• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Passion parties

Paradoxum

Liberty, Equality, Solidarity!
Sep 16, 2011
10,712
654
✟35,688.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Oh I agree. Just like spouses should give each other their bodies, some can take it the extreme of "Give me sex or else!" kind things. Which sadly some christian man rape their wives for sex because they take that verse to the extreme.

I'm not comfortable with rules like "spouses should give each other their bodies". I think relationships should be relational, not rule based. It should be based on care, understanding, and love for the other, not on having sex just because they rules in a book say so. One's Love should be treated as a person, not as part property, and not as a sex doll.

I'm not saying you think like that, I'm just saying why I don't like that phrasing. One should treat the other with consideration and care for their thoughts, feelings and desires, rather than simply doing it because the book says so.

I hope you don't take this a criticism of you, because I don't mean that. :)
 
Upvote 0

Joykins

free Crazy Liz!
Jul 14, 2005
15,720
1,181
55
Down in Mary's Land
✟44,390.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I'm not comfortable with rules like "spouses should give each other their bodies". I think relationships should be relational, not rule based. It should be based on care, understanding, and love for the other, not on having sex just because they rules in a book say so. One's Love should be treated as a person, not as part property, and not as a sex doll.

I'm not saying you think like that, I'm just saying why I don't like that phrasing. One should treat the other with consideration and care for their thoughts, feelings and desires, rather than simply doing it because the book says so.

I hope you don't take this a criticism of you, because I don't mean that. :)

I have a problem with the part where it says the husband and wife shouldn't abstain from sex except by mutual agreement for a period of time. Since I agree with a consent-based ethic, I think a spouse should always have the ability to turn down sex for any reason.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
My point more or less that if you want to have sex, then it should be with your spouse. Your sexy toy should not be the first thing that pops into your mind.

I don't think anyone here is saying that sex toys should replace sex with one's spouse altogether. Merely that there's nothing wrong with having sex toys in addition to regular sex.

If a woman is avoiding sex with her husband altogether, it's not sex toys that are the problem. It's the relationship.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0

HighwayMan

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2007
2,831
257
✟17,627.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
It's the reason why I can't identify with the majority of the Christian community either - it is just as obsessed with sex as the rest of society, but it just attaches some silly waiting game thinking that somehow it "pleases" God. Proof of what a joke it is is the fact that Christian marriages end up in divorce as often, or even more often, then secular ones. There is nothing special or holy about the majority of them.
 
Upvote 0

Paradoxum

Liberty, Equality, Solidarity!
Sep 16, 2011
10,712
654
✟35,688.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I have a problem with the part where it says the husband and wife shouldn't abstain from sex except by mutual agreement for a period of time. Since I agree with a consent-based ethic, I think a spouse should always have the ability to turn down sex for any reason.

:thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,636
22,275
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟588,770.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
I have 2 friends that are supposed to be Christians that have Passion Parties. I didn't know what this was until I did a search online. Now I am very upset with them. In my opinion this would be like me distributing pornography to other men. Do I have a reason to be concerned or am I just over-reacting? :doh:

You are overreacting, not only by asking yourself about being concerned, but that you doubt their religion because they buy sex toys is ridiculous to the max. What is this I don't even...

Thou shallt not use vibrators, except the pink ones with the bunny ears.
 
  • Like
Reactions: selfinflikted
Upvote 0

CounselorForChrist

Senior Veteran
Aug 24, 2010
6,576
237
✟23,292.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I have a problem with the part where it says the husband and wife shouldn't abstain from sex except by mutual agreement for a period of time. Since I agree with a consent-based ethic, I think a spouse should always have the ability to turn down sex for any reason.
Problem with that is even non-christians studies have shown deny sex to much leads the spouse to feel neglected and hence cheating happens. Obviously I am not saying the person should cheat. But why tempt fate (as one would say)?

I've met many wives who rarely have sex with their husband simply because they don't want to for any number of reasons. Granted this gets into a billion other details such as maybe the wife has her period and doesn't want to have sex. So he should respect that. Or maybe shes just not satisfied so the husband should learn what does satisfy her in bed...etc.

I think alot of non-christians assume the saying about don't deny each other means you can forable have sex if denied. But thats not what it means. If anything its rape at that point. But what its saying is humans like sex. If your married don't use sex as a weapon.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
I've met many wives who rarely have sex with their husband simply because they don't want to for any number of reasons.

The reason is almost certainly not that she is able to touch on her own.

Rather, it is almost certainly that the relationship is falling apart and there are deep issues that need to be addressed. It's not because she "doesn't want to have sex". Rather, it's because she no longer wants to have sex with the individual that is her husband.

Truth.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0

Cearbhall

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2013
15,118
5,744
United States
✟129,824.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Problem with that is even non-christians studies have shown deny sex to much leads the spouse to feel neglected and hence cheating happens. Obviously I am not saying the person should cheat. But why tempt fate (as one would say)?
If someone cheats because there are times when his or her partner truly doesn't want to have sex, then that person doesn't deserve to be in a relationship. Hopefully the partner finds out about the cheating and ends the relationship.
 
Upvote 0

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,498
157
44
Atlanta, GA
✟31,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I think there is a reasonable threshold between what's okay and what isn't. For example, the pastor of a former church I attended, his wife sells sex toys and he talks up her business from the pulpit. Can you imagine?! A pastor encouraging women in his congregation to buy vibrators from his wife!

This is just me, but I think sex toys party are kind of gross. I went to one once with my sister and it was just a bunch of raunchy talk that had nothing to do with enhancing marital relations and was more of a nasty gossip fest about "boring husbands" and "husbands who can't keep it up". At one point the consultant walked around smearing some sort of edible lube all over everyone's arms and told us to lick them off. I was like, "uh, no". My sister did it and ended up sick, throwing up all night. I mean, do we really need penis shaped sugar cookies?

Another thing is that this should be something couples do together, not something shared between gal pals. What happens in your bedroom should be your business, not your co-workers' and friends'. If you absolutely must use sex toys, it should be something the two partners agree upon and purchase together in a discreet manner.

But that's just me. I'm not a prude, but I think what takes place behind closed doors between my husband and I is sacred and not subject for raunchy gossip at a friend's house.
 
Upvote 0

KitKatMatt

stupid bleeding heart feminist liberal
May 2, 2013
5,818
1,602
✟37,020.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Sugar cookies of any kind is a good thing!

I wonder, are prices lower for goods in passion parties than in stores? It seems like the perfect place to jack up prices, but then again these things are super expensive anyways. Hmm, more research is needed.
 
Upvote 0

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,498
157
44
Atlanta, GA
✟31,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sugar cookies of any kind is a good thing!

I wonder, are prices lower for goods in passion parties than in stores? It seems like the perfect place to jack up prices, but then again these things are super expensive anyways. Hmm, more research is needed.

They're like most other multi-level marketing scheme home parties. The biggest discount is for the hostess of the party.

ETA: Sugar cookies are awesome, but something about using teeth on anything that resembles a phallus is just...no. :cool:
 
Upvote 0

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,498
157
44
Atlanta, GA
✟31,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What about bananas?

Eh, the first thing I think of when I eat a banana isn't "penis". I'm talking about candies and cookies and other edibles that are distinctly peen shaped.
 
Upvote 0

Cute Tink

Blah
Site Supporter
Nov 22, 2002
19,570
4,622
✟147,891.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
FYI, to the OP and other people unfamiliar with Passion Parties (I have been to 3, all with different hostesses), the ordering is often done in private and the hostess does not get to discuss your purchases with the other customers without your consent. There are plenty of items available for couples that encourage intimacy (like massage oils and other massage implements), not just sex toys.
 
Upvote 0