Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What about them? Didn't I already answer the question? An all powerful God can create a system of galaxies in any state he chooses. Those craters could have appeared naturally and gradually over the course of time, or he could have painted each one individually with the tip of his finger in a matter of seconds.
I am no scientist but have read enough to know that these theories have huge holes in them. If you really cared to know you could spend a few weeks doing your own research.
The founder of carbon dating himself even believed it would take no more than 30,000 years for the atmosphere on earth to reach equilibrium. Yet it still has not reached that state, which means the atmosphere can not be more than 30,000 years old.
The simple lack of "the missing link" should be enough to make you question evolution.
The odds of all the necessary molecules mutating at the same time to create legs are incredible and statistically impossible even over billions of years.
The theory of natural selection is supposed to explain "survivability" traits, yet humans have the ability to be artistic and musical and thoughtful for no apparent useful reason.
There's just not enough information. And the fact that it's such a hugely political issue makes it incredibly susceptible to tampering, as we've seen with climategate and other UN sanctioned "studies".
You sound like a spoiled child who feels his parents rules are unfair.
If you don't believe that God exists then there's no point in trying to play by "his rules". I get that. But if you choose not to "play by his rules" because you don't like the idea of an authoritative God over your life, then you're just being arrogant and foolish.
Carbon dating assumes that the carbon that has been entering the earth's atmosphere has been doing so at a consistent rate. This is a huge assumption. It also assumes that the ratio between C12 and C14 has always been a constant. Without knowing the correct ratio, you can not know the correct age. Some scientists have even referred to the state of carbon dating as a crisis due to its unreliability and inaccuracy.
The founder of carbon dating himself even believed it would take no more than 30,000 years for the atmosphere on earth to reach equilibrium. Yet it still has not reached that state, which means the atmosphere can not be more than 30,000 years old.
For evolution, the onus is on the evolutionists to prove their theory correct which they have yet to do. The simple lack of "the missing link" should be enough to make you question evolution.
No creature has ever turned into anything new. Even the extremely fast life of the fruit fly has never yielded any evidence of evolution. Though there may be variations in creatures they always remain the same creature. A fish does not turn into a reptile. It's physically impossible.
The odds of all the necessary molecules mutating at the same time to create legs are incredible and statistically impossible even over billions of years. It just wouldn't happen.
The theory of natural selection is supposed to explain "survivability" traits, yet humans have the ability to be artistic and musical and thoughtful for no apparent useful reason. Everything about the creatures on earth screams intelligent design, but I guess that's too obvious for the "scientists".
I don't even want to get started on global warming. There's just not enough information. And the fact that it's such a hugely political issue makes it incredibly susceptible to tampering, as we've seen with climategate and other UN sanctioned "studies". Personally I doubt that man made CO2 could affect the planet in such a drastic way that some people are predicting.
It's a ridiculous notion, obviously. What's even more ridiculous is your insinuation that one believer speaks for all. There are obviously many disagreements within Christianity, just as there are disagreements within every belief system, even science.
This cannot be overstated: you have no clothes. You have no evidence that you would consider in opposition. You have nothing but faith. And faith is a glorification of ignorance.
Science has disproved nothing from scripture. In fact, as archaeological discoveries continue around the world, science continues to validate scripture.
What's even more ridiculous is your insinuation that one believer speaks for all. There are obviously many disagreements within Christianity, just as there are disagreements within every belief system, even science.
Faith is nothing like what you claim.
Faith is nothing like what you claim.
Proverbs 14:14
The faithless will be fully repaid for their ways, and the good rewarded for theirs.
Proverbs 16:6
Through love and faithfulness sin is atoned for; through the fear of the Lord evil is avoided.
Proverbs 28:20
A faithful person will be richly blessed, but one eager to get rich will not go unpunished.
Luke 7:50
Jesus said to the woman, Your faith has saved you; go in peace.
Luke 17:19
Then he said to him, Rise and go; your faith has made you well.
Luke 18:42
Jesus said to him, Receive your sight; your faith has healed you.
Romans 3:22
This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe.
Romans 14:23
everything that does not come from faith is sin.
I wonder why!?Don't be ridiculous! There hasn't been one archaeological discovery to support the Exodus story.
Don't be ridiculous! There hasn't been one archaeological discovery to support the Exodus story. It's a completely fictitious story. It never happened.
Really?
I wonder why!?
And while these verses aren't specifically talking about the Exodus, the principle certainly is there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?