new theory...

[theforeman]

Hey, new to the forums here, want to say 'hi' to all...hope God is not part of your life, but 'all' of your life....

I have studied frequencies/soundwaves for years...and when I was studying the word a few months ago I came across a new theory...

The core or base element of all energy is a frequency...

After studying sub-atomic particles for a time I understand that the core element to atoms/mass is a frequency, but not all scientist agree, because this is very new evidence in the scientific world....I have not had complete agreement with this theory, which I call "palmer's theory", but no one has been able disprove this theory or law...

any input would appreciated...and God bless......

thanks.....

 

[Wiccan_Child]

Hey, new to the forums here, want to say 'hi' to all...

Yo

I have studied frequencies/soundwaves for years...and when I was studying the word a few months ago I came across a new theory...

The core or base element of all energy is a frequency...

Could you elaborate? Energy is a quantity that does work. It doesn't have a frequency.

After studying sub-atomic particles for a time I understand that the core element to atoms/mass is a frequency,

The core element is the constituent particles. How they vibrate is neither here nor there.

but not all scientist agree, because this is very new evidence in the scientific world....

I don't suppose you could cite this evidence?

I have not had complete agreement with this theory, which I call "palmer's theory",

"Palmer's theory" typically refers to "Palmer's theory of music". You might want to pick a different name.

but no one has been able disprove this theory or law...

With all due respect, you haven't given us anything to disprove.

 

[Cabal]

Hey, new to the forums here, want to say 'hi' to all...hope God is not part of your life, but 'all' of your life....

I have studied frequencies/soundwaves for years...and when I was studying the word a few months ago I came across a new theory...

The core or base element of all energy is a frequency...

After studying sub-atomic particles for a time I understand that the core element to atoms/mass is a frequency, but not all scientist agree, because this is very new evidence in the scientific world....I have not had complete agreement with this theory, which I call "palmer's theory", but no one has been able disprove this theory or law...

any input would appreciated...and God bless......

thanks.....

Sorry mate, gonna need a lot more than that.

And btw, matter waves are well-established and long-accepted.

 

[theforeman]

well, without a frequency no energy can be made..such as light.that is simple and obviouse..but the base or core element of all particles is a freqeuncies...a freqeuncy holds together atoms at the core...the way I see it, is with a soundwave or freqeuncy (f) you cannot build upon anything that is real or that is energy....without a freqeuncy you cannot have sound, light, atoms,particle,mass...you really have nothing...without a freqeuncy you would not exist...and nothing around us would exist.............

 

[Cabal]

well, without a frequency no energy can be made..such as light.that is simple and obviouse..but the base or core element of all particles is a freqeuncies...a freqeuncy holds together atoms at the core...the way I see it, is with a soundwave or freqeuncy (f) you cannot build upon anything that is real or that is energy....without a freqeuncy you cannot have sound, light, atoms,particle,mass...you really have nothing...without a freqeuncy you would not exist...and nothing around us would exist.............

Well.....on the scale of an individual atom, I would say the concept of a soundwave becomes somewhat meaningless, seeing as soundwaves are pressure waves propagating through collections of atoms.

Matter waves, however, do indeed become meaningful on atomic scales.

I'm sorry, I'm not quite getting how the frequency itself is significant - I would have thought mass-energy equivalence would be a much more unifying factor for forms of matter, electromagnetic radiation, etc.

 

[theforeman]

without a freqeuncy how would you have light...?
without a freqeuncy how would you have sound..?
without a freqeuncy how would atoms/sub-atom particles stay together to make the atom itself....?

 

[Penumbra]

without a freqeuncy how would you have light...?
without a freqeuncy how would you have sound..?

Without wavelength, how would you have light?
Without wavelength, how would you have sound?

Point: Frequency and wavelength are concepts based on things that exist, so I don't think they are the basis for things. They're just two sides of the same coin.

without a freqeuncy how would atoms/sub-atom particles stay together to make the atom itself....?

With gluons I suppose. Instead of asking without frequency how would atoms stay together, you should try to prove that frequency actually has something to do with it in the first place. Unless you mean like string theory where particles are all made based on string frequencies...

 

[sbvera13]

Frequency (along with wavelength and amplitude) are measurments of behavior of energy. They are not innate properties.

A light wave fluctuates a certain number of times per second. That number is the frequency. The existance and movement of the wave is the fundamental property, not the frequency. The frequency merely tells you a little bit about what it is and how it acts.

 

[Wiccan_Child]

without a freqeuncy how would you have light...?
without a freqeuncy how would you have sound..?

Frequency is a property of light and sound, it doesn't actually make them. Light and sound exist because of completely different reasons.

without a freqeuncy how would atoms/sub-atom particles stay together to make the atom itself....?

The Strong Nuclear force.

 

[LifeToTheFullest!]

I have studied frequencies/soundwaves for years...and when I was studying the word a few months ago I came across a new theory...

Hi and welcome.

Could you please elaborate as to what extent you "have studied frequencies," and what "word" were you studying that inspired a "new theory."

Thanks.