Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Now that... is just plain ironic.Blissman said:In an other case, while a visitor to a museum, a woman had stopped to breast feed her infant. She was arrested because there is no eating or drinking permitted in the museum.
Explain further....I'm not convinced....Vylo said:I've been led to believe being exposed to nudity can be harmful to children's development (and it has been confirmed that exposure to sex can), but have any studies been performed to show whether being constantly exposed to non-promiscuous nudity affects the development of children?
It'd be a lot helpful if you'd had a Bible next to you, than a goddess licking you in the ear...Myah said:A body is a body. We all have them..we all know what they basically look like. Clothing is simply used because of longstanding custom and tradition. I don't see how being in our bare form, which was given to us, would be considered "sinful"
You can work this our youself...ESV Romans 14:23 said:But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats, because the eating is not from faith. For whatever does not proceed from faith is sin.
I disagree. Nudity is not harmful to children. Shame of nudity is harmful. Perhaps it can be argued that it may be harmful past puberty. On the other hand, if it is normal to see everyone naked, there is no shame in being naked.Vylo said:I've been led to believe being exposed to nudity can be harmful to children's development (and it has been confirmed that exposure to sex can), but have any studies been performed to show whether being constantly exposed to non-promiscuous nudity affects the development of children?
Uh..what's the point of this quote? I don't recall reading anything about goddesses or divine wet willies in this thread. 0.0Icystwolf said:It'd be a lot helpful if you'd had a Bible next to you, than a goddess licking you in the ear...
Ahem...Icystwolf said:It'd be a lot helpful if you'd had a Bible next to you, than a goddess licking you in the ear...
Please make sure, that sin in Christianity, is not the same sin as you'd might expect from say, wicca or buddhism.....
In your own home , with spouse , so-kay .....Philosopher Odds said:I may have misinterpreted this, but having no clothes on is a sin? I tend to cringe when I see such things but that's crazy!
disagree. Nudity is not harmful to children. Shame of nudity is harmful. Perhaps it can be argued that it may be harmful past puberty. On the other hand, if it is normal to see everyone naked, there is no shame in being naked.
Talk about logic... The Bible doesn't speak so we have to "Read" the Bible... oh, but I forgot, I'm talking to a wicca...do you have a spell that would make the Bible read itself aloud?Myah said:Ahem...
It'd be a lot more helpful if you'd had the Goddess next to you, than a Bible Stuck in your ear...
If you don't believe in sin, then don't talk about sin... if you don't believe in sin, then you wouldn't be giving some opinion...why give an opinion if you don't believe in it?Sounds silly doesn't it. Well..what you said was only mildly offensive, so I'll just let it be.
That would work if I believed in sin, which I don't.