Anything but deal with the facts, referred to, eh ? So, what's new ? tee hee tither tither. Do you really think the opinion of an agnostic, evidently, of an atheist persuasion, on the subject of the Discovery Institute, is worth squat ? Go back to sleep, there's a good chap.
Why should his stance as an agnostic on the question of knowledge of the existence of God of Gods have any bearing on the validity of his opinions about the Discovery Institute?
Or are we not meant to take the Discovery Institute seriously when they protest that ID is science, not religion?
Or should we observe reality as it is, and conclude that ID is just an attempt to circumvent the law and smuggle creationism into the science classroom? That it is, in fact, creationism dressed in a stolen a lab coat, spouting science-y but meaningless phrases, all while hurling itself about absolutely pointlessly and making spasmodic gyrations?
Upvote
0