• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

polygamy

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,495
4,025
48
✟1,239,114.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
Well, I was rather talking about the Islamic variant of polygamy, where the man is married to several women separately - they aren't all married to each other in one big marital union, or anything like that. Which means that, at the end of the day, the wives will have to share a husband, which is bound to cause all sorts of problems. Which is why it shouldn't be engaged in lightly.
I know a woman who lives with her two boyfriends... but th two guys are both straight so they are just friends who live together. It works well for them.

Personally if I was a married Islamic man and I found another woman I was interested in as well, I'd defiantly want my wife to be able to care about and live with the other girl before I made any long term decisions.
 
Upvote 0

Maynard Keenan

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2004
8,470
789
39
Louisville, KY
✟35,085.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Depends on what you mean. If you mean people should be able to enter a religious arrangement of marriage with multiple people, then it should be up to the religion. If you mean civil marriage multiple times, no. For one, we'd have to completely rewrite tax law and a myriad of other things to try to fit this "union" into society. Companies would be required to pay retirement benefits to as many spouses as you have. It just doesn't fit our model of society. But if they wish to separately have their religious marriage to 5 people, I'm not going to throw them in jail for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirPo
Upvote 0

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,363
7,214
62
✟184,357.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Isn't it rather odd that while it is perfectly legal to live and sleep with with two or more women (or two men if you are a woman), it only becomes illegal if you marry them both.

Somebody might explain the logic of this, because it eludes me.

And BTW, I agree with DLaurier - one woman is more than enough, especially when the "will there be kids with that?" order comes into play.

Norm
I believe it has to do with the secular contract between the married couple.
 
Upvote 0

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,363
7,214
62
✟184,357.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Depends on what you mean. If you mean people should be able to enter a religious arrangement of marriage with multiple people, then it should be up to the religion. If you mean civil marriage multiple times, no. For one, we'd have to completely rewrite tax law and a myriad of other things to try to fit this "union" into society. Companies would be required to pay retirement benefits to as many spouses as you have. It just doesn't fit our model of society. But if they wish to separately have their religious marriage to 5 people, I'm not going to throw them in jail for it.
Exactly!
 
Upvote 0

Mling

Knight of the Woeful Countenance (in training)
Jun 19, 2006
5,815
688
Here and there.
✟9,635.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Eventually, I would not be opposed to it, but I don't think our current beurocratic mess could handle it. It needs to be eased into.

Which probably won't happen, granted. America works on the system of making something legal (or possible) first, and then worrying about the consequences only after the box as been opened.
 
Upvote 0

crazyfingers

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2002
8,733
329
Massachusetts
Visit site
✟41,423.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Was there really ever an assumption that people would be married against their will?

I can only understand polygamy through what I know of monogamy, and I have never heard of people in the United States essentially told 'you're marrying me and you can do nothing about it.'

That's what happens in some off-shoot Mormon cults in the US. While it's illegal, underage girls are sometimes forced into polygamous situations against their will.

That said, I know of no reason to prohibit marriages where there are multiple wives or multiple husbands, provided that there is actually is free informed consent. It's not what I'd want for my life but so long as people enter into these things freely, I know of no reason to object.
 
Upvote 0