- Apr 17, 2018
- 6,713
- 2,297
- Country
- Italy
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I guess sanctification can be said to be progressive.The concept of Entire Sanctification is something that the Nazarene and other holiness churches have changed their definition on many times. Today's definition which in my opinion is the more biblical one is that when someone has become born again and is saved they then begin the gradual process of the Holy Spirit sanctifying them or becoming more mature in love and motivation while also gradually getting rid of the sin nature. While perfection can never be achieved in this life it is the objective of every believer to become as holy as possible and to keep growing in grace. Personally I think a more appropriate term should be progressive sanctification because one will not ever encounter or achieve entire sanctification until after we die a physical death and our spiritual body then goes to Heaven where we really will be perfect in every aspect because of what Jesus did by dying for us on the cross and freeing us from the penalty of sin.
Catholics do call it progressive justification.
But sanctification just simply means what you've stated.....being set aside for God's use..or works for God. Works has become a bad word. So since the use lasts our whole life, it should suffice, but maybe the word progressive would help to explain it better.
I am brought to the conclusion,however, that maybe our churches don't even have theology correct.
How could theology change?
If JWesley believed in eradication of the sin nature...why have we changed our mind? Has it become to difficult for us to even consider this?
OTOH, I do some studying with a friar (?) at a sanctuary and he always says that everyone sins and always will. Which is what makes sense to me...even though, of course, it will be cut down considerably both due to the fact that we become more aware of sin...and we desire to sin less.
Thanks for a good post.
Upvote
0