fragmentsofdreams
Critical loyalist
We express our unity in our shared purpose and faith, not in conformity of expression.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well, actually some asked Rome and the answer came down in a Dubium that they didn't mean to restrict us "to the letter" and it is really our choice to kneel, sit, or stand. (In the old GIRM, the U.S. Bishops actually received an indult from Rome to kneel during the entire Eucharistic prayer--not just at the Consecration as is the rule in the universal Church. In 2002, when the new GIRM came out, some places wanted us to only stand, so Rome was questioned about it and we were allowed to follow our conciences in this.)
As to the "handholding", it's not forbidden in the GIRM and nothing is said about it if it is voluntary and sort of "spur of the moment", however it does seem a little bit "inappropriate". Receiving the Eucharist is the main symbol of our unity--not holding hands. (Maybe when the new translation comes out, they'll move the "kiss of peace" Our Father--where the handholding usually takes place--to another part of the Mass so it won't overshadow Jesus' unity.)
Sources of this is the GIRM (naturally) and several articles on www.adoremus.org.
SO the Vatican used to rule throught he GIRM that all Catholics (Eastern and Western) -since you said the Church Universal - should kneel during the Eucharistic prayer? I have a feeling I misunderstood something.
What is the GIRM?
I guess I don't see how holding hands overshadows the Eucharist, but I suppose I would be among those not sad to see it go were I Catholic only because of my personal disposition (not for any theological or liturgical issue).
I am a HUGE supporter of the When in Rome policy. For example, we are to stand during the entire liturgy by custom and I agree with this custom (in the Eastern context). But if I visit a parish and they go up and down like a western parish, I am going up and down with them regardless of what is "Orthodox" and with a smile.
The Eucharist expresses our unity as the family of God much better than hand holding. One Bread, One Body.I dont mean this at ALL as a criticism but I was just curious, is this tradition based on an ancient one or is it moreso developped recently in an effort to express the Church as family?
Dear Jim,
Thank you for your question! It is right that Catholics usually kneel during the Consecration if there is adequate space to do so. Unfortunately, the space in which we worship presently is not our permanent Church and arrangements were made to fit a large congregation into a space that was given. Thus, the space limitation in our current space hampers our ability to kneel at this time. However, when our new Church gets built in the future, it will have kneelers to accommodate the congregation.
SO the Vatican used to rule throught he GIRM that all Catholics (Eastern and Western) -since you said the Church Universal - should kneel during the Eucharistic prayer? I have a feeling I misunderstood something.
What is the GIRM?
I guess I don't see how holding hands overshadows the Eucharist, but I suppose I would be among those not sad to see it go were I Catholic only because of my personal disposition (not for any theological or liturgical issue).
I am a HUGE supporter of the When in Rome policy. For example, we are to stand during the entire liturgy by custom and I agree with this custom (in the Eastern context). But if I visit a parish and they go up and down like a western parish, I am going up and down with them regardless of what is "Orthodox" and with a smile. If I ever get to the point that sitting down or touching a hand or kneeling at the "wrong time" in someone else's home get in the way of me worshiping God, then I have other issues and am hung up on the wrong things (and I have had to recognize these problems before and they are entirely personal for me).
However, if I am in my home, then I will follow my conscience which tells me to act as my bishop and priest would expect me to act generally speaking. so if I know I should stand and 80% of the Church sits, I will stand if I feel that is what is best for me because... I have to go there every week. I just think that in someone else's parish, house rules.
That may, however, just be what I need to keep myself humble.
By the way, I am not among the best of standers and there are many times I am with that "weak" 80% that sits and I don't lose sleep about thatand I don't think anyone else should either unless they did it to be uncourteous or a rebel or to attention to themselves. I agree with you that as important as all of that stuff is, it is, in the end, personal. I was just offering the standing as an example.
Joshua
SO the Vatican used to rule throught he GIRM that all Catholics (Eastern and Western) -since you said the Church Universal - should kneel during the Eucharistic prayer? I have a feeling I misunderstood something.
What is the GIRM?
Someone else in this thread made the comment that holding hands isn't specifically prohibited, but my problem with it is that it causes unnecessary confusion. Because it is not something that is taught that we should be doing, some do it while others don't.
Did they keep holding hands during the swine flew scare?LivingWordUnity;
If its done by the community as a whole, it doesn't cause confusion, but I'll admit, it causes irritation for some who happen to be visiting the parish and are opposed to it.
At my parish, which is a very small country parish, we always hold hands at every Mass. When I first move there, it was new for me, but was a nice gesture and so, I now hold hands as does my family.
However, when visiting other parishes, I follow what they do.
Jim
Did they keep holding hands during the swine flew scare?
You said that people seemed uneasy about offering the sign of peace. Did they also seem uneasy about holding hands during the swine flew scare?Yes, we did.
They also continued to offer the Precious Blood at Mass.
Some people seemed uneasy about offering the sign of peace, but then as they learned that the outbreak was over-blown, they relaxed about it.
In all, I don't get too hung up on such trivial matters. Christ is present whether we hold hands or don't.
Whats in the hearts of the faithful is what matters and that was the real spirit of Vatican II.
Jim
You said that people seemed uneasy about offering the sign of peace. Did they also seem uneasy about holding hands during the swine flew scare?
I think the parish size has a lot to do with it. At the large parish, a lot of the people who were there were probably like you, away from their own parishes. With the small parishes, people have a much better chance to get to know each other so the social atmosphere is often more friendly.Actually, I should've explained better, sorry.
The parish I was attending where the people seemed uneasy offering the sign of peace, was not my parish, and at this parish, they do not hold hands during the Lords Prayer. Its a larger parish with a Cathedral style church building.
At my small home parish(seats only @150 people), people seemed indifferent to the swine flue threat.
Jim
I think the parish size has a lot to do with it. At the large parish, a lot of the people who were there were probably like you, away from their own parishes. With the small parishes, people have a much better chance to get to know each other so the social atmosphere is often more friendly.
That's interesting. Maybe it's because it has become the cultural norm to hold hands, and people feel more inclined to do it because of the smaller cozy atmosphere. But anyway, what I do is if it looks like someone is reaching over to me then I will hold their hand. But if they make no effort to reach, then I won't reach their way.Actually, my parish has more visitors than the larger parish.
The town I live in, has 6 lakes(ponds actually), with many visiting campers. Also surrounding the parish property, is a private high-school with many foreign students.
People tend to go along with what the congregation does, and in my parish, we hold hands during the Lords Prayer. This includes the pastor at the altar with the Lector and Deacon.
So, what are you going to do, refuse the outreached person's hand next to you?
Jim
That's interesting. Maybe it's because it has become the cultural norm to hold hands, and people feel more inclined to do it because of the smaller "cozy" atmosphere. But anyway, what I do is if it looks like someone is reaching over to me then I will hold their hand. But if they make no effort to reach, then I won't reach their way.
.
Try a different parish.Hmm, now I feel kinda upset. I have been in a rather atheistic mood lately... but I've felt drawn to go to church the last few days, and when I went it just felt "wrong" somehow. I wish I had gone to a church that was doing things the way they're supposed to.
Interesting. I wondered about that.A devout Catholic friend of mine theorized (and read) that this western/estern difference was that in the West you always kneeled before a king and in the East you always stood before royalty? Has anyone else read or heard that?
Try a different parish.