When not looking at the natural process of a rock, or the rest of the earth for that matter, that's rejecting the natural process.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
When not looking at the natural process of a rock, or the rest of the earth for that matter, that's rejecting the natural process.What are you dreaming about now? Why would I reject the natural? It is where we live and one would have to be crazy to try and reject it. What you need to be careful about is giving just the natural credit for our very existence.
Changing the idea that the natural world leads us to know about where it all came from. The natural world study only leads us to learn about how it works.A study of the natural world can repent? What are you going on about?
I am not sure I referred to your misdating as embedded age. You do however imbed imaginary ages in rocks, so maybe that term can workYou're the one who says that embedded age is a thing, not me, so I'm free of it anyway.
Not true. I can look at radioactive decay without making a god that created the universe out of itWhen not looking at the natural process of a rock, or the rest of the earth for that matter, that's rejecting the natural process.
Changing the idea that the natural world leads us to know about where it all came from. The natural world study only leads us to learn about how it works.
I am not sure I referred to your misdating as embedded age. You do however imbed imaginary ages in rocks, so maybe that term can work
What about the geological history of the rest of the Earth that shows it many billions of years old? You have clearly rejected the natural evolutionary process of the earth. I live in the Pacific Northwest where we have the Cascade Mountains. The geological history of it's build up that goes back 45 million years. Are you now saying that you accept that history. Or there's the Yellowstone Hot Spot, remember you laughing at it's history? The Yellowstone Hot Spot has played a part of the geology of the Pacific Northwest for 60 million years. Is that something your accepting now?Not true. I can look at radioactive decay without making a god that created the universe out of it
All the verifiable , geological, etc, history of the earth is
exactly as YHVH reveals in Scripture.
Choose today who to believe, YHVH the Creator, or false gods / men.
As we've gone over already, you have no idea how geochemistry science works or to the extent of it's usage and knowledge of what it can show us.You do however imbed imaginary ages in rocks, so maybe that term can work
That's not at all true.All the verifiable , geological, etc, history of the earth is
exactly as YHVH reveals in Scripture.
Choose today who to believe, YHVH the Creator, or false gods / men.
"YHVH the Creator: The biblical narrative consistently portrays YHVH as the one and only true God, Creator of the universe, and the God of Israel. The prophets and biblical authors repeatedly emphasize YHVH’s uniqueness, monotheistic nature, and exclusive claim to worship (e.g., Isaiah 44:6, 45:5-7; Exodus 20:3-5).
False Gods: The search results also highlight the existence of false gods and idols worshipped by ancient nations, including Baal, Molech, Ashtoreth, and others (e.g., 1 Kings 18:18-40; Jeremiah 2:8). These deities were often associated with polytheistic religions and were rejected by the Israelites as false and idolatrous.
Conclusion: In light of the biblical testimony and historical records, it is reasonable to conclude that YHVH the Creator is the one true God, and false gods are mere creations of human imagination or idolatrous constructs. The choice between believing in YHVH and false gods is clear: YHVH is the only God worthy of worship and devotion."
You are evidently on the same mission as AV1611 and truthpls. The first statement of the Nicene Creed, the basic statement of faith for all Christians, reads "I believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible." Your sole purpose has been to make that statement conditional on acceptance of a literal and inerrant Genesis and give the lie to anyone who professes it without that condition.All the verifiable , geological, etc, history of the earth is
exactly as YHVH reveals in Scripture.
Choose today who to believe, YHVH the Creator, or false gods / men.
be careful what you listen to; most is wrong and misleading.
It is not a problem for me to look at the natural. The only problem is when you look at nothing elseAnd that's only a problem for you and you alone. So no, science has no need to 'repent' just because of one offended Canadian Young Earth Creationist.
But what that means is another story. In context here it means the age you embed in your head instead of reality and what we had from creation..... THIS THREAD IS TALKING ABOUT EMBEDDED AGE!! IT'S IN THE TITLE!
The example of the rock was already looked at. What else have you got?What about the geological history of the rest of the Earth that shows it many billions of years old?
No, there are processes going on in the earth. We reject those as being the creatorYou have clearly rejected the natural evolutionary process of the earth.
Just like the rock goes back billions of years. We get it. The fantasy dates loom large in your headI live in the Pacific Northwest where we have the Cascade Mountains. The geological history of it's build up that goes back 45 million years.
Yes and that started with AdamAre you now saying that you accept that history.
Why would I accept dates 60 million years older than the universe existed? I accept them for what they are. A misguided belief that the natural world is basically the creator of heaven and earth and a belief that what is in a rock was what was responsible for all that is in the rock. Circular reasoning at bestOr there's the Yellowstone Hot Spot, remember you laughing at it's history? The Yellowstone Hot Spot has played a part of the geology of the Pacific Northwest for 60 million years. Is that something your accepting now?
Sorry you missed it. Here is the deal. Geochemistry is not the creator any more than the radioactive decay process was. Anything else?As we've gone over already, you have no idea how geochemistry science works or to the extent of it's usage and knowledge of what it can show us.
What "mission" are you talking about? Have you been spying on our secret society's meetings?You are evidently on the same mission as AV1611 and truthpls.
It's not a secret. Biblical creationists are quite up front about it. If you claim to believe in God as creator of all things but not a literal Genesis you are lying.What "mission" are you talking about? Have you been spying on our secret society's meetings?
If you claim to believe in God as creator of all things but not a literal Genesis you are lying.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?