Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is, at best, a side-issue.
Clutch your pearls all you want.
This doesn’t rise to the level that the elder Biden need do anything.
We have no way to know if there is an ongoing investigation because of FBI policy.
And while we know the FBI had involved the laptop, likely in a money laundering scheme, we don't know who that involved.
The justice system was not set up to make election decisions. And it can take quite a while.
The issue to me is that now two people claiming to be business partners indicate problematic dealing, involving Joe Biden, or at least his name.
Joe's team has been reluctant to say they are not Hunter's emails.
The documents turned over to the committee may shed more light. But I am not sure it will matter much in the long run to the election. With a good amount of early voting most minds are already made up.
What it may, unfortunately mean, is ongoing investigations under a Biden or Trump administration.
Emails, people saying they are valid, matching up dates to know records etc. is presenting evidence that people have to make a decision about.
It might help if Joe said that the emails were not legitimate.
The drip, drip of this is obviously intentional.
Put out a report with little evidence, then get news coverage by it being downplayed due to little evidence. Then slowly drip out more evidence over time. You get multiple narratives in one, the media is bad, people disregard crimes by one party, etc. and then catch them in misrepresentations based on the initial flimsy data.
That may also be partly why the Biden campaign is not responding.
It could also be one drip because it's a nothingburger. And given the incredibly dicey circumstances in which this information was apparently obtained, and given that this is basically BUT HER EMAILS v2.0 - there is not really much to respond to here. Without some very solid verification, which currently hasn't been done, there is nothing to be gained from responding to what looks like obvious misinformation.
Don't worry, I'm sure Rudy Giuliani is on it right now. I just saw a picture of him in an interview with a female reporter and it looked like he was fishing some hard verification out of his pants.
Yes, a subpoena was issued by the grand jury and the FBI served it -- so the FBI turned the laptop over to the federal prosecutor who called the Grand Jury. Presumably, the prosecutor disclosed the information contained in the laptop to the Grand Jury looking for an indictment. My question is, where are those indictments? Indictments (charges against a person) are not secret -- if they have an indictment then they are allegedly ready to take the case to court.
Of course, it is now 10 months later, since the grand jury subpoenaed the laptop, so it seems odd that there have been no indictments. Granted, there are other reasons why the FBI might still be investigating. It just seems odd, since the Grand Jury subpoenaed the laptop, that they have not indicted anyone (and indictments would be public as the FBI would be looking to make arrests).
Except how would Joe know, as he was not someone copied on the emails? It seems like Joe has denied what he can so far, based on what it is alleged he may have done.
And, as I've mentioned in another post, the best way to create a disinformation campaign is to mix things in that are true. So, for example, say that Hunter's emails had been hacked; the hackers could easily then add in a couple of fake emails and, better yet, add a couple of lines into innocuous emails that now make them look corrupt. At that point -- particularly when there are thousands of emails -- they initially look like they are legitimate, preventing the target (or recipient of a given email) from outright saying they are fakes.
Except how would Joe know, as he was not someone copied on the emails? It seems like Joe has denied what he can so far, based on what it is alleged he may have done.
An empty shell company from DE that has never been used.
An email domain (nazent.com) that doesn't exist.
A person (Tony Bobulinksi) who's only net presence apart from this thing is a court case
An Affadavit in which Tony spends the entire 3rd paragraph letting people know what his relatives do for a living, in which he swears to the precise contents of an email he received years ago.
An email found on a laptop (I dare anyone here to go onto their laptop hard drive (not their email client) and find a 2 year old email).
Someone who, we are finding out for the very first time, calls his father "the big guy" and "my chairman".
This whole thing is a crock of half baked nonsense being drip fed 2 weeks before the election because Emails! Investigation! worked for your unimaginator-in-chief 4 years ago so he reckons it will work for him now.
That “if” is carrying a lot of weight there.
Of course. Just like "if" Trump paid off an adult star, when it looked like he did. And then we found out he did.
Your solution appears to be to ignore the possibility. But the more people coming forward the harder it is to ignore.
It could also be one drip because it's a nothingburger. And given the incredibly dicey circumstances in which this information was apparently obtained, and given that this is basically BUT HER EMAILS v2.0 - there is not really much to respond to here. Without some very solid verification, which currently hasn't been done, there is nothing to be gained from responding to what looks like obvious misinformation.
It would be a lot more impactful if Joe said the emails were not legitimate.
So far the information is matching up with what is known
So please be clear what you are claiming. Is this Tony guy non-existent? Or is he just lying?
Are the photos of Hunter fabricated?
Is the former associate of Hunter who is in jail and claiming he is a fall guy for Hunter real?
Yeah, I am pretty sure it is not that hard to say they are not real emails if they are not real emails.
If someone made fake emails and claimed I was doing these things, I would sure say it was not true. They still have the burden of proof in the end. But this is about perception.
Boy you sure are making a compelling case not to vote for Hunter Biden for President
Such massive importance
I already voted for Biden/Harris so this all is so much fluff for me.Of course. Just like "if" Trump paid off an adult star, when it looked like he did. And then we found out he did.
Your solution appears to be to ignore the possibility. But the more people coming forward the harder it is to ignore.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?