Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just thinking of something inspired by this thread.
If a denomination practiced communion being open to all baptized Christians, but did not recognize paedo-baptism, I wonder what they do if presented with a baptized infant or small child for communion ... ?
I'm saying they are connected and interdependent. The priest has the charism to, among other things, relate to the bishop and the laity as a conveyor of the laying on of hands. Can he do so without the bishop? No, but counterfactual dependence only gets you so far. It also takes a priest for a priest to do it. In the Latin churches, priests are not typically seen as having this charism within the ministerial economy of the church because they are a step too far removed.
Also, for us Chrismation is the laying on of hands for the reception of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.
Thank you, MKJ. I was not completely sure of every group, so I wasn't sure what I was imagining.I think almost without exception, groups like that have a non-sacramental view of communion.
Yes, Catholic think that education of youth should get done. How silly of them. We have followed the guidance of those who teach. Their guidance is that if confirmation were during infancy, many parents would not give their children an exposure to the Church over several years.
So, yes their is a pastoral problem in many, many churches. The congregations are getter older as relatively few youth are brought up in the Church, or even exposed to the Church for very long. Catholics have chosen to DEAL with the issue by continuing to have communion at 7 or 8, with required classes before, and have confirmation at 15 or so, with required classes before. We can look at the results. In our town of 40,000, a new Catholic high school has been opened.
Criticize all you wish. In the US, Roman Catholics are getting their children exposed to the Church over many years. Also, parents attend Church while their children are young and are part of the life of the Church. Perhaps, all the other traditional churches don't have any problems with Sunday attendance, or not.
In the end, I don't think that making "perfect" theological choices (through choosing one theological opinion or another) needs to get in the way of pastoral concerns.
==========
And just BTW, attendance is fine in Catholic churches. Most of this is because of being open to immigrants (well, for non OBOB members). Much also is due to children being exposed to the faith and being part of your classes and groups.
ANASTASIA ! - wow what a question ? It's certainly an interesting one.
There are enough problems with some Latin Catholic Priests being most unwilling to Commune young EC children. No matter how it is explained to them that it is permitted and indeed encouraged - they seem afraid that it could cause scandal.
MKJ
Sadly I think that if we are really honest - to many RC Parents the later Administration of the Sacrament of Confirmation is seen by many of them as being a Rite of passage - once it's done then it's over and done with.
I well remember what I heard an RC Cardinal say when he visited a Parish to talk with parents before the preparation for Confirmation started. The hall was just about full [ a large parish and 3 primary Schools attached to it ] and the Cardinal, as he entered the Hall, turned to the parish priest and said something similar to this " You know Father X - there are very probably parents here that you've never seen in Church and you will next see them at the Confirmation Mass and then you'll never see them again till their funeral. "
Where did you hear that the current practice of the west is the older tradition? In the fourth century Apostolic Confessions, it provides the rubric for children to receive. I could be wrong with the origins (though I know the origin of children communing was very early), so could you provide your source for that? That said, even western sources admit that stopping infant communion in the west was in the 12th century.I think your supposition here is just incorrect though. I don't think that is the reason for the difference. A much more obvious answer is that in the west they chose to maintain the older practice, and in the east they did not - neither seems to have considered the other "wrong." There are a plethora of good pastoral and practical reasons that would influence how chose to deal with the issue of larger diocese where bishops could lay hands on for every child. I would be inclined to look first at demographic questions.
Mark, I have to ask if you choose to read things into posts deliberately. I've never suggested that education is a bad thing.
You yourself have said that the parents are NOT interested in education - they need to be bullied into it by making it a requirement to have the sacrament, and then they often are not seen at church much afterward. That is - they have a sense that the objective aspect of the sacrament needs to get done without a strong feeling about the other aspects of discipleship that we would expect to go with it. I would suggest there is a somewhat similar attitude to the Eucharist in many Catholic parishes - hence the exodus that often follows distribution.
It's not a criticism from me so much as an observation - I have heard it as a criticism, however, from a great many Catholics who despair about getting kids and parents really interested and invested in education and even just weekly participation. That's a problem in many denominations, some more than others, but the solution of requiring it for kids to be confirmed is a solution more often seen in Catholic parishes. I'm not sure how successful it's really been though, the kids go, but often that's the end of the line.
We are the same as you, in this respect Anastasia - I was wondering more about the Churches in the Anglican Communion and the others
We are the same as you, in this respect Anastasia - I was wondering more about the Churches in the Anglican Communion and the others
Where did you hear that the current practice of the west is the older tradition? In the fourth century Apostolic Confessions, it provides the rubric for children to receive. I could be wrong with the origins (though I know the origin of children communing was very early), so could you provide your source for that? That said, even western sources admit that stopping infant communion in the west was in the 12th century.
http://catholicbridge.com/orthodox/why_cant_babies_receive_eucharist.php
OK, let me explore a bit further.
Yes, the parents are bullied into their children going to classes through confirmation. In that time, the parents are also bullied into taking their children to Church. It is thought by educators that this is better than not giving the children and young parents this exposure to the Church. In this time, many children grow in their faith. As has been the case in the US for ages, children often now evangelize their parents. Also, some of the parents become better exposed to the Church as they are part of various youth groups, including helping in education.
Yes, of course, many children and parents leave after confirmation. The educators in the US find the situation preferable to parents and children leaving after baptism. Baptist and non-denominational folks have a different approach. Children are expected to be in youth groups into their teens, when curiously enough they come forward and become part of their church. We can this last initiation rite "confirmation"; Baptists call it "baptism". And Baptists are starting to have naming or welcoming ceremonies for infants. Here on CF, we often get caught up in the details of theology. That is not what happens on the ground, in the local churches. We are communities taking our best shot at welcoming our children into the faith, and preparing them to face the world. As yes, when they leave for college, they will face the world, and often not come back to the church of their youth.
In the US, we have our ways. The rest of the world has different ways. The practical approaches of our churches are very similar. We have 1/3 or more of our adult going to church on a given weekend. For those in the Philippines, this is terrible. For those in Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, they wonder how we have so many participating.
I am NOT one who thinks that the US where Christianity is dead because we have so many church denominations. Rather, I compare us to others, and see that perhaps our approach does indeed work. We are a nation of seekers. Yes, many have examined their faith and left the churches. Are there really fewer folks in the churches than 100 years ago. Do we understand the faith less than they did. Personally, I do NOT think so. We are very confused at the nostalgic period after WWII when so many were in our churches, blissful and not examining anything. I was alive then. I remember. I much prefer the 21st Century and its approach, built on freedom and respect of those from all races, creeds, and faith communities. We don't have a state Church, and IMHO have been much better for that choice.
Ah thank you for the clarification. My bad with not reading the post you quoted more carefully.Confirmation by the bishop directly is the older practice. When that became impractical, the east delegated it to the priest. The west continued to have the bishop come, but not present for every baptism.
Dude. Why would you call it 'pedo-communion'. That conjures up some weird images...Jesus said to "Let the little children come unto Me ... the Kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these."
Considering that in our Church, to fail to receive communion is to basically excommunicate oneself, why would we excommunicate our children?
And considering that we hold the Eucharist to be the Body and Blood of Christ, why would we deny His sustenance to our children?
Dude. Why would you call it 'pedo-communion'. That conjures up some weird images...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?