- Oct 16, 2023
- 2,615
- 557
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
This is not the first post I see you use 'woo woo' Define the word
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is not the first post I see you use 'woo woo' Define the wordThere's what the Earth is actually showing us about itSelf and than there's woo-woo. Embedded age is woo-woo.
The rock was how it was meant to be. Your failure to be able to tell us why (and assigning only natural reasons for it's existence) does not make it look billions of years old to us at all. If someone ate a horribly large amount of magic mushrooms, and sat there looking at a dog, it might look like the dog is talking to them, and wearing a dress and has a two foot tongue.
Try not to blame the dog for the stoned person's visions.
According to the gemological A&E, "they"did not need to be the very first humans to existWhat's the difference?
Science can't show. One way or the other. Yet it explains all things the other way.Except that you can't show such an event taking place.
Until you take your head out of the sand, then all there is would be the sandExcept that I've repeatedly said that science can't study the supernatural. You're the one who's acting like it can.
Until you show the supernatural did it, then all there is is the natural.
Science can't show. One way or the other. Yet it explains all things the other way.
Until you take your head out of the sand, then all there is would be the sand
Saying that the rock had to come to exist only by natural means is the deception.Saying 'the rock was how it was meant to be' is doing nothing more than once again asserting and supporting the idea that God is deceptive.
I explained how man does not know how God creates. Nor how He separates water and land on a planet. Nor how He affects nature when He curses mankind.It's also an absolutely massive non-answer from you as well.
Saying that the rock had to come to exist only by natural means is the deception.
I explained how man does not know how God creates. Nor how He separates water and land on a planet. Nor how He affects nature when He curses mankind.
Looking at nothing but natural processes in a created rock to explain where it came from or how long ago is deception. No need to blame others.
You need to use something else to study it than the natural only. What you got?Then give us evidence of the supernatural to study then.
Yes, Jesus, who you anly care about if He can help you prove the literal inerrancy of Genesis. Do you really think that's the only reason He came to Earth, died on the cross and rose again? That's certainly the "Gospel" you are preaching here.There was something there actually. - Jesus
You need to use something else to study it than the natural only. What you got?
Yes I can. If God created it all a day before by SUPERNATURAL creation, then claiming it was made only y the natural is deception. Here is the math.You can't show that is is deception.
There was no age in the 1 day old rock. You just embedded it by mistakenly attributing existence to the natural onlyWhile embedded age certainly is nothing but deception.
The context was what was around after the old testament. Jesus was around. He talked of creation. He sent words to friends from heaven and they also talked about creation - first hand!Yes, Jesus, who you anly care about if He can help you prove the literal inerrancy of Genesis. Do you really think that's the only reason He came to Earth, died on the cross and rose again? That's certainly the "Gospel" you are preaching here.
Yes, I will tell you then. Yes, that is all you got!You tell me. It's your idea.
Yes I can. If God created it all a day before by SUPERNATURAL creation, then claiming it was made only y the natural is deception. Here is the math.
[where God's creation is S for supernatural and the natural processes in the rock are N]
S ≠ N
There was no age in the 1 day old rock. You just embedded it by mistakenly attributing existence to the natural only
Work on that math equation. In it lies wisdom
Yes, I will tell you then. Yes, that is all you got!
Yes and very meaningful! Too bad science use just the N to tell us where it all came fromThat's not an equation in any meaningful sense of the word at all and you know it.
It is a thing in the mind of that scientist looking at that rock the day after it was created by God. The poor guy is convinced that that rock is billions of years old. And for the same reasons you think it is now!So, once again, you cannot show embedded age is a thing,
Adam was not deceived. So you think the rock had stuff in it solely to blow the scientist's mind? If the scientist was smart he would have known betterand thus I will continue to call embedded age a deception until you or anyone else shows me otherwise. But I'm not holding my breath.
No I claimed nothing of the sort. It can't.Are we just spouting gibberish now? You're definitely loosing it, so let's back track a bit.
You claimed that science can study the supernatural.
Remember the math.I asked you how. Your example of how science can study the supernatural is...?
Yes and very meaningful! Too bad science use just the N to tell us where it all came from
It is a thing in the mind of that scientist looking at that rock the day after it was created by God. The poor guy is convinced that that rock is billions of years old. And for the same reasons you think it is now!
Adam was not deceived. So you think the rock had stuff in it solely to blow the scientist's mind? If the scientist was smart he would have known better
No I claimed nothing of the sort. It can't.
Remember the math.
S ≠ N
According to the gemological A&E, "they"did not need to be the very first humans to exist
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?