I see, so we should vote for unrepentant heathens and hope that they govern in a Christ like way.
Where are you getting that from scripture?
First of all, the New York Times is the biggest liar in print. Second, and most important, what is the relevance of this conjured up smear in a Christian forum?New York Times: Tax records show Trump maintains Chinese bank account - CNNPolitics
I thought this part was particularly interesting:
which means he paid China quite a bit more in taxes than he paid here.
tulc(guesses "America First" doesn't include taxes)
Can you prove what was said in the OP is a lie? If you can, than please do so. Otherwise it would appear you are calling them "the biggest liar in print" because you don't like or agree with what they said rather than because something is true or not. Liking or not liking what's said doesn't actually make something true or not. See the difference?First of all, the New York Times is the biggest liar in print.
I'm curious: when did telling the truth about something (whether it's on a Christian or a non-Christian forum) become a "smear"?Second, and most important, what is the relevance of this conjured up smear in a Christian forum?
Can you prove what was said in the OP is a lie?
He made a claimYou're asking him to prove a negative based on information only the NYT's claims to have.
That's not possible
and seemed to be saying that means the OP is a lie. I actually gave him the easier of the two claims made there: show the OP is wrong, when I could have said "Provide proof the New York Times is biggest liar in print.".the New York Times is the biggest liar in print.
He made a claim
and seemed to be saying that means the OP is a lie. I actually gave him the easier of the two claims made there: show the OP is wrong, when I could have said "Provide proof the New York Times is biggest liar in print.".
tulc(would actually be interested in seeing either of those proved if rom8:38 has the proof)
...well except for all the links in their article of course, which led to several other sites with more links in those articles and those led to other sites...with more links in them. So when you say "they didn't provide proof" you appear to just be ignoring the links they provided. All that aside I would be just as happy if he supplied support for the claim that "the New York Times is the biggest liar in print.". Which even you will agree that's a claim that should be proven. Or withdrawn. Either of those two would be fine.You asked to prove that the report that the NYT's made is a lie. That's not possible being it's a negative and the NYT's didn't provide proof to support their claim.
fine, then all that's left now is proof for his claim about the New York Times being the biggest liar in print.It would be more credible to ask the NYT's to prove their report true, which they won't.
If you watch the debate.. It's now known that the bank account was very common knowledge and was closed before he was even elected..If you do business in a foreign country like China, you generally have to set up a bank account in that country to help handle transfer of investment funds.
This is what Trump did.
However, he also shut down that bank account before he decided to run for president.
The NYT's doesn't like Trump and I take whatever they report against him, with a grain of salt.
Or it's true, I have an OP article that supports what I said, and you have..."nu uh!"?Fake news as usual
The lack of context to those sound bites devalues the point being made.Hardly.
Take a look at the stats of how much money illegal immigration costs directly and indirectly, including increased crime, and then say that.
BTW the Democrats are on video, supporting building of a border barrier, and stopping illegal immigration, and sounding exactly like Trump - they thought building a barrier and ending illegal immigration was a great idea, in 2006.
Or it's true, I have an OP article that supports what I said, and you have..."nu uh!"?
tulc(is just sayn')
Ahhh!...I see the problem now: you seem to believe that an opinion is the same thing as a fact. That's not actually true. so if we take your post and break it up into two parts:Tulc, you have a history of posting, what i would call 'fake news' when it comes to Trump.
Lost4words (just stating the facts)
and this part will be "B"Tulc, you have a history of posting, what i would call 'fake news' when it comes to Trump.
the "A" part is actually just your opinion of what I postLost4words (just stating the facts)
It's been said...."If journalism loses touch with ethical values it ceases to be of use to society... Which.. has now happened.Or it's true, I have an OP article that supports what I said, and you have..."nu uh!"?
tulc(is just sayn')
...well except for all the links in their article of course, which led to several other sites with more links in those articles and those led to other sites...with more links in them. So when you say "they didn't provide proof" you appear to just be ignoring the links they provided. All that aside I would be just as happy if he supplied support for the claim that "the New York Times is the biggest liar in print.". Which even you will agree that's a claim that should be proven. Or withdrawn. Either of those two would be fine.
fine, then all that's left now is proof for his claim about the New York Times being the biggest liar in print.
tulc(will be watching for that proof)
If you watch the debate.. It's now known that the bank account was very common knowledge and was closed before he was even elected..
Just more spam news from democrat campaigning hacks that try to pass off as journalists.. but... eat crow all week long.
We never see the OP posting on how the Biden's are now exposed as total liars as Joe tried to say the emails of Hunter's antics were Russian plants..
The partner, an ex marine, came out and exposed the liars and is giving all his phones and data to the FBI.....
Or it's true, I have an OP article that supports what I said, and you have..."nu uh!"?
tulc(is just sayn')
Truth is very hard to find these days.New source are suppose to report truth, not politically damaging stories they've made up.
The NYTs, like the Washington Post and CNN, has given Trump's narrative about "Fake News," credibility. These news sources are abusing the 1st amendment as the people have lost confidence from these news sources. BTW, Fox isn't much better, just the opposite side of the same coin.
Trump also explained... to those who will listen... he prepaid taxes...The links merely refer back to the NYT's story. They never saw Trump's tax return and can't produce them, nor the source of their story.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?