New CF - finally...

cygnusx1 · Jul 11, 2007

sparklecat said:
It's a negative personal statement; even if you didn't mean it to be insulting, I think it's difficult to make that sort of statement appear otherwise.

it's inline with many scriptures , not least Acts 8!

I see no problem with speaking the truth in love , even if "feelings" get hurt ....... political correctness is pretty pathetic.

acts 8

speaking to a person who supposed he was Christian , but who had no real signs of such ;

20] But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money.
[21] Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God.
[22] Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee.
[23] For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity.
[24] Then answered Simon, and said, Pray ye to the Lord for me, that none of these things which ye have spoken come upon me.

Morcova · Jul 11, 2007

A Taffer said:
Ok regardings the overzealous christians bit. If those were people outside this forum, elsewhere in the world. Does it really make it right for you to come here and do what you said you do even though no one here did that to you? Why not take it directly to who offended you instead of waving broad attacks against the general christians of the world or this forum for that matter.

You assume he's not talking about people on this very forum.

sparklecat · Jul 11, 2007

cygnusx1 said:
it's inline with many scriptures , not least Acts 8!

I see no problem with speaking the truth in love , even if "feelings" get hurt ....... political correctness is pretty pathetic.

acts 8

speaking to a person who supposed he was Christian , but who had no real signs of such ;

20] But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money.
[21] Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God.
[22] Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee.
[23] For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity.
[24] Then answered Simon, and said, Pray ye to the Lord for me, that none of these things which ye have spoken come upon me.

Fair enough. I just have trouble perceiving something as loving if it's said in an antagonistic manner.

Morcova · Jul 11, 2007

Purifying FLAME said:
I don't think he ever said it was a democracy. Erwin is still the benevolent dictator and owner of the forums.

True, he's the boss. He's just allowing the work floor to run itself.

Morcova · Jul 11, 2007

MelzluvsJesus said:
but in fairness..why let the general public vote to un ban a person? Erwin should be the one to unilaterally do that in light of his new rules. I mean, ones that weren't trolls etc.

One of the biggest problems this board had is that there were people who the biggest crime you could commit and the fastest way to become a "troll" was to disagree with them. All they had to do then was find a moderator that agreed with them and that person was getting in trouble.

cygnusx1 · Jul 11, 2007

sparklecat said:
Fair enough. I just have trouble perceiving something as loving if it's said in an antagonistic manner.

is it true that a Satanist could be a mod on these boards ?

sparklecat · Jul 11, 2007

cygnusx1 said:
is it true that a Satanist could be a mod on these boards ?

Theoretically, yes. Assuming they let it be known that they were a Satanist, I don't know how they'd do in the elections process.

Morcova · Jul 11, 2007

MelzluvsJesus said:
wow. this is so sad..ERWIN. do you see that you sold out?

To whom or what has he sold out?

Lindon Tinuviel · Jul 11, 2007

cygnusx1 said:
is it true that a Satanist could be a mod on these boards ?

How do you know that there's not one already?

Morcova · Jul 11, 2007

Does anybody here honestly believe that a satanist could get elected? This board is still massively christian.

Morcova · Jul 11, 2007

Vote_For_Pedro said:
The Tower of Babel: Unity without TRUTH
God judged it.

You must have read a different story than i did.

cygnusx1 · Jul 11, 2007

sparklecat said:
Theoretically, yes. Assuming they let it be known that they were a Satanist, I don't know how they'd do in the elections process.

so if enough Satanists reading this wished to take a role on this forum , all they would need is votes right ?

what is to stop anyone from moving themselves into positions of "power" /...

also , who voted for the 'team' on say , the new rules on the new CF ?

The Julikenz · Jul 11, 2007

WOW.

sparklecat · Jul 11, 2007

cygnusx1 said:
so if enough Satanists reading this wished to take a role on this forum , all they would need is votes right ?

what is to stop anyone from moving themselves into positions of "power" /...

also , who voted for the 'team' on say , the new rules on the new CF ?

They may or may not also need a current moderator to nominate them; I'm not sure what the current thoughts are on this.

The teams that make up the rules are self-selecting; if you want a say, you have to go over to the discussion and join in.

Lindon Tinuviel · Jul 11, 2007

cygnusx1 said:
so if enough Satanists reading this wished to take a role on this forum , all they would need is votes right ?

what is to stop anyone from moving themselves into positions of "power" /...

also , who voted for the 'team' on say , the new rules on the new CF ?

What 'team'?

cygnusx1 · Jul 11, 2007

sparklecat said:
They may or may not also need a current moderator to nominate them; I'm not sure what the current thoughts are on this.

The teams that make up the rules are self-selecting; if you want a say, you have to go over to the discussion and join in.

so the teams that are making democratic rules for others are self-selecting.

thanks for the heads -up sc.

*Starlight* · Jul 11, 2007

The Julikenz said:
WOW.

I agree with this reaction

cygnusx1 · Jul 11, 2007

Lindon Tinuviel said:
What 'team'?

http://www.christianforums.com/t5670...ums-rules.html

Contributors: Gwenyfur, Erwin, PassthePeace1, mnphysicist, Nobility, BelindaP, pjw, CaDan, laptoppop, Maynard Keenan, Bananna, TheAntiLion, intricatic, gonebowling

General Forum Rules Posted

http://www.christianforums.com/t5670...ums-rules.html

sparklecat · Jul 11, 2007

cygnusx1 said:
so the teams that are making democratic rules for others are self-selecting.

thanks for the heads -up sc.

In the sense that anyone can select themselves onto the 'team,' yes. In practice, a few more people doing so might be good.

sparklecat · Jul 11, 2007

You'll also find a number of others participating in the discussion without actually editing the ruleswiki article itself.

New CF - finally...

Jacob the twister.....

Well-Known Member

Senior Contributor

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Jacob the twister.....

Senior Contributor

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Jacob the twister.....

God is not a misogynist

Senior Contributor

Well-Known Member

Jacob the twister.....

Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time

Jacob the twister.....

Senior Contributor

Senior Contributor

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency