NIV vs. KJV

[drummer4Him]

is the NIV a true Bible to follow or is there much more behind than what most people think?Should modern Christians trash the infallible KJV for a watered-down version of the Bible?

 

[Joykins]

That's one doozy of an assumption, that the KJV is infallible.

 

[drummer4Him]

Read the origin of ANY different version of the Bible you use.There are terrible things happening and happening FAST behind many of the modernized Bible versions.Ultimately a One-world Bible will be formed from the continuous versions of today.Study the history of the modern versions and ask GOD to help you make the decision.The Bible is very important and to trust in the interpretations of men is not always wise.

 

[drummer4Him]

Joykins,
many people have the idea that the KJV is Just another version but in fact,it is the FIRST version and the history of its making is by thorough translation from originalwords not men's interpretation as we are seeing now.Too many Christians are being blindly lead, I'm afraid,by modern "feel-good" versions

 

[drummer4Him]

some churches ,I suppose,are just scared to death of the truth

 

[God_of_Mercy]

I never understood KJV fanaticism.

 

[Joykins]

Joykins,
many people have the idea that the KJV is Just another version but in fact,it is the FIRST version and the history of its making is by thorough translation from originalwords not men's interpretation as we are seeing now.Too many Christians are being blindly lead, I'm afraid,by modern "feel-good" versions

First, it's not the first English translation. Wycliffe preceded it.

Secondly, it's a translation done in 1611. The scholarship was scholarship of 1611. The language was the language of 1611. There's a reason that's called EARLY modern English. Some of the words are no longer used or have changed meaning.

Thirdly, the more modern translations have incorporated more recent manuscript discoveries and have used almost an extra 400 years of scholarship information in creating them.

Fourthly when I grew up and studied Greek, I discovered that the KJV was not always the best translation of several of the verses I had questions about.

I have no problem with the KJV; it's the most poetic as far as I am concerned and I have done most of my scripture memorization with that version.

But I do have a problem with stating that KJV is infallible just because it reflects the speakers bias. All translations are subject to problems-in-translation.

 

[Paleoconservatarian]

I think the KJV is superior to the NIV, but I also have (and use) the NIV.

 

[Theophorus]

KJV vs NIV?

odds are 3-1 in favor of the KJV.

 

[Joykins]

I'm not speaking out only in favor of the NIV; I'm actually in favor of all reputable translations, preferably side-by-side, so that solid meanings as well as translator problems and biases become more obvious.

 

[grateful heart]

Both are evil and should not be read , I am translating my own and this is the only one everyone should use cause im Australian and Jesus was Australian so obvioulsy i am the man for the job


Ps if you think im serious please do not reply and embarress yourself

 

[drummer4Him]

Alright Joykins,
Then you might as well not read the Bible at all period.There is absolutely no sense in putting the KJV down just because you don't like the entire truth.And secondly you are not even touching the surface of how modernized versions were founded.And they also leave may words out such as sanctification,judgement,and holiness

 

[Caissie]

I will let these verses speak for me:

Below is from http://www.biblestuff.freerovin.com/favorite_links.html
(KJV) an angel (NIV) an eagle (Rev 8:13)
(KJV) the Spirit (NIV) the light (Eph 5:9)
(KJV) his house (NIV) her house (Col 4:15)
(KJV) the synagogues of Galilee (NIV) the synagogues of Judea (Luke 4:44)
(KJV) I [John] stood upon the sand of the sea (NIV) the dragon [Satan]
stood on the shore of the sea (Rev 13:1)
(KJV) Good things to come (NIV) good things that are already here (Heb.
9:11)
(KJV) do his commandments(NIV) wash their robes (Rev 22:14)

The following are just SOME of the many verses that are omitted from the NIV: [Some versions might put it in brackets, or put a footnote at the bottom of the page, or just totally skip that verse entirely!]
Mark 9:44
Acts 8:37
Acts 28:29
Matt 18:11
Mark 15:28
Rom 16:24
Matt 17:21
Matt 23:14
Mark 7:16
Mark 9:46
Mark 11:26
Luke 17:36
Luke 23:17
John 5:4
Acts 15:34
Acts 24:7

Is it hard to be saved? Jesus says no, "For my yoke is easy.." Matt 11:30,
but the NIV says yes.
Mark 10:24
..."Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! (NIV)
...Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!(KJV)


Did Lucifer fall from heaven, or did Jesus fall from heaven?
Isaiah 14:12
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer,...(KJV)
How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star,...(NIV)

Jesus is the morning star. "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto
you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David,
and the bright and morning star." Rev 22:16


Let us see what the NIV did to John 3:16
When we ask Jesus into our
lives we become the "sons of God", he adopts you into his family. (1 John
3:1 and 2).
Now, everyone knows John 3:16:
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son...(KJV)
Lets see what the NIV did to confuse the Word of God:
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son... (NIV)

Now, wait a minute, I thought we are also his sons?
The NIV also removed "begotten" from John 1:14 and John 1:18.

What does the NIV have against fasting?
Acts 10:30
...I was fasting until this hour; and at the ninth hour I prayed...(KJV)
...I was in my house praying...(NIV)

1 Corinthians 7:5
...give yourselves to fasting and prayer;(KJV)
...devote yourselves to prayer. (NIV)

Mark 9:29
And he said unto them, This kind can come forth by nothing, but by prayer and fasting.(KJV)
He replied, "This kind can come out only by prayer.(NIV)


Matthew 17:21
Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.(KJV)
(The NIV OMITTED the WHOLE VERSE!) I guess they didn't think that verse was important even though our Lord Jesus said it.


Lets see what the NIV did to The Lord's Prayer.

Luke 11:2-4
Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. Give us day by day our daily bread. And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil. (KJV)

Father, hallowed be your name, your kingdom come. Give us each day our daily bread. Forgive us our sins, for we also forgive everyone who sins against us. And lead us not into temptation
(NIV)

 

[Lynn73]

is the NIV a true Bible to follow or is there much more behind than what most people think?Should modern Christians trash the infallible KJV for a watered-down version of the Bible?

You may like this site. I found it while surfing one time and thought it was very good. I assume you prefer the Textus Receptus, the KJV. So do I! My pastor and most in my church use the NIV and the NIV Bible is what is provided in the pews but I'm sticking with the KJV.


http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/another.htm

 

[JayJay77]

Considering that it took 13 years to complete the entire Bible translation (from 1965-1978) and that it was translated by a multi-denominational group of men that translated each book individually, then had it revised by others 3 different times for a check of english style and it's faithfulness to the original language (whether Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek), the NIV shouldn't be taken lightly. Literally thousands of hours went into this particular translation with plenty of accountability.

I prefer the NIV to the KJV and even the NKJV, which many of my "friends" have rebuked me for.

 

[drummer4Him]

What can I expect?This is the last Church age and so many churches in prospering nations are everything but dead.I dont even call them churches anymore,but large organizations seeking after the pleasure money and size in members.
A very "convenient"way of doing this is by the translation of their own Bible.

 

[grateful heart]

Caissia is this the same with the NKJV?

 

[grateful heart]

What can I expect?This is the last Church age and so many churches in prospering nations are everything but dead.I dont even call them churches anymore,but large organizations seeking after the pleasure money and size in members.
A very "convenient"way of doing this is by the translation of their own Bible.

how do you figure this????

 

[drummer4Him]

grateful heart,
Show me a nation-wide revival in the prosperous countries and then I might you can prove yourself correct

 

[JimfromOhio]

My church uses NIV.
I use the following translations:
1. NKJV
2. NIV
3. KJV
4. NLT

All translations (i.e. KJV, RSV, NIV and etc) themselves are not inspired. Only the originals are inspired. However, the Holy Spirit have been with the translators while they were translating. Remember, God is control and keep in mind, its good to see 66 books agree with one another.

About KJV, I love KJV and I use it when I seriously study. My problem is Churches who prefer "KJV only" will have problems reaching out the lost who do not understand KJV. The Churches who spread the gospel using only KJV in my opinion are not doing what Jesus Christ expected them to do as He commanded the "Great Commission". In order to have evangelism ministries, we need to use the language people can understand. Those KJV-only do not apply grace to their ministries simply because they are expecting (in legalism term) that every english speaking sinner and born again believers to READ KJV. The purpose to spread the gospel is to spread the Word of God in person's own language level, not the Church tradition's language level. Grace means to help the lost to KNOW Christ and have them understand salvation in their own level of english skills.

The first Authorized version was written in 1611. Current KJV Bible was written in the language of 1700's. While it is not hard to read but takes LONGER to comprehend what is being said. There are other translations have done a good job making english translation more current to our own english language.

King James Version
Reading Level: 12.00
Readability: Difficult to read due to 17th-century English vocabulary and word order
Reference Support Material: High
Number of Translators: 54
Translation Philosophy/Format: Word-for-word
Notes: Traditionally loved and accepted by all Christians. Purpose in translation was "to deliver God's book unto God's people in a tongue which they can understand." Published in 1611. Timeless treasure.
Source: Translations

It so is sad to hear people looking down at Christians who don't read KJV. I have been in ministries to those who don't have good education (these are english speaking people who are born in the USA). I once was KJV only but I have HUMBLED and learned that I have to be patience to those who cannot. Even if they have the heart to TRY their best. This is where Christians are in the dark in the Great Commission, who are willing to be "blinded" by personal preference of a particular translation. There is no compassion. There is lack of understanding what is going on in the Christian world. My only hope that those who truly love God’s word will allow whatever the translation they use for their spiritual growth, rather than the personal preferences men and women (also known as legalism). We are to rely on the Holy Spirit when we read our Bibles. God gives us spiritual knowledge with the help from the Holy Spirit. Believing in Christ is not an intellectual exercise though it involves the mind. Believing in Christ is a heart and life commitment to the Savior.