section but it presents the facts.

Biblical Evidence – This is a very small amount of information
out of large amounts of information out there.

Internal Evidences-Prophesies that are confirmed with Bible;

mentioning only a few – but there are hundreds.

Life of Christ
The Tribe of Judah, Gen. 49:10, Luke 3:23-28
(Genesis was written 4004 BC to 1689 BC)
(Luke’s time period is 60-70 AD)

Royal Line of David, Jer 23:5, Matt 1:1
(Jeremiah 760 to 698 BC)/(Matthew 60-70 AD)

Born of a Virgin, Isaiah 7:14/Matt 1:18-23
(Isaiah 760 to 698 BC)/(60-70 AD)

Rise of Empires
In the book of Daniel, Chapter 2 – four kingdoms are described in the interpretation
of the dream of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon: Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greek – Daniel 8:21, 10:20/ and a fourth great kingdom to follow which was part iron and clay – which is the
Roman Empire – during this empire, Christ came and the church was established – Daniel 2:44.

Historical Accuracy

The Bible is loaded with historical statements concerning events of hundreds of years ago, yet
none of them has been proven to be incorrect.
(Bible compared to other ancient documents)
New Testament – starts at 25 years – between the original and surviving copies
Homer- starts at 500 years/Demosthenes – at 1400 years/Plato – at 1200 years/
Caesar – at 1000 years

Number of Manuscript Copies

New Testament – 5,686/Homer – 643/Demosthenes – 200/Plato – 7/Caesar – 10

Consistency – Written by 40 men over a period of time exceeding 1400 years, and has no
Internal inconsistencies.



Claim of Inspiration- It claims to be spoken by God, 2 Tim 3:16-17). No other religious book makes such claims.


External Evidences

(Prophesies Outside the Bible)
These cities were prophesied to be destroyed and never to be built again- and they haven’t.
Niveveh – Nahum 1:10, 3:7, 15, Zephaniah 2:13-14
Babylon – Isaiah 13:1-22
Tyre -Ezekiel 26:1-28

Bible before Science

He hangs the earth on nothing – Job 26:7
(Job was written at least 1000 years ago – some scholars think it could have been even 3000
years ago)
Note: Man only knew the above for 350 years.
Earth is a sphere – Isaiah 40:22/Air has weight – Job 28:25/
Gravity – Job 26:7, Job 38: 31-33/Winds blow in cyclones, Eccl 1:6

Documents that Prove Bible is True

Gilgamesh Epic, The Sumerian King List, Mari Tablets, Babylonian Chronicles

Archealogical Evidence (Still adding to this list today- it hasn’t stopped)
Excavations of Ur, Location of Zoar, Ziggurats and the foundation of Tower of Babel









 
Upvote 0

whatfor

Just me
Dec 15, 2006
24,081
14,906
63
Adelaide, Australia
✟117,417.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
[FONT=&quot] We are all destined to die, what does it matter when we go? People are dieing at all ages some as babies some as children some as young adults some as middle aged some as seniors. Why should people see any person’s death as being some kind of particular punishment from God. What’s the point of asking why God why God why [/FONT] :scratch: when everyone dies.

Thanks for posting this.
While reading it, I felt like God was telling me that we have eternal life with Him, so cutting short life on (earthly), isn't taking away any of your eternal life with Him.
 
Upvote 0

SoldierOfTheKing

Christian Spenglerian
Jan 6, 2006
9,242
3,050
Kenmore, WA
✟294,168.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
EgbertTheFourth said:
What's wrong with having sex as a recreational activity?

Nothing, as long as that doesn't become its sole purpose. I'll make an analogy with eating.

The purpose of eating is to sustain the body, to provide the body the energy and nutrients that it needs to function. That doesn't mean that there's anything wrong with enjoying good food. It's not even necessarily wrong to eat something solely for pleasure, as long as you take into account what's going into your body.
But if pleasure becomes the sole focus of eating, and you live to eat, rather than eating to live, you just eat whatever you want, whenever you want, as much as you want, taking into account how much excercise you'll need to burn it off... your health will deteriorate.
So it is with sex. The common denominator of all sexual activity the Bible condemns, as I see it, is that sex ceases to be about producing children and strenghtening the bonds between husband and wife, and it just becomes about Me.

EgbertTheFourth said:
Besides, expressing love through sex binds humans together, and thus decreasing the chance on a divorce.
But in that case it is not purely recreational.

EgbertTheFourth said:
I do understand your reasoning, but then we'll have to ask ourselves where homosexuality finds its origin. Do you know? Because most people say that they can't help it, I suppose you disagree with that?

I can't say I really know. I think there are likely many possible causes of homosexuality. It's actually an interesting topic, and it's a shame that it's become so politicized. There are three points I will raise.

1. We don't have to know what causes alcoholism to conclude that alcoholism is destructive.
2. Whether or not homosexual desire can be controlled, homosexual activity centainly can.
3. Since Christianity regards human nature as sinful, homosexuality being in a person's nature would not, from a Christian standpoint, prove that it was morally acceptable.
 
Upvote 0

Faith In God

A little FIG is all we need...
Apr 3, 2004
26,429
371
Texas
✟44,060.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Hey everyone,

I'm new. For a great part of my life I've been agnostic. Recently someone introduced me to Christianity (not that I didn't know about it before) and I considered becoming a Christian myself, but I'm having some doubts. I'm not sure whether this belongs in the struggle forum or in the questions forum, but since I'm going to ask some questions, I guess it belongs here. I hope you guys can help me with this.

I always looked up to Jesus, but when I started reading passages of the Bible, there were things that were concerning me.

Luke 16:17 - "It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid."

Matthew 15:18-19 - “For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”

But when I read the laws of Moses, I strongly disagree with the morals they are teaching people. Like, why should parents stone their own children when they're rebellious? It's still their child.
So you're saying that God is wrong for reinforcing childhood obedience and parental respect?? What's wrong with disallowing the act of cursing one's parents???
By the way, nowhere in the Bible is there a recorded incident of this law being broken. :)

And what's wrong with homosexual people?
It's a lust that God has forbidden. I'm sure you agree that lust for animals should be forbidden?
In the same way, God forbade the lust for similar sexes.

Also, why enforce your beliefs upon others by killing non-believers?
That NEVER happened. God never converted anyone by force: those whom God executed were JUDGED by His representative nation. We're talking about kingdoms built on religions where the people would sacrifice their children alive.

I know these things aren't practiced these days, but I thought God's word was eternal. Besides, Jesus said that no single letter would pass away from the Old Testament.
God's statutes are eternal, yes.
What you're getting hung up on are the enforcements of His Law.
But see...times are different. God could say "exile the alien who does not worship me" to the Israelites...because the nation willingly belonged to Him.

God still feels the same way (He's not going to say "Kill such and such" and then the next day say "Oh, he's fine"), but He will execute judgment on those who choose to disobey His ways on His own at the End of the Age.

Also, to me it sounds like the only way to get to Heaven is to accept Jesus as your Saviour. I know a Christian who has done some pretty horrible crimes. Yet, according to Jesus, he could just 'repent' for his sins and be over with it, and still go to Heaven. But then I'm here, trying to help people and not do any sort of evil (I know I will always make mistakes, but I'm trying to be a 'good' person), but if I don't accept Jesus as my Saviour, I will go to Hell? That doesn't seem to make any sense to me. If I were to become a Christian, then I'd become one just to be 'safe', but then again, that isn't who I am. Then I'd just be using Jesus, because I only chose him so I could get my free ticket to Heaven. Then I wouldn't chose Christianity out of love, but out of fear. And I really don't want that to happen, so I guess it's Hell for me.
Christ IS a free ticket. But the price paid was high.
Yes, the murderer who repented of his sin and trusts in Jesus will gain everlasting life (assuming He follows Christ afterwards), because he's now going to do ALL HE CAN to follow the Lord. And what more can God ask of us?

If you truly are concerned about hell...don't become a Christian "by default": there is no default, because if you wanted to play it safe, you'd have to also follow every other religion to be saved from their versions of hell...and a follower of Christ can't be that way: that is NOT trusting in Christ.
If you really do believe that Christ is the way to heaven...then give up the rights to your life and follow Him. It's not just a prayer that allows you access to Christ's gift: it is your life. Don't think it's as simple as saying you're sorry for doing one thing or another: it's a lifetime service and then some.

But it's worth it. :)
Hell is horrible, but Christ suffered your punishment that you justly deserve, so that you wouldn't have to suffer it yourself! Don't be afraid letting fear be a part of why you turn to Christ! Proverbs says that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of righteousness, and Paul says that it is a terrifying thing to fall into the hands of the living God!
But on the flipside, He loved you past your abhorrent sins. So it's not all fear: it's love. You know what you deserve, and yet He pays the price.

:prayer:
 
Upvote 0

Mary_Magdalene

AKA..Godschosengirl
Feb 3, 2004
12,255
408
✟37,828.00
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Married
Luke 16:17 - The term law refers to the Word of God - the Bible. Thus, its easier for God to destroy the physical heaven and earth than to alter His Word as His Word is living and eternal. Refer to 1 Peter 1:25 as one refers to this after reading Luke 16:17. The Bible interprets itself when one studys it in depth.

I chose christianity first for spiritual reasons and second for intellectual reasons. For example, when one studys the Bible and other religious books they will find that its the only book in the world that could be written by a God. It has detailed hundreds of prophesies that has been fulfilled and more will be fulfilled. Just 5 prophesies that have already come to pass concerning Jesus birth have a 1/30 billion chance of coming true. No man could have written a book that does this but God used non perfect man to do this through the Holy Spirit.

Also, no one is good enough to enter heaven without Jesus. The standard is way way too high. If you think your good enough I strongly suggest you go to this website and ask yourself these questions.

Are you a good person? http://www.livingwaters.com/good/

Thanks for posting this link! I went thru it (and of course failed!). God's grace is so sufficient to cover all of my sins! :bow:
 
Upvote 0

EgbertTheFourth

New Member
Dec 25, 2007
1
0
36
✟22,643.00
Faith
Agnostic
Thanks for all the honest replies everyone!

hmm....you know how when you dont know someone, it is easy to question why they do things or make certain decisions. when you know someone well, you gain an understanding of them. you can look at their life and see why they chose one path or made this decision, etc.

when you come to know God and study about Him thru His word, you come to have a better understanding of Him and the decisions He makes. Again, we will never completely understand Him but it is easier when you know Him.

since i have been a believer, i can read something in the bible and just completely accept it because it is God's decision. I have grown to trust Him. there are still many moments where I want to be in control of my own life (being a type A control freak ;) ). But i am so much more able to accept His decisions and choices when I know that His ways are faaarrr much better than mine.
His ways-no matter how much the world may view them as "odd"- are the best ways.
Including what happened in the Old Testament? God seemed a lot more angry back then.

-----

Now that doesn't mean that John's description is supposed to be a bare, factually precise account of things - John (and the other gospel authors) are theologians at least as much as historians. The tell the story in such a way as to make the theological connections that need to be made.
I thought that God's Word ought to be precise?

Some of the contradictions are genuine though - particularly when there are parallel discriptions (Samuel/Kings vs Chronicles, the 4 Gospels when you compare them). But that is to be expected; if you get 4 people to tell their independent accounts of a major, real event you will get 4 accounts that do not quite agree. It's actually a sign of their authenticity - if they were made up the discrepancies would have been dealt with and removed by the early church. They weren't because the accounts themselves were too valuable to tamper with.

If you take, say, the story of Easter Morning, John (in possibly the most moving account in the entire bible) has theological connections he wants to make clear. So he has only Mary of Magdala there first thing in the morning. He has Jesus call her by the proper Hebrew version of her name (Miriam) rather than the Greek version (Maria) that he has largely used so far. And then he sends her off to announce what has happened to everybody else. John wants, among other things, to make it quite clear that this is the New Miriam announcing the New Exodus, as the original Miriam announced the original Exodus as the Red Sea closed again behind Israel. The other gospel authors want to make different connections clear so they write the same story in different ways.
That does seem to solve some of my problems I had with the Bible.

It's actually a sign of their authenticity - if they were made up the discrepancies would have been dealt with and removed by the early church. They weren't because the accounts themselves were too valuable to tamper with.
Either that, or a double bluff. I can't be 100% sure.

-----

I think this thread will come off confusing you more than helping, because each of us have slightly different focuses and ideas about our faith. Some will say sex before marriage is ok, some will believe in creationism and so on. This I think, is something that overall, Christians do very badly, is explain in simple terms their faith and it's reasons.

You for example will have issues with some things in the Bible, and from each of us you may well get a different explanation. Each of us, however, have a complete picture of our faith and are trying to show you mere pieces of it, again - from each of us - that do not necessarily match up. Think of a jigsaw puzzle, each one of us is a complete puzzle that shows a complete picture. Yet here we are mixing and matching pieces.

This is why it is so important to discover these things for yourself, as you will eventually form a complete picture too.
I agree with this, but...

"Know this first of all, that there is no prophecy of scripture that is a matter of personal interpretation, for no prophecy ever came through human will; but rather human beings moved by the holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God." (2 Peter 20-21 NAB)

How is it possible for us to interpret God's Word, which is supposed not to be open for personal interpretation, in a lot of different ways? Is it bad?

The thing is, you need to ask if it's not only probable, but possible, for a work of fiction to move A) So many people to reform their lives and B) To withstand so much time. In addition, you need to really find out if these purported contradictions are in fact valid. Many, if not all, come from translational errors that scribes have made when translating from Hebrew and Greek to English.
It's not very convenient for the truth to have translation errors, is it? Like mistaking "p" for "q". While previously it had been stated that "not q". That sounds like a pretty damaging error, if you ask me.

Why? Why do I know better? Let me ask you this, if you suffer from an ailment and pick up a book that describes it quite accurately, would you believe it - or would you think it's a fabricated trick?
It could be coincidence, not necessarily a fabricated trick or the truth. But it is possible for it to be the truth regarding to my ailment.

Well this is what I said earlier, what is your number 1 reason to have any doubt at all, about it's truth?
Honestly, I don't know anymore... I'm not really good at making decisions, like setting priorities. I have several reasons that add up.

1) The book is written by people, under influence of the Holy Spirit?
2) Why would God allow mistranslations of the truth?
3) God used to not so nice in the Old Testament, but in the New Testament, he's suddenly very peaceful?
4) Why does prayer only seem to work in ambigious situations?
...

We are not told in the Bible, so we do not know for certain, but an ever-loving God would most likely (logically) not reject such a soul. It's questions like that which will leave you floundering as maybe each of us will supply a different response, yet none of which are Biblical.
In that case we assume what God would do. But do we really know him? Can we even imagine his greatness and glory?

Like I said, we are not told what will happen. If we put these things in context (which is another very important thing to do all the time) every reference to salvation in the Bible and our choice of whether we accept it or not, is in relation to adults, not children. It may well be that God has a different plan for them altogether. Children are in no position to make such a choice as that, and it is this that God cares about, we are told.
(added underlining)
I agree with your reasoning. Do you know where I could find verses that have to do with the underlined sentences?

If we are talking of God as we are shown in the Bible, then it is said that He loves all, equally. So I do not think that is the case, I do think however, that God will leave us to live our lives as we wish. We originally sinned, and we are still paying the price for that sin, if God ran about clearing up all our messes, he would be nothing more than a babysitter for us, what would we as humans ever really learn? Have you ever seen a child that has an over-protective parent? When they are finally given free reign of something, they often mess it up, act surprised that something bad happened and later repeat their mistake again. As much as we dislike such experiences, they do make us who we are, and it's through adversity that our real strengths as God has awarded us, shine through.
Didn't Jesus sacrifice himself for the original sin? And didn't the Bible say that children don't pay for their parents' sins?

Not when you give them free-will. God is omnipotent, yet he is not controlling. I certainly wouldn't just laugh at someone who slanders my name, there would be a price to pay for it. If you give someone everything, and they not only reject it, but set about destroying and spreading a message that is contrary to your wishes, I am sure there would be a price for them too.
I don't think you can blame people for not knowing about your existence if you're hiding yourself. It's like giving an anonymous Valentine card to someone you love. However, the person you love thinks it comes from someone else. Can you really blame that person?

Though, I do agree that it's wrong to say that God doesn't exist, because you can't possibly know if that is true. And it's even worse to enforce your flawed beliefs upon others.

Satan has given us nothing other than disease and death in the world. All else comes from God. Logic too, did you see the passage I quoted, "Test everything. Hold on to the good." that means you reason, logical deduction and very real cerebral processes to reach a conclusion, which is what I'm asking you to do here, in this thread. :)
Yes, I saw the passage you quoted. But I'm not able to reason that God and Jesus do exist, neither am I able to reason that God and Jesus don't exist. So does he really mind if I don't accept Jesus as my Saviour, because I really care about my soul and will only give it away once I know. Even then it's hard to say whether I would accept Jesus' offer, because the only way to go to heaven is to accept Jesus' offer. Yet, my morals tell me that it's your actions that matters, and not your beliefs. This is what makes it so hard.

I'm sorry if I'm being vague and mixing too much up. I'm a very chaotic person.

You sound like me, I generally dislike people too, I'm not much of a Christian for singing, dancing, clapping etc etc. If God has a problem with that, then I will happily face what He has to say, but I've tried to change it, and it's just not part of me. For a while I was roped into that almost, charismatic, aspect of Christianity, and I really disliked it for a while. To be honest with you, Christianity demands you unlearn almost everything in your life, and to do that all at once is nigh impossible. So take it slowly. Babies don't come out performing gymnastics, they learn to crawl first, then walk and so on.
It's good to hear I'm not the only one.

That's not really a lowest common denominator, that's pretty much THE big question you are asking. You need to simplify it, if you have issues with Creationism vs Evolution, then you should know that Evolution doesn't contradict the Bible. Many Christians believe that Genesis was an allegorical story, meant to convey a message, not dictate historically accurate information. This is not something to base your faith on though, but it does help to get it out the way. What else is there?
I really have a lot of trouble finding the lowest common denominator.

Of course, but this is what I call domino'ing. People have an issue, and before it's addressed they have moved on to the next, and then the next and so on. You really, really need to sort out one issue, at least, finally. So it's put to rest, you know it was like A or B or whatever, and then you can address the next. Else you go round and round in circles.
Yeah, that's what I'm kind of doing right now.

I'll make you the same offer I've made others here, if you want help with this, I will PM you my MSN and we can start at whatever point you like, and go through from there - I'll happily research things and send you articles and such. ;)
Thanks for the offer. I'll think about it. :) I really appreciate it.

-----

Sounds like you aren't someone who is going to jump into something .

I was like you in fact it took me 5 months of going to church before I finally realized it was right.

I can't explain what convinced me
At that point, you just thought to know?
 
Upvote 0

EgbertTheFourth

New Member
Dec 25, 2007
1
0
36
✟22,643.00
Faith
Agnostic
The end of innocence came for Adam and eve when they ate from the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil. Si once they came to the knowledge of Good and evil they became as it where contaminated.

God reveals in scripture that the little ones have not come to the knowledge of Good and evil. Therefore they are still in the acceptable state of being like Adam and Eve where before they came to the knolwedge of Good and Evil.

Deuteronomy 1:39
[FONT=&quot]"Moreover your little ones and your children, who you say will be victims, who today have no knowledge of good and evil, they shall go in there; to them I will give it, and they shall possess it.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]

This was when the Jew rebelled against Gods command to go into the Promised Land and where made to wander the desert for 40 years. God declared their little ones to be without the knowledge of Good and evil. therefore they do not need to be forgiven for sin because one needs to have the knowledge of good and evil to be able to sin.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
That makes sense. Thanks a lot.

Just because we have trouble imagining a motive that would cause God to create a baby and then quickly take it to Him does not mean He does not have a reason. Maybe in some cases it is the effect on the family that God is seeking. You know sometimes the death of a baby can cause someone to seek God. In the end anything that leads one to God is a blessing even if it looks like a tragedy on the surface.
I see your point!

Why should it?

We are all destined to die, what does it matter when we go? People are dieing at all ages some as babies some as children some as young adults some as middle aged some as seniors. Why should people see any person’s death as being some kind of particular punishment from God. What’s the point of asking why God why God why
:scratch: when everyone dies.
I'm sure there are people (adults) who died at a certain age, before being saved by Jesus. That would imply that they would go to Hell.

What I'm wondering is, does God control your time of death? I think you implied this by saying that God could have created a baby to let it die, so that the family would convert.

-----

I chose christianity first for spiritual reasons and second for intellectual reasons. For example, when one studys the Bible and other religious books they will find that its the only book in the world that could be written by a God. It has detailed hundreds of prophesies that has been fulfilled and more will be fulfilled. Just 5 prophesies that have already come to pass concerning Jesus birth have a 1/30 billion chance of coming true. No man could have written a book that does this but God used non perfect man to do this through the Holy Spirit.
There are people who say that Jesus didn't fulfill the Messias prophecy at all. And even if he did, it's still possible that it's coincidence, even though it's more logical to assume that it wasn't coincidence.

Also, no one is good enough to enter heaven without Jesus. The standard is way way too high.
Why are the standards so high for "man who was made after God's image"?

If you think your good enough I strongly suggest you go to this website and ask yourself these questions.
According to the site, I'm a pretty bad person and need Jesus to save me. Even though I don't lie much for example, I have done it at times.
 
Upvote 0

EgbertTheFourth

New Member
Dec 25, 2007
1
0
36
✟22,643.00
Faith
Agnostic
You might want to read Evidence That Demands A Verdict by Josh McDowell (as this would stand up in court) and Examine the Evidence by Muncaster (a former athiest), and The Real Jesus by Lee Strobel (former athiest). This isn't the book section but it presents the facts.
Interesting.

The Bible is loaded with historical statements concerning events of hundreds of years ago, yet
none of them has been proven to be incorrect.
Actually, usually you prove something to be correct. Just because it hasn't been proven to be incorrect, doesn't mean that it's correct.

-----

The purpose of eating is to sustain the body, to provide the body the energy and nutrients that it needs to function. That doesn't mean that there's anything wrong with enjoying good food. It's not even necessarily wrong to eat something solely for pleasure, as long as you take into account what's going into your body.
But if pleasure becomes the sole focus of eating, and you live to eat, rather than eating to live, you just eat whatever you want, whenever you want, as much as you want, taking into account how much excercise you'll need to burn it off... your health will deteriorate.
So it is with sex. The common denominator of all sexual activity the Bible condemns, as I see it, is that sex ceases to be about producing children and strenghtening the bonds between husband and wife, and it just becomes about Me.
I totally agree.

But in that case it is not purely recreational.
True.

1. We don't have to know what causes alcoholism to conclude that alcoholism is destructive.
2. Whether or not homosexual desire can be controlled, homosexual activity centainly can.
3. Since Christianity regards human nature as sinful, homosexuality being in a person's nature would not, from a Christian standpoint, prove that it was morally acceptable.
I agree.

-----

While waling this Earth, you can never know, only believe.
But there are so many things that people believe. A tells you that if you don't believe in A, it's bad. B tells the same story, but for B. Same for C, D, E, F, etc. I can't just randomly pick one of those many options. There's so much to believe, that it's almost immoral to believe that you're right, without knowing everything to compare it against. I can believe A, because I'm scared that "it'll be bad if I don't pick A". But perhaps B was right, and I was wrong for picking A.

So you're saying that God is wrong for reinforcing childhood obedience and parental respect?? What's wrong with disallowing the act of cursing one's parents???
By the way, nowhere in the Bible is there a recorded incident of this law being broken.
:)
No, I'm not. There's nothing wrong with disallowing the act of cursing one's parents. But if a child fails to obey, then it's the parents' fault. After all, the parents are responsible for the child they're raising, and for what they will learn and experience. We are the sum of our experiences. I think it's bad for a parent to let their children be stoned to death; you may be solving the problem, but not the cause. New problems may arise from the same cause.

It's a lust that God has forbidden. I'm sure you agree that lust for animals should be forbidden?
In the same way, God forbade the lust for similar sexes.
Where does this lust come from anyway?

lust <-- sin <-- Satan <-- God

That NEVER happened. God never converted anyone by force: those whom God executed were JUDGED by His representative nation. We're talking about kingdoms built on religions where the people would sacrifice their children alive.
Deuteronomy 13:13-16
'If you hear that in one of the towns, there are men who are telling people to go and worship other gods, it is your duty to look into the matter and examine it. If it is proved and confirmed, you must put the inhabitants of that town to the sword.'

In context, they aren't talking about specific people. Just about people who believe something different than they did.

Yes, the murderer who repented of his sin and trusts in Jesus will gain everlasting life (assuming He follows Christ afterwards), because he's now going to do ALL HE CAN to follow the Lord. And what more can God ask of us?
Justice.

If you truly are concerned about hell...don't become a Christian "by default": there is no default, because if you wanted to play it safe, you'd have to also follow every other religion to be saved from their versions of hell...and a follower of Christ can't be that way: that is NOT trusting in Christ.
If you really do believe that Christ is the way to heaven...then give up the rights to your life and follow Him. It's not just a prayer that allows you access to Christ's gift: it is your life. Don't think it's as simple as saying you're sorry for doing one thing or another: it's a lifetime service and then some.
You are right. And that's exactly my concern. What if the Islam is right, and Christianity isn't? What if Buddhism was right after all? What if the Egyptian Gods were the real Gods? etc.

But it's worth it. :)
Hell is horrible, but Christ suffered your punishment that you justly deserve, so that you wouldn't have to suffer it yourself! Don't be afraid letting fear be a part of why you turn to Christ! Proverbs says that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of righteousness, and Paul says that it is a terrifying thing to fall into the hands of the living God!
But on the flipside, He loved you past your abhorrent sins. So it's not all fear: it's love. You know what you deserve, and yet He pays the price.
Do I deserve eternal torment in hell for making mistakes that any human could make? Nice God.

Thanks everyone.

- EgbertTheFourth
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
I thought that God's Word ought to be precise?
You cannot be precise about everything all of the time (or the text becomes infinitely long and completely unreadable). The purpose of the gospels isn't to be historically precise but theologically precise while staying broadly true to the actual events. The theology we learn about Jesus is important. That we can construct (say) the exact timeline of his life isn't.


That does seem to solve some of my problems I had with the Bible.
:)


Either that, or a double bluff. I can't be 100% sure.
Oh, I'm not claiming that it proves them to be authentic, just that discrepancies are an indication in favour of authenticity, not against.
-----


I agree with this, but...

"Know this first of all, that there is no prophecy of scripture that is a matter of personal interpretation, for no prophecy ever came through human will; but rather human beings moved by the holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God." (2 Peter 20-21 NAB)

How is it possible for us to interpret God's Word, which is supposed not to be open for personal interpretation, in a lot of different ways? Is it bad?
I think you, like so many people, are misinterpreting 2nd Peter. That verse has been abused so much by people twisting it to mean "your interpretation is wrong (and mine is right" that people have stopped reading what is a difficult to understand letter for what it really is. What the author is trying to say is much more subtle than "don't try and understand scripture".

It's not very convenient for the truth to have translation errors, is it? Like mistaking "p" for "q". While previously it had been stated that "not q". That sounds like a pretty damaging error, if you ask me.
Translation errors as such aren't very common in the mainstream translations any more, but often translation isn't a straightforward job. There very often isn't a word in English that carries the same set of connotations as the Greek or Hebrew word or phrase. So translators have no option but to make difficult choices in how to translate.


It could be coincidence, not necessarily a fabricated trick or the truth. But it is possible for it to be the truth regarding to my ailment.


Honestly, I don't know anymore... I'm not really good at making decisions, like setting priorities. I have several reasons that add up.

1) The book is written by people, under influence of the Holy Spirit?
Yep.
2) Why would God allow mistranslations of the truth?
God works primarily through fallible human beings with all our limitations, including the limitations of our languages and our skills.

3) God used to not so nice in the Old Testament, but in the New Testament, he's suddenly very peaceful?
I think you misunderstand the OT. The people who wrote the OT didn't think of God as an ogre, but as Israel's exhasperated but loving husband. Nevertheless it is in Jesus of Nazareth we see God most clearly.


4) Why does prayer only seem to work in ambigious situations?
The purpose of prayer isn't to prove God but to participate in God's love working in the world.
 
Upvote 0

zaksmummy

Senior Member
Jul 6, 2007
2,198
196
Chesterfield
✟18,366.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Hi Egburt,

Jesus says that he came not to nullify the law, but to fulfill it.

This means that he came so that instead of having to adhere to the whole law (a rule) he would give us a heart to adhere to it (a desire)

Can you see the difference? The bible says that he will write the law on our hearts, ie we will WANT to obey Gods commandments.
 
Upvote 0

EgbertTheFourth

New Member
Dec 25, 2007
1
0
36
✟22,643.00
Faith
Agnostic
Oh, I'm not claiming that it proves them to be authentic, just that discrepancies are an indication in favour of authenticity, not against.
Yeah.

I think you, like so many people, are misinterpreting 2nd Peter. That verse has been abused so much by people twisting it to mean "your interpretation is wrong (and mine is right" that people have stopped reading what is a difficult to understand letter for what it really is. What the author is trying to say is much more subtle than "don't try and understand scripture".
Either that, or you're personally interpreting that part aswell. If the author meant something like "don't try and understand scripture", then what's the purpose of reading the Bible, if you can't understand it?

Translation errors as such aren't very common in the mainstream translations any more, but often translation isn't a straightforward job. There very often isn't a word in English that carries the same set of connotations as the Greek or Hebrew word or phrase. So translators have no option but to make difficult choices in how to translate.
Yes, I know what you mean, but it can make things complicated when we're trying to comprehend passages.

I think you misunderstand the OT. The people who wrote the OT didn't think of God as an ogre, but as Israel's exhasperated but loving husband. Nevertheless it is in Jesus of Nazareth we see God most clearly.
That doesn't seem to make any sense to me. If God wants all of us to be perfect, then there should be only one way to do it, no? If you read some passages of the Old Testament, there are some (in my opinion) pretty horrible things going on. How is that justified?

The purpose of prayer isn't to prove God but to participate in God's love working in the world.
Because God wants to remain hidden? Why does he want to do that anyway? Does he respect the so-called free will that atheists have, so that Christians will never be able to prove the existence of God? Because he knows that true Christians have faith and "know" that God helped them?
 
Upvote 0

EgbertTheFourth

New Member
Dec 25, 2007
1
0
36
✟22,643.00
Faith
Agnostic
Jesus says that he came not to nullify the law, but to fulfill it.

This means that he came so that instead of having to adhere to the whole law (a rule) he would give us a heart to adhere to it (a desire)

Can you see the difference? The bible says that he will write the law on our hearts, ie we will WANT to obey Gods commandments.
I understand what you mean, but what about all those stories from the Old Testament that were rather vile?
 
Upvote 0