See, this is what I'm talking about. ISIS has neither the will nor the ability to "destroy America".
The will? Certainly. The ability? LOL, no.
Upvote
0
See, this is what I'm talking about. ISIS has neither the will nor the ability to "destroy America".
I wasn't speaking about Obama, but Putin. One tyrant supporting another. But when you back off from dealing with a tyrant, you do in fact support him. Do you remember Obama's line in the sand regarding chemical and biological weapons, which evaporated when push came to shove? That showed tacit support for the tyrant. And a mickey-mouse effort to deal with ISIS also showed on whose side he really is. ISIS could have been stopped in its infancy by a proper show of force, a proper strategy against terrorism, and a proper preventative handling of all the Americans and Canadians who flocked to ISIS. All travel to and from the Middle East should have come to a halt. Many other measures could have also been implemented.I don't remember anything about Obama supporting Assad?
Destroying the fabric of American society is also destruction. There are multiple ways that Islamic Jihad is conducted but the West by and large remains naive and stupid. Flooding western nations with Jihadists is a part of their strategy and Obama will bring in 200,000 as a Trojan Horse.The will? Certainly. The ability? LOL, no.
I wasn't speaking about Obama, but Putin.
One tyrant supporting another. But when you back off from dealing with a tyrant, you do in fact support him. Do you remember Obama's line in the sand regarding chemical and biological weapons, which evaporated when push came to shove? That showed tacit support for the tyrant.
They really don't. Stop listening to the alarmist hype.The will? Certainly.
Right.The ability? LOL, no.
Uh-huh.Destroying the fabric of American society is also destruction. There are multiple ways that Islamic Jihad is conducted but the West by and large remains naive and stupid. Flooding western nations with Jihadists is a part of their strategy and Obama will bring in 200,000 as a Trojan Horse.
Correct. Since you believe this is "alarmist" why don't you do a little serious digging from reliable conservative sources? The left-liberal media will never give you the truth. But we could go into great detail to support this statements.Uh-huh.
And you have evidence for this, obviously?
So, cite your evidence? Especially the 200,000 Jihadis on their way to the US.Correct. Since you believe this is "alarmist" why don't you do a little serious digging from reliable conservative sources? The left-liberal media will never give you the truth. But we could go into great detail to support this statements.
They really don't. Stop listening to the alarmist hype.
Nope. They're interest is in establishing a state of their own. All the anti-Western sentiment, death to America stuff included, is about driving a wedge between westerners and moderate Muslims, to increase the base sympathy for their cause, and recruitment. And frankly, buying into the hysterical belief that they pose any semblance of a threat to Americans is playing right into their strategy.You honestly don't think they want to destroy the US?
Nope. They're interest is in establishing a state of their own. All the anti-Western sentiment, death to America stuff included, is about driving a wedge between westerners and moderate Muslims, to increase the base sympathy for their cause, and recruitment. And frankly, buying into the hysterical belief that they pose any semblance of a threat to Americans is playing right into their strategy.
Ugh.Funny. I must have been transported into a parallel universe where I said that they have the ability to actually destroy the US. Because I have certain knowledge that I said the exact opposite.
They pose no existential threat to any country except Iraq and Syria. But they are most definitely a threat to all countries - particularly Western ones. How? Sleeper agents among the "refugees", for one. Internet recruitment of homegrown terrorirsts, etc.
Sure ISIS has threatened to sneak terrorists in with them, knowing the threat alone will make people flip out over accepting refugees, which is exactly the sort of thing ISIS wants. Such fretting completely fails to take into account that if ISIS wanted to send out terrorists, there's no reason they couldn't fly them to their target city on commercial airlines with legal visas. Sending a terrorist to his target along a dangerous and politically indefinite overland route, where he may not even end up in the right country, and may well be detained in immigration limbo for literally decades, is hardly the most efficient means of infiltration.Funny. I must have been transported into a parallel universe where I said that they have the ability to actually destroy the US. Because I have certain knowledge that I said the exact opposite.
They pose no existential threat to any country except Iraq and Syria. But they are most definitely a threat to all countries - particularly Western ones. How? Sleeper agents among the "refugees", for one. Internet recruitment of homegrown terrorirsts, etc.
Go here: http://www.oddee.com/item_98002.aspx , read it, then come back and tell me how big a threat to any country outside the middle east ISIS is.
Riiiiight.Go review the tapes from the Oklahoma bombing and the 9/11 event - notice "how many people it took"??
And then tell me how "big a threat" ISIS is to any country outside of the middle east
Israel faces this one-man-bomber scenario every day - but look what they have to do to keep a lid on it.
An old news item from 1998 -
"Last year, Gen. Alexander Lebed, Russia's former National Security Advisor, claimed more than 100 suitcase-sized nuclear weapons had 'disappeared.' Another senior Russian security official, Alexei Yablokov, backed Lebed's allegations."
http://www.monitor.net/monitor/9811a/copyright/em-suitcase.html
We have good reasons to want to have some decent boarder security - no matter what liberals say in their "nothing-can-go-wrong" stories.