• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Obamagate Timeline...Explains A Lot

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
What do you mean? All of the information in the timeline came from published leftwing newspapers like the NYT.


Nope, its the usual lying, twisting and halftruths thats (regrettably) the modus operandi of the Trump cheerleaders.

I dont really get it, Im not opposed to different views and values, but why lie and misrepresent? Makes rational debate impossible.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,220
17,040
Here
✟1,468,922.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
He doesn't need to.

Sure he does...extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

We need more than a solitary news headline in order to validate a story.

He called them "Fake News" on more than one occasion...so given that, are we to assume that Trump's an idiot for blindly accepting information from a source that he, himself, accused of being fake?

Or, is it that news outlets are only "Fake News" when they're saying something bad about him?

Either way you slice it, he's on the hook for providing evidence. Either NYT is not fake news and he's been lying about several other things...or the NYT is fake news and he was an idiot to believe that information.

Which is it? --he can't have it both ways, either the media is reliable or it's not, he doesn't get to cherry pick based on what soothes his ego.
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
29,536
13,188
78
✟438,149.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
We already know that the wiretap happened. The question is who authorized it without a warrant?

So far, we don't know, but even the unnamed source that says that there was, says a judge granted a warrant.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Yep, he could settle this real quick. I wonder why he doesn't?
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
26,154
28,839
LA
✟637,446.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Yep, he could settle this real quick. I wonder why he doesn't?
He has no need to. Just floating the idea is enough for anyone who wants to believe the absolute worst of Obama. Just like he never had to prove Obama was not American. It's just not necessary to prove your lies if enough people automatically believe them.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

This is the risk he runs though. Now, he is constantly in the spotlight and if he keeps spewing garbage that can not be supported with evidence, people will grow tired of the sheer repetition of it and he will lose some of those people, who now believe everything he says.
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,085
21,152
✟1,749,492.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't understand your question. Perhaps you're using the wrong words. Do you mean release information or stop the spying?

If Obama had in fact "wire-tapped" Trump tower, he would need court authorization to do so...either the FISA court if it involved intelligence matters or a Federal Court for criminal investigations. In both cases, Trump has yet to release any such request (and he, as President, has the power to do so).
 
Upvote 0

evoeth

Man trying to figure things out
Mar 5, 2014
1,670
2,079
✟151,370.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Correct. Here's a relevant excerpt from one of Sam Harris's podcasts on the subject that you may be interested in:
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
What do you mean? All of the information in the timeline came from published leftwing newspapers like the NYT.

I love how words like leftwing don't actually have a meaning for some people.
 
Reactions: GoldenBoy89
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Funny how So's Law just keeps getting verified over and over here.
 
Reactions: Allandavid
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
41,964
19,937
Finger Lakes
✟310,620.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What do you mean? All of the information in the timeline came from published leftwing newspapers like the NYT.

Once again, it wasn't Trump or Flynn who was being wiretapped, but the Russian ambassador - who met with Flynn while being recorded. Flynn got recorded as he was talking to Kislyak.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Whatever info was used to justify requesting the FISA court approval is now highly suspect. It now appears to have been mostly manufactured.
Only "mostly manufactured"? Interesting. Can you tell us what the non-manufactured evidence was that caused a Federal Judge to think there was sufficient cause to approve a wiretap as part of a criminal or national intelligence investigation of Trump's relationship with the Russians? Please be specific.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: evoeth
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I think the most revealing part of this timeline is how the moment anything comes to light about Trump's collusion with Russia, another pile of files comes out from putinleaks.
Total coincidence, I'm sure. We've been confidently told Wikileaks isn't trying to build any sort of narrative, unlike those evil people in the the intelligence community.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The other problem (as people like ex-advisor Flynn and current AG Sessions found out) is that the more you say the more chance there is you'll end up saying something that obviously isn't true - and more importantly, things that the intelligence community have solid documentation on. That's the sort of situation which exposes coverups which end Presidencies.
 
Reactions: camille70
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Here is the bottom line, people eventually grow tired of garbage rhetoric with no substance. It may take a while, but it happens. In fact, i believe this is the same reason people in general became fed up with establishment politicians.
 
Upvote 0