Which are the vast majority of scientists worldwide.
What's preventing the vast majority of scientists worldwide from accepting these publications?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Which are the vast majority of scientists worldwide.It's only the ToEite community that doesn't take this seriously,
What's preventing the vast majority of scientists worldwide from accepting these publications?there are scientists that understand this math and they publish this work.
Which are the vast majority of scientists worldwide.
What's preventing the vast majority of scientists worldwide from accepting these publications?
You need to explain why when doing the calculation of a random process that it matters when that random process occurs. Do you think that replication of DNA in the past was different than the replication of DNA today? Do you think the mathematical behavior of the replication and evolution of DNA in the Kishony and Lenski experiments is different than in other replicators? If so, how and why?I haven't referred to the Kishony experiment. I repeatedly told you what I was referring to. If you are having this much trouble following along then this will be a rather short conversation.
And the vast majority of scientists don't correctly explain the physics and mathematics of DNA evolution. If they did, they could correctly explain the mathematical behavior of the Kishony and Lenski experiment and how drug-resistance evolves, herbicide resistance, pesticide resistance, and how and why cancer treatments fail.Which are the vast majority of scientists worldwide.
What's preventing the vast majority of scientists worldwide from accepting these publications?
I think that one of the reasons atheists embrace the ToE so tightly as part of their doctrine is that they see this as justification that they have no accountability to God.
I'm still waiting for the atheist explanation of how the Kishony and Lenski experiments work. It appears that explaining how drug-resistance evolves is not in the atheist doctrine.It took 20 pages but we finally get the whole "Atheists accept the theory of evolution because they want to sin!".
I'm still waiting for the atheist explanation of how the Kishony and Lenski experiments work. It appears that explaining how drug-resistance evolves is not in the atheist doctrine.
Really? The Kishony and Lenski experiments don't work? You should contact them immediately and inform them that their experiments have failed. And while you are at it, you should explain to them how to make their experiments work.I don't really see why any atheist needs to, since you've never explained why the experiments don't work and why the theory of evolution doesn't work.
Although falling onto the old "Atheists accept the theory of evolution because they want to sin" canard really does mean that a lot of us, me included, do lose respect for you.
How self-serving and offensive. Atheists just plain don't believe that God exists and are thus not worried about accountability to Him. The rest of us just plain don't believe that our responsibility to God includes accepting a shallow and theologically inadequate interpretation of Genesis.I think that one of the reasons atheists embrace the ToE so tightly as part of their doctrine is that they see this as justification that they have no accountability to God.
Of course they worked. The conclusions which you draw from them not so much.Really? The Kishony and Lenski experiments don't work? You should contact them immediately and inform them that their experiments have failed. And while you are at it, you should explain to them how to make their experiments work.
Really? The Kishony and Lenski experiments don't work? You should contact them immediately and inform them that their experiments have failed. And while you are at it, you should explain to them how to make their experiments work.
The ToE doesn't work to explain these experiments that do work. Now, when Kishony tries to run his experiment with two drugs simultaneously, it doesn't work and you don't understand why and the ToE doesn't give that explanation either.I'm not making the claim that they don't work. You make the claim that they don't work, and the theory of evolution doesn't work. You're the one who's been claiming to have all the answers.
The ToE doesn't work to explain these experiments that do work. Now, when Kishony tries to run his experiment with two drugs, it doesn't work and you don't understand why and the ToE doesn't give that explanation either.
It took 20 pages but we finally get the whole "Atheists accept the theory of evolution because they want to sin!".
The reason I'm so "dead-focused" on the Kishony and Lenski experiments is that they are well-run demonstrations of the two processes of Darwinian evolution (competition and adaptation). There are very few real, measurable, and repeatable evolutionary experiments. There are lots of empirical examples of evolution in medicine and agriculture but they don't have the kind of measurements as found in these experiments such as identification of mutations, population sizes, and identification and control of specific selection conditions.Why are you so dead-focused on Kishony and Lenski? Do they owe you lunch money or something?
The reason I'm so "dead-focused" on the Kishony and Lenski experiments is that they are well-run demonstrations of the two processes of Darwinian evolution (competition and adaptation). There are very few real, measurable, and repeatable evolutionary experiments. There are lots of empirical examples of evolution in medicine and agriculture but they don't have the kind of measurements as found in these experiments such as identification of mutations, population sizes, and identification and control of specific selection conditions.
Now, I turn the question around, why are you so dead-set against these experiments? Why don't you make an attempt to understand how these experiments work?
If it wasn't this, you would find some other reason. You have your own reasons for not wanting to understand the physics and mathematics of evolution. If you don't want to accept my explanation, do your own research and figure it out yourself.
The first thing you need to learn is that DNA evolution for bacteria works the same way as for any other replicator. And to be more precise, what I have said is that Darwinian evolution is qualitatively correct but when you quantitate his theory, the notion the reptiles evolve into birds and fish evolve into mammals is mathematically irrational.But as experiments that use and are used to try and explain the theory of evolution with bacteria, a theory which you say is wrong and incorrect, then you by your own words say that their experiments are wrong.
I'm not dead-set against these experiments and I never have been. Personally, biological science has never been my real forte, history is more of my thing, so I only possess a slighter higher than high school level knowledge of biology. I do try my best and understand it, but a lot of the specifics do go over my head.
I don't mind.I've done my own research, or as much as I personally can in my own time and by my own effort, and I've seen enough to know that I can't really be swayed by one single person on the internet.
The first thing you need to learn is that DNA evolution for bacteria works the same way as for any other replicator. And to be more precise, what I have said is that Darwinian evolution is qualitatively correct but when you quantitate his theory, the notion the reptiles evolve into birds and fish evolve into mammals is mathematically irrational.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?