Subduction Zone
Regular Member
You are still running away. By not addressing your lack of education in what is and what is not evidence you are running away.Run away? lol, always been right here. You can't seem to answer any other of my questions but might as well ask anyway... can you point out were I ran away?
Why don't you claim I'm wearing a clown suit now becuse I'm just into that type thing, I bite my nails, and have bad breath? It may even work to help discredit me for some. I mean once you have no argument to offer, discreditation is about all you have left...right?![]()
All of those may be true, but I could not substantiate that claim. That you are running away is ovious.
So here are the questions you still have not answered:
1)Can't prove evolution.
Wrong. That has been answered for you by me and by others many times. The fact that you do not understand what is and what is not evidence makes it a pointless exercise for us to do so.
You only keep talking about how you offered, but cannot post a run down of it here as I asked...and not of opinion, but proof. No cop outs, just do it. Too involved? I'm sorry but we can't let that be an excuse, it sounds way too much like another cop out. In order to make it believable it must be proven, whatever it takes and you know as well as I do, we would be idiots to believe it without proof.
Now you are not telling the truth. Once again, others and I have done this for you many times. It is simply an exercise in futility until you learn what evidence is.
2) Proof I do not understand "evidence".
Since you do not understand "evidence" how will you understand proof? Here is a simple question for you, your answer will tell us if you understand evidence or not:
Is the fossil record scientific evidence for the theory of evolution?
And yes, Sub actually claimed that. This is way I'm concerned about another cop out and why I keep bring up the possibility...it's not a possibility I dream up as can plainly be seen with accusations like that.
Of course I did. I would rather say that you did not understand the concept of evidence rather than saying that you are a liar. The latter is against the rules here, even if it is true.
3)Where I actually"ran away" or proof of the accusation.f
I already did that in this post.
Have you ever discussed the nature of evidence with me? You and I both know that the answer is no. That means that you are running away from a subject that scares you.
And no, I got no false hopes of getting any answers to those but I do want to start compiling a list here....let's just say for general purposes.
Really? But I answered all of them for you.
Can you be honest enough to admit that an answer that you do not like is still an answer?
Upvote
0