fhansen
Oldbie
- Sep 3, 2011
- 15,452
- 3,865
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
It has nothing-at all-to do with plan A or plan B or plan C. Some maintain that God shifted plans, to plan B, after Adam sinned, as if God didn't know that would occur. But that's not true of course-there's only one plan. And that plan is much greater than merely stocking some of His otherwise wretched sinful creation in heaven while damning the rest. God’s plan has always been singular: to produce something, something grand and good and noble, something better than He began with. Essential parts of this production are 1) grace, and 2) our willingness to respond to and cooperate with that grace, with this work of His. So, He doesn’t do it apart from us. He’s in the business of producing something like Himself, and we may or may not wish to go along with the program. We’re sort of like flowers who don’t orchestrate their own blossoming, but who can thwart it. We have a telos, a purpose, and to the extent that we know God and love Him with our whole heart, soul, mind, and strength and our neighbor as ourselves, that purpose is fulfilled. Then perfect, unending peace, joy, happiness would be ours, incidentally, and this is what God has always wanted for man. We just cannot do it apart from Him. Adam had thought otherwise. We’re here to learn how wrong he was, to learn how right God is.Neither the Law nor the Gospel was designed to immediately bring an end to injustice in the world. Rather, they reached out to people who were willing at the time, regardless of the fact some would reject them and regardless of whether the entire society rejected them at some point in their history.
I could hold a glass of cold water out to you and to a group, and the offering would prove its worth when you accept it and when the society accepts it. It may not solve the problem of thirst for all time but that does not thereby make the gift worthless or a failure.
Not even if in the future you reject this gift does it mean the offering was a failure because at one time you did accept it. And even if the society as a whole rejects the glass of water that doesn't mean the offering was fraudulent, a failure, or worthless--some did accept it, and at one time even the whole group benefited from it. The fact it was not a permanent fix for thirst does not invalidate the gift.
That's the way it was with the Law, and that's the way it is with the Gospel. Neither was has been a failure, and the fact the Law fell short of a permanent fix did not mean it lacked validity.
Adam fell and this world, where good and evil are literally known, is actually the first step back to God. Man needs to learn that God exists, that we're not Him-and why it’s important to make that distinction and to believe in, hope, in and love Him first above all else. God chose a dusty little corner of the world within which to work out His plan in and through man, to patiently educate and form man. He demonstrated His power and opposition towards sin/evil, He gave them the law to define and deny our right to commit sin/evil, so that we’ll know that this world, where man’s will reigns apart from God, isn’t how things should be- while showing us how things should be. Through the law we learn how lawless we are, how we fail to be who we were created to be. The final step is to show us how to actually become the person we were created to be. And this begins with coming to truly know God and be increasingly aligned in will with His.
“Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.” John 17:3
To know God is to know His love, because He first loved us, and so to love Him in return. That love includes His forgiveness, which Jesus demonstrated in no uncertain terms. The atonement not only satisfied God’s requirements for justice, but simultaneously demonstrated His overarching ineffable love for mankind, since He died for us, with a love that has always existed- from the beginning. God is love; He wants the same for us. And that love is both a gift and a choice. The beginning of all this is faith, the simple acknowledgment of His existence, goodness, trustworthiness, and of our need for Him.
From the big picture we find a big plan, of ongoing creation, God having created His universe “en statu viae”, in a state of journeying, as it’s been said, to a purpose and perfection that He has created us for.
In a word, “legalism” is why Paul’s righteousness was insufficient; it wasn’t even authentic righteousness at all. We can obey externally while still being filthy on the inside, referencing Matt 5 beginning with verse 21 as well as Matt 23. To put it another way, love was still missing with Paul, as it was missing with Adam to begin with, incidentally. That’s what God’s plan means to cultivate in us. The law reflects that love but cannot, of itself, produce it. Only a humble turning to God can do that. And with that love our righteousness easily begins to surpass that of the Pharisees and teachers of the law BTW (Matt 5:20).You have to explain *why* Paul's righteousness as a Pharisee was insufficient. Was it because the original role of Pharisee was corrupt, or was it because the Pharisees at some point lost their way?
If a lawyer is corrupt should we say that the man failed because he was a lawyer? No. Neither should we say Paul failed righteousness simply because he held a religious office while under the Law. The Law was a perfectly acceptable system, as Jesus himself said. Jesus even said the Jews of his time should follow their teaching, when it corresponded with the Law.
It is not being under the Law that makes a man unrighteous. The Law was God's perfect standard for Israel at the time. Rather, the Law simply showed that Man was already a sinner even before he came under the Law. The Law was designed to remedy the separation between God and sinner in a temporary way, until final redemption had been won.
Jews could not obtain eternal Salvation while under the Law not because they were unrighteous but rather because their record of righteousness had to be dealt with by the grace of Christ's atonement. Their flaws, keeping them from the Tree of Life, had to be erased. And that could not come by human works, but only by Christ's works. A perfect man and a divine man was necessary to forgive sinful Man his sin.
“I will put my law in their minds
and write it on their hearts.
I will be their God,
and they will be my people.
No longer will they teach their neighbor,
or say to one another, ‘Know the Lord,’
because they will all know me,
from the least of them to the greatest,”
declares the Lord.
“For I will forgive their wickedness
and will remember their sins no more.” Jer 31:33-34
Last edited:
Upvote
0