Papal Pull Infallible?

[JM]

Was the Pope wrong to slap the woman's hand? I mean, he did apologize, this sets the example...doesn't it?

Is the Papal "Pull" Infallible?

 

[Deus Vult!]

Was the Pope wrong to slap the woman's hand? I mean, he did apologize, this sets the example...doesn't it?

Is the Papal "Pull" Infallible?

Papal Infallibility is only taking place when the Bishop of Rome speaks with regard to faith and morals "Ex Cathedra" or 'from the chair of St.Peter.'
Only 2 Popes - in 2000 years of history - have spoken "Ex Cathedra", and both times was with regard to Mariology.

 

[JM]

Papal Infallibility is only taking place when the Bishop of Rome speaks with regard to faith and morals "Ex Cathedra" or 'from the chair of St.Peter.'
Only 2 Popes - in 2000 years of history - have spoken "Ex Cathedra", and both times was with regard to Mariology.

Yeah, I was being sarcastic.

I don't blame the old guy for slapping her hand but he apologized, he's the pope, Catholics should follow his example and allow woman to pull old people around.

 

[Original Happy Camper]

Thus, Popes have made many, many infallible pronouncements, without making ex cathedra statements, as head of the ordinary magisterium. Ordinatio Sacerdotalis is a good example of a definitive papal pronouncement that confirms or reaffirms a teaching of the ordinary and universal Magisterium.

The Pope and Infallibility

 

[royal priest]

Is the Papal "Pull" Infallible?

She's just lucky Frankie didn't fashion a scourge and overturn the barriers

 

[Deus Vult!]

Yeah, I was being sarcastic.

I don't blame the old guy for slapping her hand but he apologized, he's the pope, Catholics should follow his example and allow woman to pull old people around.

I enjoyed your comment actually.
Do not swat at the gnat and swallow the camel though.
To worry about this issue with regard to the woman pulling his arm is the least of the Churches concern.
Christians are not obliged to follow the Bishop of Rome when he is in deep error almost constantly every time he opens his mouth.

 

[JM]

I enjoyed your comment actually.
Do not swat at the gnat and swallow the camel though.
To worry about this issue with regard to the woman pulling his arm is the least of the Churches concern.
Christians are not obliged to follow the Bishop of Rome when he is in deep error almost constantly every time he opens his mouth.

How do you know when he is in error? Do you have to wait for another pope to tell you the previous pope made a mistake? Maybe you are displaying "rigidity"?

Pope denounces 'rigidity' as he warns of Christian decline

 

[Deus Vult!]

How do you know when he is in error? Do you have to wait for another pope to tell you the previous pope made a mistake? Maybe you are displaying "rigidity"?

Pope denounces 'rigidity' as he warns of Christian decline

So it would be in the opposite direction, looking to what takes precedence. This is the way the Church has always functioned, when it comes to some Biblical passage or interpretation thereof we look to history. When we are checking to see if some comment made by the pope is congruent with the Faith we look to history. Always to history. So we are not waiting for a future Pope but looking to those that preceded him. And those that preceded him are in unanimous agreement that this pope ought to be held by the faithful as heretical.

 

[JM]

So during the Western Schism (1378-1417) how was it possible for the average Catholic to know which Pope was the one, true Pope?

 

[nonaeroterraqueous]

Do not swat at the gnat and swallow the camel though.

Are you calling the Pope a camel?

 

[Deus Vult!]

So during the Western Schism (1378-1417) how was it possible for the average Catholic to know which Pope was the one, true Pope?

I dont know what your are supposing or asking ??

 

[Deus Vult!]

Are you calling the Pope a camel?

I am calling Francis heretical. Mainly because he affirms Protestant errors.

 

[JM]

I dont know what your are supposing or asking ??

One must be subject to the Pope of Rome. How can you be subject to a heretic and not become one?

In other words, if you lay down with dogs you get up with fleas.

Yours,

jm

 

[tampasteve]

MOD HAT ON

This thread is closed for review.

MOD HAT OFF

 

[Joy]

MOD HAT ON​

After Staff Review

Thread is Now
Permanently Closed
RV: Flaming and Goading

MOD HAT OFF​