- Jan 27, 2009
- 5,881
- 8,325
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Where and when to ‘reprove’.
There is strong reasoning to both sides of the permissiveness of this presence, wherever it is found speaking up for wrongdoing and open faults, usually brought to the flock’s attention by the ‘watchers on the wall’. Not at all hard to perceive,
Is it the mark of a hireling to avoid the negative report, or, a distraction from the contentious watchman?
Or, should the initial be the presiding alarm,
Is the best edification towards the Church achieved in a case-by-case or by the letter?
There is strong reasoning to both sides of the permissiveness of this presence, wherever it is found speaking up for wrongdoing and open faults, usually brought to the flock’s attention by the ‘watchers on the wall’. Not at all hard to perceive,
Is it the mark of a hireling to avoid the negative report, or, a distraction from the contentious watchman?
And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.
Or, should the initial be the presiding alarm,
If your brother or sister sins, go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over.
Is the best edification towards the Church achieved in a case-by-case or by the letter?