Of all the ancient Christians outside the Bible, few are so readily claimed as their own as St. Patrick, the Apostle to the Irish. Catholics and Orthodox claim him as one of their own, as do some Baptists, Holiness, Pentecostals, and even SDA's. Common among these Protestant groups is the assertion that Patrick was "certainly" not the Catholic he has been painted to be, and that that Church has merely co-opted him after the fact due to popular demand or "Roman domination" or some such. My question is, when reading the two extant writings we have from him (leaving alone the legends and lives written after his death), where does the reader find that he was anything but Catholic (or Orthodox, as the two were one)? This rather bothers me, as I've heard it surprisingly much.