• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Other Birth Control Options?

redflag1980

Member
Oct 20, 2004
20
1
45
Virginia
✟22,646.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Engaged
:wave: Well I think I agree with the others in saying that NFP does not work...I believe maybe for some of the couples it does but not for most....I think what my fiance and I are going to do is to try birth control for the first few months then go on to try other options but most books say you have to know your body like for a year....I did not even know we should start planning this type of stuff until we were 7 months to the wedding...

I applaud the people who do NFP...but it is not for me....

Trying to get advice,
Allison....
 
Upvote 0

katelyn

Senior Veteran
Oct 6, 2003
2,309
105
43
✟25,445.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
redflag1980 said:
:wave: Well I think I agree with the others in saying that NFP does not work...I believe maybe for some of the couples it does but not for most....
You may "think" it does not work, but studies show that it's almost as effective as the Pill. Now, if you don't feel comfortable using it as a birth control method, that's totally up to you and I respect that choice. But I don't understand why people think that it doesn't work. The only thing I hear as an argument for it not working is "I know someone who got pregnant while using NFP." Well, I know plenty of people who've gotten pregnant while using hormonal birth control, but I know that doesn't mean that the Pill "doesn't work." The fact is that first of all you have to be using the method correctly, and secondly, even if you are using the method correctly, no method is 100% effective.
 
Upvote 0

Oblivious

Matthew 7:12
Nov 6, 2003
12,602
615
The Mile High City
✟46,244.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
katelyn said:
You may "think" it does not work, but studies show that it's almost as effective as the Pill.
I did a little research and I was shocked at the failure rate of NFP - around 25%.

http://kidshealth.org/teen/sexual_health/contraception/bc_chart.html
http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/1997/conceptbl.html
http://www.peacehealth.org/kbase/frame/tw941/tw9416/frame.htm

That's great that this method has worked "so far" for many of you. But I don't like a calendar dictating to me when I can be intimate with my husband, and on top of that the failure rate is way too high for me to even consider it.

no method is 100% effective.
I agree.
 
Upvote 0

katelyn

Senior Veteran
Oct 6, 2003
2,309
105
43
✟25,445.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Oblivious said:
Well, that does depend on what source you look at, and frankly common sense would tell you not to be surprised that the failure rate for people who aren't using it right would be higher than the failure rate for people not using the Pill right. What I mean is, missing the Pill one day would fall in the category of not using it right, which means a woman "might" possibly ovulate, although the chances are still low. Since NFP/FAM do not prevent ovulation, using the method wrong means you are more likely to have sex while you are ovulating, which of course makes the failure rate higher.

So, you could say that's a downside to NFP...that if you use it wrong it's more likely to cause pregnancy than if you use miss your Pill once or twice. But, if not conceiving is that big of a deal to you, then you should use whatever your birth control method is responsibly, and you won't have to worry about those "worst case" failure rates.

That's great that this method has worked "so far" for many of you.
And it's great that the Pill has worked "so far" for many of you. :p

But I don't like a calendar dictating to me when I can be intimate with my husband, and on top of that the failure rate is way too high for me to even consider it.
I addressed the failure rate above, but as far as the calendar thing goes, that's personal preference, although my husband and I used FAM, which says it's okay to use a barrier method during your fertile phase.

Every method of birth control has its ups and downs, and like I said, choosing is a personal decision. But my husband and I are satisfied with our decision because hormonal birth control had many side effects on me that basically made me miserable. Not only that, but the whole time we were on the Pill I felt a little uneasy about the controversy about whether hormonal birth control works as an abortifacient. Although no research that I've seen has convinced me "for sure" that it is, just the fact that it might very well be was bothering my conscience. There were just many things in our situation that made us so much happier using FAM.

Edited to add: I'm not trying to be argumentative here or act like NFP/FAM is "best" or "right for everyone." My point is just that these methods aren't as bad as many people think, and that there are good and bad things about every birth control method.
 
Upvote 0

PurpleBunny

Rabid Purple Bunny of the Apocalypse
Sep 20, 2004
1,135
32
45
Visit site
✟1,470.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
redflag1980 said:
To anyone,

Do you think that birth control pills are abortifacts?

and do you think that Genesis 38 is a good method to use(withdrawl)?

Just questions I am pondering...if any of you would like to answer that would be cool!:)

Thanks for everything,
Redflag!!!!
I haven't decided my opinion on birth control pills, though I'm leaning towards depo for when I get married if my doctor thinks it's a good choice for me.

As for withdrawal... considering that there can be viable sperm in pre-[bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse], I would say that the withdrawal method wouldn't work very well at all... in fact, I've heard that doctors & nurses have one word for people using that method of birth control -- "PARENTS"!
 
Upvote 0

Sascha Fitzpatrick

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2004
6,534
470
✟9,123.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm still waiting for finalised research on that one - some people have jumped on the bandwagon BEFORE the research has been confirmed and finalised.

Plus, the term abortifacient changes according to when you believe a 'life' happens. If it is when the sperm and the egg fuse, then a BCP (if the research is correct) would be an abortifacient, cos it sheds the uterine wall lining (therefore preventing implantation and the fertilised egg is lost). If you believe life begins at implantation, then if the research is proven correct, then you wouldn't agree it was an abortifacient.

Remember that the research is VERY new, as yet not finally tested, and this is the SECONDARY action of it. The PRIMARY one is to prevent ovulation, and an egg being released. If you know the sort of time you could ovulate (even if you're on the pill, sometimes you do ovulate if it fails - that's when the wall shedding feature is showing to occur), then you could just abstain for those couple of days, and could have no qualms using the BCP.

That's the kind of way I'm planning to use BCP - two weeks after my placebo pills end (and my period finishes), I'll abstain for about three days. I'm on the pill now, but not sexually active, so I'll just keep going after I'm married.

Sasch
 
Upvote 0

charligirl

Senior Veteran
Aug 26, 2003
2,139
11
55
London
✟32,471.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Sascha Fitzpatrick said:
Plus, the term abortifacient changes according to when you believe a 'life' happens. If it is when the sperm and the egg fuse, then a BCP (if the research is correct) would be an abortifacient, cos it sheds the uterine wall lining (therefore preventing implantation and the fertilised egg is lost). If you believe life begins at implantation, then if the research is proven correct, then you wouldn't agree it was an abortifacient.
*nodding* that is what my reserach has led me to as well. My feelings based on the above are that life begins at conception so indications show that it is an abortifacient. If you read the small print in the instructions my pill said that if I happened to ovulate, the egg would not implant as the pill kept the womb lining too thin...... which was enough for me to change my method of BC - added to which the hormones were doing me no good at all.
 
Upvote 0
I

InTheFlame

Guest
Sascha Fitzpatrick said:
That's the kind of way I'm planning to use BCP - two weeks after my placebo pills end (and my period finishes), I'll abstain for about three days. I'm on the pill now, but not sexually active, so I'll just keep going after I'm married.
:scratch: Either I'm confused, or you are (I'm willing to concede the former's pretty likely). A standard cycle is 'start of period' -> (14 days) -> ovulation -> (14 days) -> 'start of period' (isn't it?). Unless you have a 35-day cycle or a very short luteal phase, shouldn't you be abstaining a week after your period ends? Most people say, too, that when trying to conceive you should have sex from 2 days before ovulation, to 3 days after ovulation.
 
Upvote 0

Sascha Fitzpatrick

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2004
6,534
470
✟9,123.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
:p

KNEW that'd get everyone confused...

I've had such a weird cycle OFF the pill that I've had to go do my checkups to see when I'm actually fertile...

Yep, my cycle is (without the pill) 35 days usually - it sux big time... After discussing this with my doctor (whose now sent me to a gynecologist for further check ups due to other reproductive problems we've just discovered), this was the general 'plan' given to me...

:sigh: REALLY hating my reproductive capabilities at the moment...

Sasch
 
Upvote 0