• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,736.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Archivist said:
As to your question "Did Jesus wear clothes." At times he undoubtedly did. At other times he was most certainly naked. That's true for most of us today. There are times when we are wearing clothes and there are times when we are naked.
Do you think he went to the wedding an Cana naked?

Michelle
 
Upvote 0

Buzz Dixon

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2004
869
29
72
Los Angeles
✟1,184.00
Faith
Christian
Miss Shelby said:
BTW, I asked a question earlier. Did Jesus wear clothes?
Serious answer based on Biblical evidence: He may have slept in the nude. Sleeping in the nude may have been common in that era.

I cite where Christ told a parable where he said some who reach Heaven will do so as a sleeping man escaping a burning house would jump naked from the building. That seems to indicate sleeping in the nude was common enough for most people to understand the analogy.

Second, in one of the accounts of the events in the garden of Gethsemane (John? Can't recall accurately right now), there's the enigmatic account of a man draped in a linen cloth (some versions translate as sheet) hearing the comotion and coming up to see what was going on. The temple guards tried to arrest him but only managed to grab the sheet, and the man escaped naked into the night. The implication is that he was asleep when he heard the noise and wrapped a sheet around himself.

Y'know, Christ did his best work naked.

Think about it.
 
Upvote 0

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,736.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Buzz Dixon said:
Serious answer based on Biblical evidence: He may have slept in the nude. Sleeping in the nude may have been common in that era.
I am not speaking of sleeping in the nude. I am talking about public nudity.
I cite where Christ told a parable where he said some who reach Heaven will do so as a sleeping man escaping a burning house would jump naked from the building. That seems to indicate sleeping in the nude was common enough for most people to understand the analogy.
:thumbsup:
Second, in one of the accounts of the events in the garden of Gethsemane (John? Can't recall accurately right now), there's the enigmatic account of a man draped in a linen cloth (some versions translate as sheet) hearing the comotion and coming up to see what was going on. The temple guards tried to arrest him but only managed to grab the sheet, and the man escaped naked into the night. The implication is that he was asleep when he heard the noise and wrapped a sheet around himself.
It could have been his garment. But even if it was a sheet...he had the presence of mind to cover himself when heard people approaching. IOW, he didn't want anyone to see his tooshy.
Y'know, Christ did his best work naked.

Think about it.
I don't think this is funny.

Michelle
 
Upvote 0

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,736.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Buzz Dixon said:
I wasn't trying to be funny, I was just pointing out a Biblical truth.

Christ was willing to endure all things for us. We fear nothing if we love Him.
I don't see how using his passion and death can equate to his thread. It was a humiliating death. He suffered for us but I fail to see how somone wanting to frolick in the nude on a beach or whatever in a nudist colony can compare, nor do I find it a reasonable way to tribute anything to Christ.

But to each his own.

bye guys I have overstayed my welcome by now.

Michelle
 
Upvote 0

Shane Roach

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2002
14,552
1,328
57
✟23,036.00
Faith
Christian
Archivist said:
Actually I understand taht there were several of them protesting the GOP Convention just this week.

Again, my point is that you cannot make blanket statements like "it's always illegal" because it isn't.
Says a lot about the nature of the protesters.... :doh:

If the Republican party could just see its way clear to stop totally selling out to the wealthiest 2% of this country, they would win in a landslide. It's truly amazing.

Then too, if the Democratic party could see its way clear to stop totally selling out to the most immoral 2% of the country, they could win in a landslide as well. I guess it cuts both ways.
 
Upvote 0

Shane Roach

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2002
14,552
1,328
57
✟23,036.00
Faith
Christian
Archivist said:
Michelle,

I was simply trying to show that you cannot make blanket statements like saying that nudity is always illegal. As I have shown, it isn't. Instead of simply agreeing you started making statements like "what IS illegal and done anyway is sinful" in an effort to show that you initial statement was right. The problem is that you were wrong again because there have been and still are many unjust laws, and it is NEVER sinful to break an unjust law. I was in no way comparing Rosa Parks to going nude--the point was that, as I just said, it isn't sinful to braek an unjust law.

As to your question "Did Jesus wear clothes." At times he undoubtedly did. At other times he was most certainly naked. That's true for most of us today. There are times when we are wearing clothes and there are times when we are naked.
The 'real problem' here is that it is clear both what the Bible taught and what most societies do regarding nudism, and you are doing backflips to avoid the clear truth of the matter, in my opinion.

But then that's just me... :D Using bathtime or sleeptime as arguments for public nudity is just... unfathomably unconnected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miss Shelby
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Shane Roach said:
The 'real problem' here is that it is clear both what the Bible taught and what most societies do regarding nudism, and you are doing backflips to avoid the clear truth of the matter, in my opinion.

But then that's just me... :D Using bathtime or sleeptime as arguments for public nudity is just... unfathomably unconnected.

My understanding is that nudity was not as big a deal 2000 years ago as some people make it out to be today. It has already been pointed out that sleeping in the nude was the norm.

Depending on which version of the Bible you are using, it is possible that Peter was fishing naked when he saw Christ on the shore and jumped in to swim to him. Some translations say that he had taken off his outer garments while others say that he had removed his garments, indicating that he was naked. We do know that some of the artwork preserved from Roman times shows men naked in boats. So what you are calling "clear truth" isn't so clear.
 
Upvote 0

Shane Roach

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2002
14,552
1,328
57
✟23,036.00
Faith
Christian
Archivist said:
My understanding is that nudity was not as big a deal 2000 years ago as some people make it out to be today. It has already been pointed out that sleeping in the nude was the norm.

Depending on which version of the Bible you are using, it is possible that Peter was fishing naked when he saw Christ on the shore and jumped in to swim to him. Some translations say that he had taken off his outer garments while others say that he had removed his garments, indicating that he was naked. We do know that some of the artwork preserved from Roman times shows men naked in boats. So what you are calling "clear truth" isn't so clear.
Oh, but it is. Peter would not have fished nude because of the scriptured I have mentioned earlier regarding the long list of people who are not to be seen naked. Heck, there was a curse involved in well nigh accidentally seeing Noah naked, wasn't there?

The context is really more than clear. Roman artwork... :confused: :doh:

You try fishing in the nude sometime..... :o It's not as fun and comfy I bet as you seem to think it would be, and he was there after all working, not for his playtime.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Miss Shelby said:
This point was made by Archivist. He used Rosa Parks as an example, but thank you for that

Hiding Jews in nazi germany and nudism. Yes, I get the correlation.

Michelle,

No, you obviously don't get the correlation. The correlation is not between nudity and hiding Jews or nudity and Rosa Parks.

You were the one who wrote that "what IS illegal and done anyway is sinful." Buzz didn't write that, nor did I--you did. We are simply pointing out how very wrong that statement is because it is not sinful to break an unjust law.
 
Upvote 0

Shane Roach

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2002
14,552
1,328
57
✟23,036.00
Faith
Christian
Archivist said:
Michelle,

No, you obviously don't get the correlation. The correlation is not between nudity and hiding Jews or nudity and Rosa Parks.

You were the one who wrote that "what IS illegal and done anyway is sinful." Buzz didn't write that, nor did I--you did. We are simply pointing out how very wrong that statement is because it is not sinful to break an unjust law.
Which implies you think laws concerning public nudity are unjust, and you are using racism and mass genocide as your corallary examples..................................................................................................................................

Believe it or not, we are not absolutely blind to our own positions here.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Shane Roach said:
Oh, but it is. Peter would not have fished nude because of the scriptured I have mentioned earlier regarding the long list of people who are not to be seen naked. Heck, there was a curse involved in well nigh accidentally seeing Noah naked, wasn't there?

The context is really more than clear. Roman artwork... :confused: :doh:

You try fishing in the nude sometime..... :o It's not as fun and comfy I bet as you seem to think it would be, and he was there after all working, not for his playtime.

"Peter would not have fished nude." Were you there? How do you know this? I guess you know more about the subject than Biblical scholars.

I never said that he was out there for "playtime." Fishing was a very difficult occupation and it might have been more confortable naked.

By the way, I never said "Roman artwork," I said artwork from Roman times.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Shane Roach said:
Which implies you think laws concerning public nudity are unjust, and you are using racism and mass genocide as your corallary examples..................................................................................................................................

Believe it or not, we are not absolutely blind to our own positions here.

You are obviously blind to you own position, because you are agreeing that "what IS illegal and done anyway is sinful." Saving the Jews was sinful? Standing up to segregation was sinful? I don't think so!
 
Upvote 0

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,736.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Archivist said:
You were the one who wrote that "what IS illegal and done anyway is sinful." Buzz didn't write that, nor did I--you did. We are simply pointing out how very wrong that statement is because it is not sinful to break an unjust law.
I regret making that statement. Because there are things that people have done which have been against the law and later became legalized later. (and were not immoral)

HOWEVER, I think comparing the examples you two have given with nudism is comparing apples and oranges.

Michelle
 
Upvote 0

Shane Roach

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2002
14,552
1,328
57
✟23,036.00
Faith
Christian
Archivist said:
You are obviously blind to you own position, because you are agreeing that "what IS illegal and done anyway is sinful." Saving the Jews was sinful? Standing up to segregation was sinful? I don't think so!
So you really are drawing a parallel between genocide and nudity laws?

Ok....

*Ahem* What I saw in the response to your assertion about genocide or Rosa Parks was that Miss Shelby called you on the lack of corrolation between the "unjustness" of laws supporting genocide and laws concerning nudity. Perhaps you would like to elaborate then on what the correlation is, and how a law against nudity, well nigh universal in civilized nations, somehow violates your human or civil rights, since you seem to take this aspect of your argument more seriously than at first I presumed. :D
 
Upvote 0

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,736.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Archivist said:
"Peter would not have fished nude." Were you there? How do you know this? I guess you know more about the subject than Biblical scholars.

What Bible scholar ever asserted that Peter fished naked? This is getting ridiculous. LOL.. Peter DID NOT fish naked. Jesus wore clothes. It was and always has been customary for Jewish people to cover themselves...oh me oh my...lol... I can't believe this, Peter fished naked....

Michelle
 
Upvote 0