Polygamy is difficult enough with persecution from friends and family without the threat of government intervention. Most polygynists would be satisfied with 'decriminalization' with no change in benefits.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
too many husbands would drive any woman crazy, I want one husband thank you very much.,

I know a woman who lives with her two boyfriends... but th two guys are both straight so they are just friends who live together. It works well for them.Well, I was rather talking about the Islamic variant of polygamy, where the man is married to several women separately - they aren't all married to each other in one big marital union, or anything like that. Which means that, at the end of the day, the wives will have to share a husband, which is bound to cause all sorts of problems. Which is why it shouldn't be engaged in lightly.
I believe it has to do with the secular contract between the married couple.Isn't it rather odd that while it is perfectly legal to live and sleep with with two or more women (or two men if you are a woman), it only becomes illegal if you marry them both.
Somebody might explain the logic of this, because it eludes me.
And BTW, I agree with DLaurier - one woman is more than enough, especially when the "will there be kids with that?" order comes into play.
Norm
Exactly!Depends on what you mean. If you mean people should be able to enter a religious arrangement of marriage with multiple people, then it should be up to the religion. If you mean civil marriage multiple times, no. For one, we'd have to completely rewrite tax law and a myriad of other things to try to fit this "union" into society. Companies would be required to pay retirement benefits to as many spouses as you have. It just doesn't fit our model of society. But if they wish to separately have their religious marriage to 5 people, I'm not going to throw them in jail for it.
Was there really ever an assumption that people would be married against their will?
I can only understand polygamy through what I know of monogamy, and I have never heard of people in the United States essentially told 'you're marrying me and you can do nothing about it.'