To reply to that persons quote from your mystery source:slippedhole said:Sorry True Q, but I don't want to lead anyone down that road, so I won't be giving you the site name. I have prayed on this for a week and the holy spirit gave me the inspiration to seek out truely good sites and the people that contribute to them.
I mistakenly thought that I could fight for GOD using the same artillery they use. But what I now know is that I sank to their level and became as evil as they are.
I am having doubts of belief about God's gift of free will to man. Here are some point of arguement giving me problems (these points are directly quoted from a member of the site):
1) Free will is inconsistent with the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly just creator. Having created your past, present and future, and without the capacity resist the will of the omnipotent, there is no free will.
If, OTOH, you wish to stipulate that you can make your own choices regarding good and evil -- consider the following:
Imagine that everyone in the world suddenly "get's it" and drops in synchonous lockstep with "God's Will(TM)" (and thus tossing back this "gift" of free will) -- surely all that **** in Revelations will not then occur? Right? Otherwise where's the perfect justice?
But then that would mean that God's prediction of the future was wrong -- there goes omniscience.
Also, having stymied the Revelations excuse for exterminating most of humanity illustrates the possibility of resisting the will of God (as expresseed by the creation of a future where most of God's children(TM) have gone bad), thus tossing omnipotent out too.
2) This "gift" business. The "gift" of free will is not much of a gift if you are compelled to give it back by subordinating your will to God in exchange for not being tossed into a firey lake to burn for eternity. If someone offered me such a gift, Ii would tell him "no thanks".
1. This argument is flawed. Think of it in terms of a programmer. God is the architect and we are the design/program.
Every programmer, when first starting out, learns to "hard code" certain values. This provides very little use of ANY program. For example, if I want to write a medical program that shows your name, ID, and how much you owe to the hospital, I could simply type out your name, ID, and how much you owe.
That's not a problem if it is just for you, or maybe 10-100 people, but what if there are 10,000 people that owe money to the hospital? Hardcoding 10,000 "nodes" with repeating data is a BIG waste of time.
The solution is to create a "dynamic" system, in which you could set up the base structure and have the reoccuring data change with each individual client/individual.
In other words, God has put out a path for our lives, we are the data, and depending on what we want, we choose our own path whether or not it is Gods best for our life.
You could then make the argument that we, or "the data" as I've called it, are 'hardcoded' as well since God made us, but why would He do that just to have a system that He cannot benefit from?
If your not a programmer or don't think in terms of computers, think of it this way... Water in a river will eventually make it to the ocean. Now you can take a few droplets and move it forwards or backwards and it will still make it to the ocean (Fate, predetermination, the inconsistencies with God that this user made in argument #1). However, not all water goes to the ocean, some of it can be dragged out by bathing suits, drunk up by an animal, or any other number of conditions leading to a different end other than the ocean that wasn't directly affected by the original plan.
Of course, then again, you could say that a God, or fate, is inconsistent with free will because all of the "choices" we have were predetermined. Then I ask, why would an omnisious being, who says He desires a relationship with us (christian view), 'hardcode' our reactions? If I want love from someone, and I force someone to give it to me by my will, it is fake.
Love is a gift from one being to another, and that is what God wants from us. If we are hardcoded to give or not give him love, what is that?
Argument 2:
I don't submit my will to God becuase I am afraid of being tossed into a burning pit of fire. I submit my will to God because I know He has my best interests at heart (for real, I can private message my personal story as testamony) and I never go wrong with a decision I include God with.
Argument 2 is based on the fear, not love, which is the flaw in argument number 1.
Upvote
0