Quote:
Originally Posted by ddub85
The farce is you saying that whatever is in Christ is yours.
Offend in what way? Do you believe that or not? How is that offensive? Please explain.
You're saying you aren't offended by someone saying you're a farce?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddub85
One solid proof that you're wrong is that Gentiles, as joint-heirs, receive what they've been ALLOTTED, not whatever is in Christ. That's what the Bible says. You, however, are saying something totally different from what the Bible says.
What you believe is that Gentiles receive all of the promises (do you not?), and the Bible never says that. That belief isn't in Ep 2.
All the promises in Christ
are yes to you and me.
The distinction in [promises | promise] is artificial, hit-upon solely to satisfy a theology. Demonstrate which promises Paul meant did not extend to Gentiles.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddub85
Only according to the bible of heymikey. The REAL Bible says no such thing. I CHALLENGE YOU to show proof of what you're saying. Let's see how you support what you say (although I already know that you can't).
So... now you want to say Ep 2 says those in Christ receive all of the promises? That is a farce. It simply isn't the truth. That is a complete misrepresentation of Ep 2.
It is the truth. If
you're a fellow-citizen with the citizens of Israel in the nation of God, what promises devolve to you that are any differently extended to Israel by God?
Fellowheir sygklēronomos (Strong's 4789) 1) a fellow heir, a joint heir
2) one who obtains something "ASSIGNED" to himself with others, a joint participant
A) Therefore, this verse says Gentiles are those who obtain what is ASSIGNED to us.
Doesn't follow. If we're assigned the same as the others, along with the others, that makes us
equal parties in the inheritance.
And that's what Paul says.
This mystery is that the
Gentiles are fellow
heirs, members of the same body, and partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel.
Of course, you'll obsess on the fact that "promise" is singular. It doesn't mean what you think it means. Demonstrate Biblically that's what it means and we'll talk. Otherwise, the assertion isn't found in the Bible.
B) "partakers of THE PROMISE"(singular)... not promises (plural).
You say we receive all promises, Ep 3:6 says we Gentiles receive what we've been ASSIGNED. You say we are partakers of all of the promise, Ep 3:6 says we are partakers of the one promise. Yet, you attempt to use this verse as your proof. Go figure.
No, I've already pointed out Paul uses "promises" elsewhere in Scripture to refer to us. He's not making the distinction you want him to make.
And you totally ignored my response to your misrepresentation of this scripture. Here it is again;
But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been...
A) "brought near by the blood of Christ."
B) "made Israel, and are now Israelites."
Let's see...
I've no idea where you said, it, but it's no misrepresentation. We're
made one new man by Christ's blood. Try to award different promises to parts of one man.
It can't be done.
We're not made national
Israel any more than God really wished to make a nation like the Gentile nations. He didn't. So we're not.
But then, national Israel isn't what God wanted it to be.
We are. We're one. We're the nation God made promises to.
A) fellow citizens
B) Israel, and privy to all of the promises.
Let's see...
Ultimately, as you're saying it, we're second-class citizens in the nation of God. The Jewish people get multitudes of promises from God, we poor Gentiles, but one.
No. I'm much more comfortable recognizing that God made promises to the nation, the people, that God created and chose out of the world. He's not that obsessed with what those He didn't chose, did with His promises (cf. Rom 9 soc, Rom 11 soc).