That's the evolutionist's way of avoiding the validity of the issue- taking a gargantuan, theory breaking issue and bandaging it up with an extremely asinine excuse to walk away and continue on.
Well this is awkward. I was going to make a point about how that's the Christian's way of avoiding addressing a valid response, by simply making an ad-hominem about the person who made it. It seems you beat me to that one. Anyway...
I hate to tell you this, but it's not a gargantuan issue, and hardly theory breaking. Really, it was addressed (again) about 10 years ago (a year after Behe brought it to the forefront again), and hasn't had any new developments since. In fact, when Behe presented irreducible complexity at the Dover trial he conceded that he had no evidence to support his argument. All the more concerning Behe didn't make his argument against evolution in a scientific journal, or in the scientific community, but in a court of law...and still it was rejected.
When you were presented with this "gargantuan, theory breaking issue" did you bother to look over the response to it? It's more or less what I responded with. What about the argument of irreducible complexity? Do you really understand what it is? What about abiogenesis, or evolution?
Speaking of mutations:
It takes 50000 mutation to go from land to sea, how many of these mutations are beneficial?
The answer is none. They were all completely and utterly useless.
I don't know, if it got from land to sea, something must have been useful.
Darwin's Black Box. The species of finches were simply oscillating. Evolution is mathematically absurd because physics and probability simply do not allow for it. Just like it's possible that all the air molecules in the room will go to one side, don't count on it ever happening in a finite universe.
It's mathematically absurd because of physics? So does that mean we're changing disciplines? It's not math, it's physics! What then is the absurdity from physics?
I also feel the need to point out, that finches are hardly a fundamental point. They are a seed on a leaf of a branch on the evolutionary tree.
Yes. First we were stupid, and then we were smart. It happened instantly. Go ask an evolutionist. Better yet, go pull up the actual theories they've developed. It's hilarious.
It happened "instantly"? I've never heard that. I've heard quite the opposite. When was this instant "smartification"? How long have we been "smart"? Can you give a citation for these claims?
Am I safe in assuming that your alternative theory is that a mysterious being "blinked" us, the Earth, the universe, and well...everything into existence?