- Feb 7, 2004
- 27,738
- 3,738
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
There are Christians here who believe in physical healing in the atonement (PHIA). Some Christians (I won't refer to what group they belong to) believe that in faith that God will heal their bodies as they have that God l forgave their sins. They believe that Christ redeemed them from their sins and that they believe that He redeemed them from their sicknesses also. Christians need not be sick because 1 Peter 2:24 says that we are already healed. If we are sick it is because of a lack of the right kind of knowledge which is close to mysticism or gnosticism teachings.
One teacher said:
The problem is that 1 Peter 2:24 is not about physical healing. Not only is the first part of the verse about the forgiveness of sins, the next verse also explains Peter's meaning: "For you were continually straying like sheep, but now you have returned to the Shepherd and Guardian of your souls" (1 Peter 2:25).
In fact, there is no mention of bodily sickness anywhere in 1 Peter 2. Doctrines can captivate people with some kind of idolatry (i.e. healing, wealth, etc). They are oblivious to the real world of God's truth; rather, they are plugged into a dream world of fantasy. In chapter 2, Peter gave an extended warning about the danger of false teachers and the corruption that would infiltrate the church as those who professed to know the living God through their doctrines.
Let's look at sickness, in the sense that all sickness is linked to sin, because if there were no sin, there would be no sickness. But it is wrong in assuming that a person became directly sick from being sinful. In John 9:2-3, Jesus and His disciples encountered a blind man. His disciples asked Him, Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind? Neither this man nor his parents sinned, said Jesus, but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life. Satan sometimes causes illness (Job 2:7; Luke 13:16). I take the Bible seriously and I agree that God hates suffering. Jesus spent much of His time relieving it during His three year ministry. Regarding doctrines of healing and suffering, the Bible does not teach that He will always physically, emotionally and mentally heal those who come to Him in faith. His sovereignty reserves the right to heal or not to heal as He sees fit (1 Peter 3:17, 1 Peter 4:19, 1 Thessalonians 5:18).
In the Old Testament Leviticus 9:7 Moses said to Aaron, "Come to the altar and sacrifice your sin offering and your burnt offering and make atonement for yourself and the people; sacrifice the offering that is for the people and make atonement for them, as the LORD has commanded."
Hebrews 5 explains that "Every high priest is selected from among men and is appointed to represent them in matters related to God, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins" that in Hebrews 7 explains that Jesus is the "high priest meets our needone who is holy, blameless, pure, set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens.
The bottom line is: SIN as in eternal death. Christ through His blood gave us eternal LIFE.
Animal sacrifices were to cover their sins while Christ's sacrifice to purifies our sins.
Exodus 29:36 "Sacrifice a bull each day as a sin offering to make atonement. Purify the altar by making atonement for it, and anoint it to consecrate it."
Leviticus 9:7 "Moses said to Aaron, "Come to the altar and sacrifice your sin offering and your burnt offering and make atonement for yourself and the people; sacrifice the offering that is for the people and make atonement for them, as the LORD has commanded."
Hebrews 9:14 How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!
Hebrews 9:15 For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritancenow that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.
We live in a body that is decaying and dying which is temporal. If our bodies are decaying as Paul said, where does it say we are physically whole while our bodies are slowly dying?
There are some teachers often state that Jesus also died to deliver us from our diseases and be healed as well as be forgiven from sins. I truly believe that most Christians do not believe that concept of doctrine.
PLEASE, in order to "discuss" this, do NOT refer by name of who teaches such doctrines but rather, we are to discuss the "doctrines" without any attachment to any one who believes in such doctrines. (Moderators, please edit any posts that list specifically to a person, group, movement, church or anyone from the posts).
The focus is: DOCTRINE, not who teaches or believes in them.
One teacher said:
"The best method by which you can be healed is to know for yourself from our text Scriptures (Isaiah 53:4,5, Matthew 8:17, and First Peter 2:24) that healing is in God's redemptive plan; it belongs to you; and by His stripes we are healed. We refuse to allow disease of sickness in our bodies, because we ARE healed. We know that the pain, sickness, or disease that seems to be in our bodies was laid on Jesus. He bore it. We do not need to bear it. All we need to do is agree with God and His Word and accept the fact that "himself took our infirmities, and bare our sicknesses" and "with his stripes we are healed." . . . All believers should thoroughly understand that their healing was consummated in Christ. When they come to know that in their spirits - just as they know it in their heads - that will be the end of sickness and disease in their bodies."
The problem is that 1 Peter 2:24 is not about physical healing. Not only is the first part of the verse about the forgiveness of sins, the next verse also explains Peter's meaning: "For you were continually straying like sheep, but now you have returned to the Shepherd and Guardian of your souls" (1 Peter 2:25).
In fact, there is no mention of bodily sickness anywhere in 1 Peter 2. Doctrines can captivate people with some kind of idolatry (i.e. healing, wealth, etc). They are oblivious to the real world of God's truth; rather, they are plugged into a dream world of fantasy. In chapter 2, Peter gave an extended warning about the danger of false teachers and the corruption that would infiltrate the church as those who professed to know the living God through their doctrines.
Let's look at sickness, in the sense that all sickness is linked to sin, because if there were no sin, there would be no sickness. But it is wrong in assuming that a person became directly sick from being sinful. In John 9:2-3, Jesus and His disciples encountered a blind man. His disciples asked Him, Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind? Neither this man nor his parents sinned, said Jesus, but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life. Satan sometimes causes illness (Job 2:7; Luke 13:16). I take the Bible seriously and I agree that God hates suffering. Jesus spent much of His time relieving it during His three year ministry. Regarding doctrines of healing and suffering, the Bible does not teach that He will always physically, emotionally and mentally heal those who come to Him in faith. His sovereignty reserves the right to heal or not to heal as He sees fit (1 Peter 3:17, 1 Peter 4:19, 1 Thessalonians 5:18).
In the Old Testament Leviticus 9:7 Moses said to Aaron, "Come to the altar and sacrifice your sin offering and your burnt offering and make atonement for yourself and the people; sacrifice the offering that is for the people and make atonement for them, as the LORD has commanded."
Hebrews 5 explains that "Every high priest is selected from among men and is appointed to represent them in matters related to God, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins" that in Hebrews 7 explains that Jesus is the "high priest meets our needone who is holy, blameless, pure, set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens.
The bottom line is: SIN as in eternal death. Christ through His blood gave us eternal LIFE.
Animal sacrifices were to cover their sins while Christ's sacrifice to purifies our sins.
Exodus 29:36 "Sacrifice a bull each day as a sin offering to make atonement. Purify the altar by making atonement for it, and anoint it to consecrate it."
Leviticus 9:7 "Moses said to Aaron, "Come to the altar and sacrifice your sin offering and your burnt offering and make atonement for yourself and the people; sacrifice the offering that is for the people and make atonement for them, as the LORD has commanded."
Hebrews 9:14 How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!
Hebrews 9:15 For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritancenow that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.
We live in a body that is decaying and dying which is temporal. If our bodies are decaying as Paul said, where does it say we are physically whole while our bodies are slowly dying?
There are some teachers often state that Jesus also died to deliver us from our diseases and be healed as well as be forgiven from sins. I truly believe that most Christians do not believe that concept of doctrine.
PLEASE, in order to "discuss" this, do NOT refer by name of who teaches such doctrines but rather, we are to discuss the "doctrines" without any attachment to any one who believes in such doctrines. (Moderators, please edit any posts that list specifically to a person, group, movement, church or anyone from the posts).
The focus is: DOCTRINE, not who teaches or believes in them.
