Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
i think that there are only two possibilities: creation or evolution. and we have many evidence for creation or id:As with many other things in life, we think in terms of two opposing sets of facts or opinions when, in reality, the truth is most likely somewhere in the middle.
i think that there are only two possibilities: creation or evolution. and we have many evidence for creation or id:
(image form VCAC: Cellular Processes: Electron Transport Chain: Advanced Look: ATP Synthase
Do you actually read anything anyone says to you? It would appear not. You have been told, with great clarity and precision that science does not deal with proof, so why are you asking for proof?That's all well and good, but would you like to back it all up with a rundown of your proof of evolution and an explanation on why it proves such, or do you just want to talk?
Bring it all together for us...or not.
i think that there are only two possibilities: creation or evolution. and we have many evidence for creation or id:
(image form VCAC: Cellular Processes: Electron Transport Chain: Advanced Look: ATP Synthase
i think that there are only two possibilities: creation or evolution.
Happy Birthday!
Do you actually read anything anyone says to you? It would appear not. You have been told, with great clarity and precision that science does not deal with proof, so why are you asking for proof?
You have a 105 page long thread where people explain to you your faulty logic and yet here you are continuing to post these already refuted arguments.
You are like the worst student ever.
Right back at you dear brother! I find it almost impossible to believe you have not seen multiple explanations, in summary form, of the evidence for evolution and links to textbooks and other scholarly resources addressing the same in more detail. Are you genuinely asserting that you have not seen any of these things? If so, I shall be happy to provide them, if you assure me that you will make a sincere effort to study them.
I hear you, but consider--many people believe that God created all that exists, but he did not do it in six twenty-four hour days.
Are they creationists or not? The OP implied that they are not. Indeed, the OP called them evolutionists.
Do you think, upon reflection, that there might be something wrong with the idea that we're all either creationists or evolutionists, period?
As a general rule, the term "creationist" on this board refers to a biblical creationist. All the rest of us, atheists, Christians and other theists, are known as "evolutionists." The distinction is between those who think the sciences of our origin are wrong, or lies, and those of us who pretty much accept them as they are.I hear you, but consider--many people believe that God created all that exists, but he did not do it in six twenty-four hour days.
Are they creationists or not? The OP implied that they are not. Indeed, the OP called them evolutionists.
Do you think, upon reflection, that there might be something wrong with the idea that we're all either creationists or evolutionists, period?
Do you actually read anything anyone says to you? It would appear not. You have been told, with great clarity and precision that science does not deal with proof, so why are you asking for proof?
I don't want to "only talk".
If you asked for "confirming evidence" instead of "proof" then nobody would hassle you about it. Is that too hard?Do you actually read all the posts where I explain how that is absolutely not true? What an arrogant comment you make. You act as if your word is to be taken as fact without question.
If you asked for "confirming evidence" instead of "proof" then nobody would hassle you about it. Is that too hard?
Then you are out of luck. All science has is confirming evidence, not proof.No, not hard at all. it's just that's not what I want... I want you all to stop doing the dosy doe and prove it.
If you can't prove it, then all you have is evidence that you interpret. You see what is called evidence, which in reality is just facts and interpret those facts to mean evolution from a common ancestor is true. Its all assumption or interpretation. Fact: Chimps and Humans have very similar genetic make up. Interpretation: We came from a common ancestorThen you are out of luck. All science has is confirming evidence, not proof.
So what? It's still the most reasonable inference from that evidence and much much more. What evidence would make annother inference more reasonable?If you can't prove it, then all you have is evidence that you interpret. You see what is called evidence, which in reality is just facts and interpret those facts to mean evolution from a common ancestor is true. Its all assumption or interpretation. Fact: Chimps and Humans have very similar genetic make up. Interpretation: We came from a common ancestor
Fact: ERVs when inserted go to similar places in the bodies of chimps and humans
Interpretation: We came from a common ancestor
Fact: Peppered moths changed their colors
Interpretation: all things came from a common ancestor
Fact: The apple maggot fly may show speciation
Interpretation: all things came from a common ancestor
Yet there is no proof that it actually happened nor is there any testable verifiable observable proof that it occurred.
No, not hard at all. it's just that's not what I want... I want you all to stop doing the dosy doe and prove it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?