- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,248
- 52,665
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
What the yom does Thalidomide have to do with the earth during the Creation Week?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What the yom does Thalidomide have to do with the earth during the Creation Week?For one who calls the creation science literature the devils toolbox, one again you seem to support it.
No 57, you are talking with someone who has actually been in a radiocarbon lab. Diamonds contain absolutely no organic material unless it is contamination on the surface. Radiocarbon dating can only date organically formed material which received it 14C from the carbon cycle. Your argument is beyond silly.
You are ignoring the fact that all diamonds containing 14C are a result of "in situ" conditions, not to mention no diamonds are dated by the 14C method. They are dated from inclusions as described in the full access paper I linked for you. Your argument besides being completely baseless in completely made up."Diamonds contain absolutely no organic material unless"...they're not as old as you think.
Adam & Eve were created, having maturity without history.
They did not 'lack the ability to follow a simple instruction.'
Correct -- it did not.And that maturity didn't include a belly button, apparently?
I think the technical term for it is called disobedience.Then why didn't they follow it?
Why not? Says who? All pictures (art) I see of them have a belly button.Correct -- it did not. (include a belly button)
You are ignoring the fact that all diamonds containing 14C are a result of "in situ" conditions, not to mention no diamonds are dated by the 14C method. They are dated from inclusions as described in the full access paper I linked for you. Your argument besides being completely baseless in completely made up.
You didn't refute anything. You expressed an uninformed opinion. To refute you need to show data to the contrary of what I stated. Don't forget that I also previously linked a full paper containing data supporting what I said.I'm not ignoring it.....I completely refuted you. Move on.
You didn't refute anything. You expressed an uninformed opinion. To refute you need to show data to the contrary of what I stated. Don't forget that I also previously linked a full paper containing data supporting what I said.
You have not demonstrated how RATE quantifies young diamonds. No one including RATE has ever dated a diamond using the radiocarbon method.The opinion was quite informed. RATE pretty much explained it.
So, that means you now have to trash talk RATE. Trash talk is your best defense.
You have not demonstrated how RATE quantifies young diamonds. No one including RATE has ever dated a diamond using the radiocarbon method.
Would you like to engage me in a FORMAL DEBATE concerning the age a diamonds in the Formal debates forum?
Really? What post number was that?There is no reason to. I have already show that the C14 wasn't due to "in situ" conditions.
Really? What post number was that?
57, you have not presented any evidence whatsoever to support anything you have said about the age of diamonds in any thread. Again, I challenge you to a formal moderated debate on the subject. Will you accept?It was a previous thread. Currently I don't feel like looking for it.
57, you have not presented any evidence whatsoever to support anything you have said about the age of diamonds in any thread. Again, I challenge you to a formal moderated debate on the subject. Will you accept?
A belly button is a part of the Omphalos hypothesis.Why not? Says who? All pictures (art) I see of them have a belly button.
Yes, the argument of a deceptive creator.A belly button is a part of the Omphalos hypothesis.
In fact, Omphalos means "navel."
All pictures (art) I see of them have a belly button.
A belly button is a part of the Omphalos hypothesis.
In fact, Omphalos means "navel."
More like deceptive pictures (art).Yes, the argument of a deceptive creator.
I don't believe in the literal creation, however, if I did I see no reason why they would not have a belly button. I also see no reason for them to be full adults at time of creation either.More like deceptive pictures (art).
It would stand as a testimony as to they being created and not born.I don't believe in the literal creation, however, if I did I see no reason why they would not have a belly button.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?