Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Which is why the theory does not work. If you arrange the fossils according to their age, they do not follow the predicted pattern.Asimov said:Dude, the reason why your theory doesn't work, is that the horsey fossils found are found in different strata, meaning that each one is older than the next the further you go down.
Infinity said:Modern day horses fossils where found with the same ones you just noted
JohnR7 said:Which is why the theory does not work. If you arrange the fossils according to their age, they do not follow the predicted pattern.
It's "chink" in your armour. A chink is a small gap or slit, so a chink in your armour is the place where someone can slide a knife, sword or arrow despite your otherwise formidable defenses. A "clink" in your armour makes little sense.Infinity said:Anyways, the clink in my armor is the carbon dating of the horse legs. That is something that will take some studying on my part.
THANK YOU GRAMMAR MAN!!!michabo said:It's "chink" in your armour. A chink is a small gap or slit, so a chink in your armour is the place where someone can slide a knife, sword or arrow despite your otherwise formidable defenses. A "clink" in your armour makes little sense.
*Grammar Man flies away*
I'm afraid I still don't know what your argument is so it's hard to tell what other chinks there may be.
That pretty much sums up your theoryInfinity said:Doh!!
Evolutionists do not seem to care that their theory on the evolution of horses was falsified. They just came up with a new theory.michabo said:If true, that would be disturbing. Do you have any sources for this claim?
- First, horse evolution didn't proceed in a straight line. We now know of many other branches of horse evolution. Our familiar Equus is merely one twig on a once-flourishing bush of equine species. We only have the illusion of straight-line evolution because Equus is the only twig that survived. (See Gould's essay "Life's Little Joke" in Bully for Brontosaurus for more on this topic.)
- Second, horse evolution was not smooth and gradual. Different traits evolved at different rates, didn't always evolve together, and occasionally reversed "direction". Also, horse species did not always come into being by gradual transformation ("anagenesis") of their ancestors; instead, sometimes new species "split off" from ancestors ("cladogenesis") and then co-existed with those ancestors for some time. Some species arose gradually, others suddenly.
Yes...hence the self-correcting method of Science. If it doesn't work, find out what does!JohnR7 said:Evolutionists do not seem to care that their theory on the evolution of horses was falsified. They just came up with a new theory.
Evolution is no longer like a tree, it is now like a bush.
[/list]http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/horses/horse_evol.html
I would not consider a bush with one surviving twig something that is working, I would consider that to be contrary to nature. I should go out back with my clippers and trim a bush to look like the "bush" of evolution, so you can see just how unnatural your theory really is.Asimov said:Yes...hence the self-correcting method of Science. If it doesn't work, find out what does!
Unlike Creationism: Attack what works, to make it look like we're doin something.
The theory of evolution has not been falsified so far John. The only real issue we see is that by the discovery of more horse fossils, we had to adapt our theory into what you call "a bush", so if you think that looking at the creation of God (if that's what you believe in), and discovering more about said creation is wrong, then sue us. It's at least better then the creationist principle: keep propelling lies. WE've been over this before John, haven't you learned a single thing?JohnR7 said:Evolutionists do not seem to care that their theory on the evolution of horses was falsified. They just came up with a new theory.
Evolution is no longer like a tree, it is now like a bush.
[/list]http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/horses/horse_evol.html
Have you talked to Mr. Hovind lately?infinity said:....making a living out of it
Do you have any sources for this statement?Infinity said:Modern day horses fossils where found with the same ones you just noted
Yeah thought so. You don't.Infinity said:http://www.southplainscollege.edu/behavior_sciences/images/farside_2.jpg
Why don't you use a truckweigher to way post packages? Why don't you use a toothbrush to clean your floor? Why don't you use a small volvo to move an elephant?infinity said:Anyways, the clink in my armor is the carbon dating of the horse legs. That is something that will take some studying on my part. i just dont thing there are any of the so-called missing links in anything.
Oh, we appreciate all the work that evolutionists put into gathering all of those fossils and other data from the natural world. We just do not pay all that much attention to their opinions about what they find.Mistermystery said:discovering more about said creation is wrong, then sue us.
WE've been over this before John, haven't you learned a single thing?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?