• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Obamagate Timeline...Explains A Lot

Veritas

1 Lord, 1 Faith, 1 Baptism
Aug 7, 2003
17,038
2,806
Pacific NW USA
Visit site
✟124,662.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
A Timeline of Events for Obamagate | politics

June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied. What’s really interesting is the FISA request was denied. That court has declined just 11 of the more than 33,900 surveillance requests made by the government. The FISA court has denied just .03% of all government FISA requests. The dots are slowly being connected regarding the Obama surveillance scandal, and it’s not looking good for Barack. The evidence is mounting there was a massive conspiracy to hurt President Trump. On June 27th of 2016, Bill Clinton met secretly with Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch at the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. This scandal, with so many unanswered questions, has not been resolved. Lynch did recuse herself from the Clinton email scandal. However new evidence suggests that meeting wasn’t about whether Hillary would go to prison, but one with a more insidious intent. Right after this meeting, Loretta Lynch made her first FISA request to tap Trump’s phones. Let that sink in for a minute. Bill Clinton has a secret meeting with the one person in the world who can, all by herself, derail Trump’s campaign.

October 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.

January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier” compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and that it had been circulating in Washington.

January 2017: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes, and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections....


January 2017: Times report. The New York Times reports, on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency working group to coordinate investigations across the government,” though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would have been secret and involved classified information.

February 2017: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials. The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

March 2017: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign...The New York Times, in covering the story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve” intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as well. It is also worth noting the Obama Administration had set up the meeting with Sessions and the Russian Ambassador last year


There are several other dates and info in-between. This is just the highlights. Pretty damaging for Obama, IMO. I certainly hope Congress investigates. This is the stuff of the Kremlin.

 

The Stamp

Active Member
Mar 7, 2017
217
190
35
UK
✟5,256.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Whatever the truth Trump has a problem, either the phone tap warrant was issued because the judge thought there was case to answer and the tap was justified or Trump is just telling lies, either way he is in trouble.
 
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Got any credible sources?
 
Upvote 0

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,355
Clarence Center NY USA
✟245,147.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Whatever the truth Trump has a problem, either the phone tap warrant was issued because the judge thought there was case to answer and the tap was justified or Trump is just telling lies, either way he is in trouble.

So are you saying that even if Trump is completely innocent of any wrong doing he is still in trouble because a judge may have thought there might be a possibility that he could have done something wrong when for the second time those politically opposed to Trump insisted that such a possibility existed? Or is it that you simply don't like Trump and will just assume the worst of him no matter what the facts might be?
 
Upvote 0

The Stamp

Active Member
Mar 7, 2017
217
190
35
UK
✟5,256.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I'm saying that judges do not allow wire taps for no reason, they don't issue them because someone has a hunch.
If one was issued then a judge was convinced it was justified, if there was no wire tap then Trump is telling lies, either way Trump has some explaining to do.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,355
Clarence Center NY USA
✟245,147.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Seems my original assesment of your position is pretty much on target.
 
Upvote 0

Veritas

1 Lord, 1 Faith, 1 Baptism
Aug 7, 2003
17,038
2,806
Pacific NW USA
Visit site
✟124,662.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Whatever the truth Trump has a problem, either the phone tap warrant was issued because the judge thought there was case to answer and the tap was justified or Trump is just telling lies, either way he is in trouble.

Whatever info was used to justify requesting the FISA court approval is now highly suspect. It now appears to have been mostly manufactured.
 
Upvote 0

Veritas

1 Lord, 1 Faith, 1 Baptism
Aug 7, 2003
17,038
2,806
Pacific NW USA
Visit site
✟124,662.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
As President, Trump has the power to release any FISA request. Why hasn't he Veritas?

I don't understand your question. Perhaps you're using the wrong words. Do you mean release information or stop the spying?
 
Reactions: brinny
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
26,153
28,838
LA
✟637,226.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Pretty damaging for Obama, IMO.
I'm sure you held him in such high esteem before all this came out. Darn shame Obama can no longer count on your support thanks to all this new info you found online.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
26,153
28,838
LA
✟637,226.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I think he's saying either the wiretap was warranted or Trump is a liar, and continues to disparage a former US President for no reason at all.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Just because a judge sees probable cause to grant a warrant, does not mean there is actual wrong doing. The warrant allows deeper investigation to possibly find wrong doing.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,197
17,034
Here
✟1,468,067.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Like many other Trump accusations...if he wants to put this to bed and prove that the "Fake News" is actually fake, and he's the one telling the truth, simply release the official information proving his story to be accurate. Why hasn't he done that?

If you have incriminating evidence against a former president and the general public has a poor perception of you, what better way to bolster your own credit than to definitively prove yourself right...why doesn't Trump do that?

He release these accusations on social media, and then doesn't ever support his statements with evidence.

What's surprising is that his die-hard supporters let it slide...if memory serves me correct, that was a group of people who were very hot and bothered about presidents needing to provide certain documentation about certain claims were they not?

They've gotten awful lax about documentation over the last few months...
 
Upvote 0

Veritas

1 Lord, 1 Faith, 1 Baptism
Aug 7, 2003
17,038
2,806
Pacific NW USA
Visit site
✟124,662.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
He release these accusations on social media, and then doesn't ever support his statements with evidence.

He doesn't need to. If you look at the photo I posted above of the NYT cover page, it states in the red circled headline "Wiretapped data used in inquiry of Trump aides". How did the NYT know this? It was leaked to them by traitors in the intelligence community. So the NYT has agreed with Trump (on this particular day) that he was spied on. But even worse, the NYT later came out and accused Trump of having no evidence that he was spied on. Hey NYT, which is it?
 
Upvote 0

FenderTL5

Κύριε, ἐλέησον.
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2016
5,671
6,635
Nashville TN
✟769,777.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity

I'm just curious, how many times have you actually read the source material in the links you're providing?
Because I'm reading it, and I'm coming to a different conclusion than you are.
 
Upvote 0