Do you lose weight faster if you have had natural birth rather than c-section?
Well, I don't know now that you mention it, but you do lose weight faster if you breastfeed.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you lose weight faster if you have had natural birth rather than c-section?
Well, I don't know now that you mention it, but you do lose weight faster if you breastfeed.![]()
I lost more weight when I didn't nurse. Most moms I know say the same thing. I guess it all depends on the person but from the people I've spoken to regarding that - most say they lost more weight once they weened (4 months to almost 2 years range)...![]()
Well, either way, breastfeeding burns 500 calories a day. Of course I hope you are right that I have no trouble next time because after my last two experiences with breastfeeding I suspect I may not try with the third baby. None the less, 500 calories a day..... if you're not breastfeeding you have to decrease your intake.
That is so weird. I didn't have the urge to push at first with my daughter, and trying to once the midwife said go for it REALLY hurt! I had to push quite a bit and when they told me not to push it was really hard to stop, LOL!You know I must have had the strangest experience with pushing. I did not have the urge to push, and it didn't feel good. It didn't feel bad either, but the contractions were hitting me like a freight truck and I finally decided I could either sit there whining about it all evening (I was at 10 for a while before I came to this conclusion) or I could push the baby out-- so push I did. I did NOT feel the ring of fire although at one point she told me not to push and so I didn't (which I found not to be a problem because I had no urge) ..... I had enough of a tear to get one stitch, which is far better than my first birth's 4th degree tear. I noticed nothing about the pushing but the contractions continued to be overwhelming until the end..... and then some (after pains).
Umm... what's the ring of fire? It sounds dreadful....
First stage is best spent active. Do whatever you would normally do for the day, eg housework, don't go to the hospital until towards the end of the first stage.
i wish i could..but i have no choice. And yes..pitocin is awful..and yet again i must have it..sigh..now im freaking out after reading these past few posts..the memories of all the pain is coming back..and ill experience it all again in a week..an induction, pitocin...but maybe THIS time my epidural will work..we'll see...Induction is bad. Say no to induction!
Ina May's guide to childbirth is at the library waiting for me, and I've been reading The Bradley book. I have some concerns about natural childbirth due to some physical health and fitness issues. First, the position the Bradley book says to lie in for the first stage of labor is impossible for me. I have torn muscles in my chest, so I can't lie on my side and lean forward because it burns like mad. It also hurts to sit upright or to drive, but not as badlyI'm pretty much constantly clutching my chest these days.
For those of you who know about the labor stages and did natural childbirth, what positions did you use for the first stage?
I have Group B Strep and plan on taking antibiotics, so I was under the impression I need to go to the hospital relatively early?