QuakerOats
— ♥ — Living in Love — ♥ —
I know this is an old post, but I've been thinking a bit about this for some time. I'm not exactly sure what is meant by 'which says a lot to me,' but I'm going to admit to being one of those Quakers. A poster mentioned earlier that many Quakers generally feel that formal creeds limit God. I think this was definitely an aspect of early Quaker thought, and one that I seek to 'preserve' as best I can. Founder George Fox essentially came from a world in which Christian thought permeated just about every aspect of life, and so I feel like it only made sense that his own path reflected, and was understood in the same way, if you will. I do not pretend to know Fox, but my point is that, although the RSOF was founded as a Christian denomination, in my opinion, its methods and practice reach far beyond the 'Christian' name, leaving it wanting. At least that's how I feel, and why I can comfortably call myself a Quaker, but not a Christian.there are some Quakers that will say they would rather be called Quakers then christians. which says a lot to me.
Upvote
0