If the earth did pass through a liquid state, like it did according to the theory of planetary evolution, the earth must be completely stratiform. So then you have a major problem because you have a stratiform earth with an outer Sinak (silicon, sodium, and potassium) crust. fancy that.
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Planetary evolution?
- Thread starter AlHailThePowerOfJesusName
- Start date
- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,070
- 16,821
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
There is no theory of planetary evolution. The current theory on how the Earth formed is planetary accretion. It would never have been liquid per se. The layering we seem to see in the Earth is consistent with the accretionary model.
Upvote
0
Captain_Jack_Sparrow
Well-Known Member
The original post is a prime example of 'a little knowledge is a dangerous thing'.
Upvote
0
LewisWildermuth
Senior Veteran
Where the heck did you get this? There is no "Theory of Planetary Evolution" and no where in the current theories of how the earth was formed is it necessary for the Earth to have ever passed through a "liquid state".AlHailThePowerOfJesusName said:
Who ever is telling you this stuff has never cracked open a book about astrophysics in their lives... Or at least never bothered to do more than look at the pretty pictures of one...
Upvote
0
Late_Cretaceous
<font color="#880000" ></font&g
YOu do realize of course that if current observations contradict scientific theories, the theories are discareded or re-evaluated. So, if the model of planetary formation contradicted basic scientific obseravtions, it wouldn't be used. THAT is how science works.
Upvote
0
... the new york academy of science.
fine use the technical term.
dude do you even know what you are saying?
duh.
My Reference is the New York Academy of Sciences Second Conference on Planetology and Space Mission planning!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Somehow I think the scientists in that conference have much more credibility than anyone here.
Upvote
0
Found it!! GOOD GOD! That is from 1969. All hail you are REALLY reading some old stuff 
Volume 163/1
(Sep 1969) : Second Conference on Planetology and Space Mission Planning
Volume 163/1
(Sep 1969) : Second Conference on Planetology and Space Mission Planning
Upvote
0
I asked for your help and you remained silent and held your breath. The problem was I was looking in the last TWO DECADES but it was MUCH father back that!!!! LOL. This is not even current info!! Why are you reading articles from 1969?? Why don't you fast forward 34 years and join us.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
