- May 29, 2022
- 58
- 11
- 39
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Divorced
It's a common misconception perpetuated by the left and the mainstream media that overturning Roe would lead to an automatic, national ban on abortion. What would really happen is that individual states would have the right to form their own abortion laws, as they did before the Roe decision.
Pro-life Adventists who support the overturning of Roe are not, whether wittingly or unwittingly, hastening the national Sunday law. In fact, Adventist pioneers supported laws against abortion in their own time:
It should also not be forgotten that Ellen White encouraged Adventists to work with Sunday keepers as part of the temperance movement:
Ellen White went so far as to say that Adventists should vote on the Sabbath day.
If there is a cause consistent with the values of Adventism, such as the right to life, Adventists should work with Sunday keepers to further that cause, and see it as an opportunity to introduce Sunday keepers to the Adventist faith.
Pro-life Adventists who support the overturning of Roe are not, whether wittingly or unwittingly, hastening the national Sunday law. In fact, Adventist pioneers supported laws against abortion in their own time:
EARLY ABORTION VIEWS
The June 25, 1867, Advent Review and Sabbath Herald contained what apparently was the first statement on abortion to appear in Adventist literature. In an article titled "Fashionable Murder," the author, John Todd, praised the work of the Physicians' Crusade—a late nineteenth-century movement against abortion, which had been widely practiced in America during the early part of that century.
Speaking of abortion, Todd declared, "The willful killing of a human being at any stage of its existence is murder."4
The abortion question was again addressed in the November 30, 1869, issue of the Advent Review and Sabbath Herald. Under the title "A Few Words Concerning a Great Sin" the Review said, "One of the most shocking and yet one of the most prevalent sins of this generation is the murder of unborn infants. Let those who think this a small sin read Psalm 139:16. They will see that even the unborn child is written in God's book. And they may be well assured that God will not pass unnoticed the murder of such children." 5
A Solemn Appeal contained the Adventist press's next reference to abortion. James White edited this book in 1870, while he was president of the General Conference. White excerpted a statement from Dr. E. P. Miller's Exhausted Vitality for inclusion in the book. The quotation he used reflects the strong sentiments of those physicians involved in the crusade against abortion. Miller castigated abortion as a "nefarious business," a "worse than devilish practice," and a "terrible sin." He went on to say, "Many a woman deter mines that she will not become a mother, and subjects herself to the vilest treatment, committing the basest crime to carry out her purpose. And many a man, who has 'as many children as he can support,' instead of restraining his passions, aids in the destruction of the babes he has begotten.
"The sin lies at the door of both parents in equal measure." 6
KELLOGG SPEAKS OUT
What about the "right arm" of the church, the medical work? In his book Man, the Masterpiece, published in 1894, Dr. John Harvey Kellogg argued against the idea that abortion was permissible before quickening. "From the very moment of conception, those processes have been in operation which result in the production of a fully developed human being from a mere jelly drop, a minute cell. As soon as this development begins, a new human being has come into existence—in embryo, it is true, but possessed of its own individuality, with its own future. . . . From this moment, it acquires the right to life, a right so sacred that in every land to violate it is to incur the penalty of death. . . . None but God knows the full extent of this most heinous crime." 7
The statements quoted above verify the little-known fact that historic Adventism was not silent regarding the abortion question. While the church did not directly involve itself in the 40-year battle to legislate anti-abortion statutes in the United States, the evidence shows where these Adventist leaders stood on the issues that crusade raised.
Ellen G. White did not directly ad dress the issue of abortion, but she did make a number of strong statements regarding the sanctity of human life. For example, she wrote: "Life is mysterious and sacred. It is the manifestation of God Himself, the source of all life. . . .
"God looks into the tiny seed that He Himself has formed, and sees wrapped within it the beautiful flower, the shrub, or the lofty, wide-spreading tree. So does He see the possibilities in every human being." 8
And in another place she spoke even more directly to the point of protecting innocent human life when she wrote, "Human life, which God alone could give, must be sacredly guarded."9
So our Adventist heritage includes both statements that explicitly espouse the sanctity of human life and statements that explicitly condemn abortion. Nineteenth-century Adventism stood in harmony with the previous 18 centuries of Christian thought.
By the 1890s the influence of the Physicians' Crusade had led to the legislation of anti-abortion laws in the United States. This resulted in a cooling of public debate over abortion and began what has been called the "century of silence" on the abortion question. 10 In reality, the "silence" lasted for approximately 70 years. Christian thinking on abortion remained consistent during this period.
Abortion: history of Adventist guidelines
It should also not be forgotten that Ellen White encouraged Adventists to work with Sunday keepers as part of the temperance movement:
The introduction of health and temperance literature in connection with denominational works, may be the means of your reaching a class of people who would be much opposed to you, if it wore not for your temperance principles. Whenever you can got an opportunity to unite with the temperance people, do so. ' But,' you say, ' we are not of their faith.' Did Jesus say so when he was invited to great festivals? ,Did he say, 'They do not believe on we, and It is of no use for me to go there' he went just for the purpose of bringing himself to their notice, and to lead them to believe from his conversation and deportment that he was of God. These things should have a telling influence upon us. People believe everything they ought not to of us. How are we going to undeceive them unless by associating with them? You say they are going to carry this question right along with the Sunday movement. How are you going to help them on that point? You have an opportunity to show them that you are the most earnest temperance people in the world ; and yet you are not improving the opportunity offered you in regard to the temperance question. How are you going to let your light shine to the world without uniting with them in this temperance question? You can do it. You have ideas they never thought of, and this places you on vantage ground. If you engage with them in this work, you will find there will be an opportunity to speak of the truth. We can do no better work than to interest ourselves in helping others to a knowledge of the principles of temperance reform. When you do that, you are blessing them, and their hearts will be open to receive the truth.
https://documents.adventistarchives.org/Periodicals/RH/RH18880214-V65-07.pdf
Ellen White went so far as to say that Adventists should vote on the Sabbath day.
'Yes, to a man, everywhere,' she replied, 'and perhaps I shall shock some of you if I say, If necessary, vote on the Sabbath day for prohibition if you cannot at any other time."'
EllenWhite.Org Website - Voting for a Political Candidate or for an Issue on Sabbath
If there is a cause consistent with the values of Adventism, such as the right to life, Adventists should work with Sunday keepers to further that cause, and see it as an opportunity to introduce Sunday keepers to the Adventist faith.