Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
*yawn*
I've got it made. I'm neither Pauline nor non-Pauline. I'm sort of both, just like Paul was to every man.Wait...
I think I'm confused. What's a Christian again??
I just don't know anymore.
But the thread is based on a debate of Paul.
The main question should be.....does Pauls teaching fall in line with and further the gospel that Christ gave to the disciples to teach the nations of the World?
In my study, spiritually they do. But physically they don't. But he admits that. Many times.
The main question ... does Paul's teaching fall in line with the gospel that Messiah gave to His Disciples?
Your answer ... "physically (?) they don't. But he admits that. Many times."
The main question ... does Paul's teaching further (do you mean "add to") the gospel that Messiah gave to His Disciples?
My answer ... Yes !!
RedRose
Hosea 2:
7 ... then shall she say, "I will go and return to my first husband; for then was it better with me than now."
14 Therefore, behold, I will allure her, and bring her into the wilderness, and speak comfortably unto her.
19 And I will betroth thee unto Me for ever ...
Hosea 4:
6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge ...
((who is this?))
RedRose
Who was the husband of the "old marriage"?The Marriage of Jesus to Israel (church) could only happen in the New Covenant promised to Israel AFTER the OLD MARRIAGE WAS ENDED BY THE DEATH OF THE HUSBAND.
My Gospel is Messiah's Gospel, not Paul's gospel.So those who reject the Gospel, as from Paul, are usually those as above who killed the Christians with their ignorance and hard hearts.
You have posted an excellent answer and question. However, your belief that Paul is saying the same thing may not be correct. It would be easier to respond to your post if you would provide a Chapter and verse to back up your statement.
Thanks
I say, in my own opinion, that Paul wanted believers to obey Christ, the same as what Christ said. Paul did say, in Romans 6, What shall we say then? Shall we sin that grace abound? Certainly not! Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Certainly not! And so now present your members as slaves of righteousness for holiness.
What he said is certainly right and proper. So why did he then effectively say "but you can choose your own food, feasts, calendar or Sabbath" in Rom 14:13, 1 Cor 8:9, and Col 2:16? Of course people can do their own thing if they wish, if they are willing to risk the consequences. They certainly don't need Paul's approval to do it.
So why did he suggest it at all? Especially when there was no scriptural precedent? This is no small matter, because they are stumbling blocks of the highest order. The church has exercised them to the hilt, such that Paul's exhortation to righteousness in Romans 6 is now completely ignored, except on the rare occasions when Paul needs defending.
He's like a pastor who thunders "Do not drink! Do not gamble!" from the pulpit, while offering free alcohol and gambling machines in the church foyer. But a person who truly cares about their flock doesn't do those sorts of things. His advice is consistent, and if he sees confusion, he does his best to resolve it. He certainly doesn't add to it, like Paul with his 'one rule here, another rule there' approach. People's souls are much too precious for that.
The word "members" refers to bodily parts, not the membership.
My Gospel is Messiah's Gospel, not Paul's gospel.
So what does this mean for you? If you obey the commandments, heres what you'll experience:
So what is there not to like? Why hang onto Paul any longer? The ball is in your court.
- a closer relationship with Yeshua (Jesus);
- a more dynamic prayer life;
- much better understanding of the Bible, especially the difficult parts;
- an end to spiritual attack;
- better health;
- a greater sense of peace, safety, and the Holy spirit;
- the comfort of knowing that if things go bad, you have a much wider range of promises upon which to call;
- surprise that the commandments are so easy to learn and do nothing like the crushing burden that they claim in church!
TorahMan
Shalom, my friend.Hey netzarim. Just curious.
I understand how we have discussed Acts and the Pauline letters (for the Anti-Pauline Messianic theology).
But how does 2 Peter 3's statement fit into the belief?
15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
If Peter's acknowledging Paul in this respect, it seems sound. Do you have to dismiss it somehow? Like I said, not being smart, just trying to see what you see in it.
Shalom, my friend.
My tradition interprets it thus:
I thus interpret Peter here as warning the untaught and unstable who use Paul's words and certain Ketuvim writings to support their doctrines of lawlessnesses (v17) and so, as a result, fall from their steadfastness in Messiah.
- v15 "Brother" - are there not such a thing as false brothers?;
- v15 Beloved" - are we not to love everyone, even our enemies?;
- v15 "wisdom" - is there not a wisdom that is devilish (Jam 3:15)?;
- v16 "the rest of the scriptures" - my tradition understands as referring to"the rest of the Writings", e.g. Ketuvim;
So I see 2Peter 3:15-17 not as a statement in support of Paul, but a warning about him.
Fred V B,
Thank you again for an intelligent response. You said, In deed this is true. This was in essence to Peter's dream in Acts 10. What is not mentioned but I believe it is there under the radar is that these were known as the Noachide Laws. What they are is a set of 7 laws that gentiles were to follow since it was believed that the 613 Laws were not required for them. So this is basically what is being said in the letter Acts 15 in my opinion Notice it says, "If you...keep yourselves...". Remember that this is a letter to Paul. Which implies that he wasn't circumscribed. There is a problem with the Noachide laws that I see. Even though they are easy to follow they in essence keep the gentile from progressing in their lives due to a lack of Torah. This is my opinion so take it or leave it. I believe that if the gentile will really hold on to the True vine by following Torah as Yahushua did then our society as well as our world would be in a much better place. The book of Jubilees has some real interesting things to say about these laws as they pertaining to a vegetarian diet.
Thanks
How do you interpret Matthew 28:18-20?
The Red Rose,
Something He showed me this morning while reading your post;Look what happens when we remove the fourth letter from the name Barnabas, the n, we get the name Barabas! Acts 21:38 uses the Greek term sikarios (dagger men) for an "Egyptian" rebel who led "four thousand men ... out into the wilderness" three years before. The sikarios were worse then just robbers, they were murderer's who would go about the temple stabbing people with hidden daggers and then running off and hiding back into the crowd. 'He was a murderer from the beginning'. Much of this can be read at hebrew-streams. org
Most other sites won't tolerate those of us who have different views on Paul and Christianity. They may be tolerant for a time until they can convert us so to speak to their points of view. In other words they become like Paul liars, etcetera until they have manipulated us into buying into their BS. How could it be any different? Paul is the one they really follow and the fruit doesn't fall far from the tree. Or should I say its hard to kick against the pricks! Hee hee! So when we enter the lion's den it is we who are kicking against the pricks. I don't see the point of it. We can't convert them and they really don't care for our views? I just make my point and move on! If Yashua wants them to follow in His way he will guide them to where they need to be.
Good to be back
Charlie
So would you agree that Messiah in Mt 28:18-20 commanded that both ethnically Jewish and ethically Gentile believers are to observe the same things, that there is no distinction between either group? Additionally, do you recognize that all 12 apostles were here sent to teach the Gentiles?I think I have the right view of it, commandments that Christ taught are for all of us who are believers, that we are to do to follow him, and to teach.
In the days to come you are all going to find out the the vengeance of YHVH against the Christians, so be very careful with your pity as it will blind your discernment. I tell you truly Yahshua considers Christianity no less than the belly of the beast. As a matter of fact try this on for size for all of you who still seem to desire to use the word christ. Christians hate really inspired spiritual TRUTH.
Michael
I have to agree with you Michael, regarding the level of wrath which YHVH has against the church of Paul. It's not going to be nice for them at all, yet there's not the slightest sense of concern. Oh well, their lesson is coming. I'm not saying the non-Paul crowd is perfect, but at least we are teachable and happy to do what YHVH asks, even to the wearing of tzitzit. And obedience like that makes a huge difference.
Shaun
One thing He did say was this concerning the Christians, 'Away from ME you filthy cowards, you make ME sick.' And I'll tell you what, they fled from His presence in complete and utter terror.
So if anyone wants to post this over there, feel totally welcome, and if they want to disparage the visions then they are only fulfilling their miserable destiny.
Michael
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?