stringsinger
Junior Member
- Aug 19, 2005
- 29
- 2
- 66
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
larkspur said:Earlier in this post someone said that all guys can be tempted by nudity. I agree with that.. I'm not saying that all guys are perverts, BUT that God wired them to be visually oriented.. just like women are emotionally oriented.
I am so tired of hearing Christians toss off this idea that men are "wired to be visually oriented" as if this is an established fact. Where does this idea come from? Sex researchers who "test their hypothesis" by showing pornography to male and female subjects? Evolutionary psychologists who have a prior philosophical commitment to the physicalist idea that human beings are nothing more than machines programed to respond to their environments in ways that maximize reproductive advantage? There certainly is no biblical support for this view of human nature. I can personally attest that vision doesn't play a vital role in my sexual relationship with my wife. My responses come from my emotions of love, tenderness and admiration for her. This is just as true when the lights are out as when they are on. I strongly suspect in fact, that if I were to become blind my sexual relationship with my wife would not suffer in the least. We really do not advance the understanding of human nature or help the Body of Christ in any way by advancing these kind of silly ideas. Believe me, I am not faulting Larkspur here, he is only repeating what so many Christian leaders carelessly say.
What happens when we accept this lie and teach it? A woman so taught, may wrongly assume that all that is necessary for her to bring to her sexual relationship with her husband is for her to expose her body to him. What then when she begins to age a bit? Will she become become obsessed with retaining her youthful looks? Will he start searching for someone more visually pleasing because "after all that is how God designed him to function sexually?" No wonder so much of the Church behaves no differently than the surrounding culture when it comes to sexual ethics!
Let us apply an assumption of Intelligent Design in our thoughts about the psychology of human sexuality: God designed our bodies to be trainable to do various tasks though repetition. This is how we can learn to walk, ride a bicycle, drive a car or play a musical instrument. When we have practiced them enough, we can perform these tasks practically without thinking. Human sexuality is no different. If you want to know why so many men in our culture have a visually oriented sexuality, it is this: in our culture that shuns simple nudity, yet consumes massive quantities of pornography, men who repeatedly use porn to sexually stimulate themselves are literally training their bodies to respond sexually to visual images.
Men who live in cultures where nudity is common, don't have a sexual reaction whenever they see an exposed female breast. Men who do not use porn and who's primary experience of other naked human beings is in the context of social nudism where rules of behavior apply, are repeatedly "practicing" civil, non-sexual behavior toward others who are in their created state (naked.)
I am such a man (a nudist,) and I can assure you that my sexual relationship with my wife is both exclusive and satisfying and it is not in any way dependent upon visual stimulation.
-Gregg Gatewood (stringsinger)
Upvote
0