Monophysitism is actually biblical. Nowhere does the Scriptures say or suggest that Jesus has a human nature or human soul or human spirit. Jesus was not tempted internally to do evil at any time. He was holy and undefiled and separate from sinners (See Hebrews 7:25). You can't be holy and separate from sinners if you have a corrupt human nature like a sinner (Who has lusts bubbling under the surface). Also, while Jesus had flesh and blood, he did not have human failings like we did. Jesus did not possess a human who was already in existence and nor did he possess a blank mindless soul that was inclined to sin.
In addition, some who deny Monophysitism make the claim that the atonement is denied if one denies the human nature of Christ. But nowhere will you find a verse to back up their claims (When they say this). Jesus did not need to have a human nature to pay the price for our sins. That is just silly. The Bible says Christ took on our sins within His body. For it is written, "Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed." (1 Peter 2:24). So no human nature is needed to take on our sins.
In fact, I believe it is heresy for Carm to claim that Jesus worshiped God the Father.
See this article here:
https://carm.org/does-jesus-have-a-god
The Bible says the Word was made flesh. It does not say the Word was made flesh and spirit.
Common objections that Jesus had a human nature is Hebrews 2:17. It says that He was made like unto his brethren. But most skip passed the word "like" in that sentence. In other words, Jesus was able to know what humans went through when they are tempted in a way while in the flesh, but in reality He was not actually internally tempted to do any kind of evil in any way because He was 100% God. God is holy and He cannot sin. Some will also say Hebrews 4:15 is proof that Jesus had a human nature. For it says he was tempted in all points like we are and yet he was without sin. How can he be without sin and yet be tempted in all points like a man? The only way He could not be tempted is if he was 100% God. So this is talking about how he was tempted in all points externally and not internally. For there is a difference between being tempted externally when you have no real interest in something vs. being tempted internally based on the fact that you have lusts that desire for something sinful to give your flesh pleasure. So folks are saying Jesus had lusts or desires. This means He was not spotless and undefiled. To just have lusts and desires like us means one is defiled. Jesus is one with the Father. The lust of the flesh is of the world and not of the Father. For it is written, "For all that
is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." (1 John 2:16). I mean, stop and think for a second. Does Jesus still have a human nature? Does He still struggle with sin as a part of being human?
Plerosis (Which is the opposite of the Kenosis) is the what I believe the Bible teaches:
Jesus was fully God; So this means He fully possessed His powers. However, Christ did suppress them during the Incarnation. For His Omniscience was obviously suppressed because the Scripture say He grew in wisdom and He grew in knowledge of the Scriptures (See Luke 2:52) (Isaiah 7:14-16). This makes sense because Jesus was fulfilling the type of Adam. Adam in the beginning was also limited in knowledge. This explains why Jesus appeared to speak as if he had a different will than the Father's will. Christ suppressing His ability of Omniscience would mean that He appeared to not know entirely the Father's will so as to seek out another alternative to save us. This does not mean he was speaking from some human flawed nature. It only means He was merely speaking from a limited set of knowledge that was suppressed during the Incarnation so as to be a type of Adam.
As for Semi-Pelaganism: Well, I would say that I believe in something similar called:
Synergism: Synergism and Semi-Pelagianism each teach there is some form of collaboration in salvation between God and man. I believe that is very Biblical. For we are saved by both God's grace and by works in the Sanctification process (if we surrender our lives to God). But I do not believe in Semi-Pelagianism entirely because I believe God draws all men to Himself as a part of us having faith in Him (John 12:32). For Semi-Pelagianism falsely teaches that the human will is the first half of our coming to the faith. But in reality it is God who draws us (of which we cannot come to God without this drawing). However, I believe we must effectively respond to His drawing of our own free will. God does not force us to be saved. We still have free will to accept or reject the Lord Jesus in this life. Otherwise the Judgment would be a joke or farce. For even Jesus desired for those in Jerusalem to be gathered to Him, but they would not allow Jesus to do so (See Matthew 23:27).
As for Carm: Well, I do not believe in any of the classic points in Calvinism. I see them as all major problems that attempts to smear the good moral character of the Lord our God (No offense of course).
The baptism of Jesus always did it for me too. 
