Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So you posted some junk from a few years back to imply that they're not safe around transsexual people either.Read his last post. Children are not safe around ministers according to him.
I don't have any problems with what they wear, but other posts certainly expressed concern.That's kinda hitting below the zone, no?
That what page 10 literally said, but we are getting off topic. I just copied and pasted it from the article you posted. That's all. I'm not making anything up.75% were 13 and under. That specifically contradicts everything you've said about the ages of the victims. I refuse to allow a conversation to continue when you are making up claims.
They are no longer active in ministry, or like most of them, are dead.Well, I guess you can't defrock a priest because he's...old?
- Since 2004, the Vatican received 3,400 credible cases of abuse.
- In total, 848 priests were defrocked, and 2,572 were sanctioned. The Vatican explained that the lesser punishments were often the end result of abuse investigations going back decades, mainly because the abusive priests were elderly or infirm.
A cassock is not a dress.Seems like a weird statement in a thread partially about Eastern Orthodox views of various political subjects, given what their priests wear.
They're dead.Why? You think it's not working? I mean, all those priests who were found to have assaulted children didn't resign the priesthood. Most of people them are still priests. Oh, except you think they're not.
Here, explain that to the Vatican: info@vaticanrome.it
Mainly because they were old or infirm it said. Not dead. Not defrocked. Just put out to pasture. For raping children.They are no longer active in ministry, or like most of them, are dead.
put out to pasture?Mainly because they were old or infirm it said. Not dead. Not defrocked. Just put out to pasture. For raping children.
I said a man wearing a dress who wants to be around children should be a red flag. I also posted some red flags to look for in ministers.So you posted some junk from a few years back to imply that they're not safe around transsexual people either.
Really?
What do you mean by 'normal' and how do you know what it is? Do you mean customary? 'Normal' implies that there is a normative standard. Who imposes that standard?I said a man wearing a dress who wants to be around children should be a red flag. I also posted some red flags to look for in ministers.
As much as I support their right to do whatever they choose, it is not normal for a man to want to dress as a woman, and it’s not normal for a man to want to be a woman.
I don’t want to stop them, mistreat them, discriminate against them or disrespect them but I’m not going to pretend that it’s normal.
You can, and the left is working overtime to make it normal, particularly teaching it to children.
You can call me names and criticize me but every fetish and persuasion is not necessarily normal and I’m not going to pretend that they are.
Please continue to post indicating that people that have traditional values are dangerous to children and that children are safer with people who have unusual sexual fetishes
So you posted something about a transsexual who assaulted a young girl? Implying that all transsexuals are somehow more likely to be rapists? Got to watch these people!I said a man wearing a dress who wants to be around children should be a red flag.
Thanks for posting this. Things have gotten so out of whack that you don’t know what normal meansWhat do you mean by 'normal' and how do you know what it is? Do you mean customary? 'Normal' implies that there is a normative standard. Who imposes that standard?
Should I do the same for all ministers?So you posted something about a transsexual who assaulted a young girl? Implying that all transsexuals are somehow more likely to be rapists? Got to watch these people!
My nephew is transsexual. He's a teacher. Do you want me to warn the school? Make sure he's never alone with children? What do you think?
Oh. I really don't know what it meant, to be honest.They were allowed to still be priests. And what do you really think the term means in this context?
You're the one posting an example of some low life as a warning. It's your call. But if the answer is yes then we'd have to group all racists by job description. Think that might work? Or maybe we look at the numbers.Should I do the same for all ministers?
No, you speak of 'normal' as if there was some objective standard. Is that what you meant?Thanks for posting this. Things have gotten so out of whack that you don’t know what normal means
Clever quip but I'm sure you're familiar with male and female doesn't exist, men can become pregnant, women can impregnate, sex, sexual orientation, gender is all fluid and one is whatever one identifies as ie a total break from reality.Didn't know transvestites were required to be ideological. Is there an instruction manual or something?
I guess that means you don't read or hear any news stories about it.If you never encountered it, and I never encountered it, what makes you think it's real?
(People get in trouble for not calling people what they want to be called)
I was raised to see that as just good manners.
There's supposed to be 78 gender pronouns. How is anyone supposed to keep track of all of them or know which ones to use in a first time encounter with a stranger?Why not just give everyone the same respect? How does it oppress you if someone wants a different pronoun than you think they should have?
It's not about me, it's about society at large. Especially the youth of society.You should go to a blackboard and write "it's not all about me" 100 times.
It's not about the abolishment of slurs. It's about the abolishment of many words like "mother" and the establishment of terms like "birthing person" in place of "mother". It's about a massive reengineering of vocabulary and the mandatory acceptance of Trans/LGBQQIP2SAA+ ideology taught to children as soon as they enter the school system.It started when they couldn't use the "N" word any more. Where will it end? If everyone who respects others has to be respected, what will happen to society?
Nothing bad, I think.
Nope they supported it IF they voted for it. If you do t support something you don't vote for it.No, they didn't support SSM, they allowed it. Most of them don't approve of it, but I guess they couldn't find the Bible verse that forbids them to allow a secular government to do something they disapprove of for solely religious reasons. Neither can you, apparently.
You don't know that since we can't say if a person is transgender or not. We are told we have no idea if a person is trans or not.Like all safety issues, it's a matter of probabilities. The evidence we have, indicates that ministers are more likely to be pedophiles than transgendered people.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?