• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

My theory on creation.

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Subject: me,
content: derogatory pedantic remarks.

If you had a problem with my terms you would have addressed my definitions with better ones. You didn't even try, that's fallacious rhetoric and it's a cruel taskmaster.


I already told you that I do not care to play semantic games. Pointing out that that is all that you were doing made that long post immaterial.

You could always try again.

By the way what makes you think that my claims were "pedantic"? Derogatory? Perhaps, but then as I pointed out earlier, you go out of your way to earn those remarks.
 
Upvote 0

pitabread

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2017
12,920
13,373
Frozen North
✟344,333.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I didn't define it, Charles Darwin did:

You do understand though that continually referring to metaphysical atheism as "Darwinian evolution" is just engaging in obfuscation on your part. It just makes it unnecessarily difficult to try to discuss anything with you.

When most people see "Darwinian evolution", they're going to be thinking biology and in particular natural selection. When you start bringing the Big Bang into it (a theory which post-dates Darwin's time), that just adds confusion to the conversation.

You could makes things easier to discuss with you, but you seem to have little desire to do so...

Random personal remarks, that's the way to take the party line.

Just calling it as I see it kiddo.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
He started with a fib:
The theory of natural selection is based on naturalistic assumptions. "The doctrine that species, including man, are descended from other species...being the result of law, and not of miraculous interposition’" (Preface, On the Origin of Species). That is mutually exclusive with creation, design or miraculous interposition of any kind.
Now he's stuck with it.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Subject: me,
content: derogatory pedantic remarks.

If you had a problem with my terms you would have addressed my definitions with better ones. You didn't even try, that's fallacious rhetoric and it's a cruel taskmaster.

I don't believe you ever answered my question.

Are the many Christians who agree with the TOE, going against what you call; Christian theism?
 
Upvote 0

tevans9129

Newbie
Apr 11, 2011
278
31
✟26,297.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
What question did I not answer? Be specific please and a post number would help.

How about this one?

I realize that some want to use their own definition of "theory" but that does not preclude others from using the common English one, do you think?
 
Upvote 0

tevans9129

Newbie
Apr 11, 2011
278
31
✟26,297.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Wait, What? Really?? It says it Right There! "The Earth" "shall" "be stable" - "the World" "not" "do moved" -how do you *plainly* read it then?

Have you ever heard of reading in context? What is the context of 1 Chronicles?

"Let tremble all the earth from before Him" - does that mean the earth is "fixed" or, in context, is the passage speaking of people? "keep straight the earth and not be shaken" Does that imply "fixed" to you? It seems to me it is to keep straight, nothing about fixed.

It seems to me that your verse is taken totally out of context of the passage which is about giving glory to the Lord, do you disagree with that?

Give to the Lord the glory due His name; Bring an offering, and come before Him. Oh, worship the Lord in the beauty of holiness! Tremble before Him, all the earth. The world also is firmly established, It shall not be moved. Let the heavens rejoice, and let the earth be glad; And let them say among the nations, “The Lord reigns.”” (1 Chronicles 16:29–31, NKJV)

Can the "earth be glad" or can all the people of the earth be glad?

SZ could not answer the questions, can you and provide scripture as it is written corroborating your answer?
 
Upvote 0

tevans9129

Newbie
Apr 11, 2011
278
31
✟26,297.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Got another scenario for you. God creates the universe including the stars, moon and earth billions of years ago and life about 6 thousand years ago.

Possible, I suppose but I would have some questions.

Was it sin that resulted in the death sentence and the curse? I believe that it was. Therefore, IF, the earth is billions of years old and if there are fossils billions of years old as some claim, then is there not a contradiction in scripture? If Adam was not there until a few thousand years ago, and if sin results in death, what caused the death of all of the fossils, if, they are billions of years old?
 
Upvote 0

tevans9129

Newbie
Apr 11, 2011
278
31
✟26,297.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You really need to pay more attention.

I am done with you SZ, it is obvious to me that you have no interest in a serious discussion, you do not honor your word and answer questions that I ask you after saying that you would and to be honest, you make accusations that you cannot prove and much of what you write is illogical and/or irrational or both, just my view.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I am done with you SZ, it is obvious to me that you have no interest in a serious discussion, you do not honor your word and answer questions that I ask you after saying that you would and to be honest, you make accusations that you cannot prove and much of what you write is illogical and/or irrational or both, just my view.


You are simply not telling the truth about me. I answered your questions. I continually showed you to be wrong. You are merely angry because I showed you to be wrong. You are the one that cannot keep his word here. But when one has false beliefs, such as you do, you have to find all sorts of excuses to keep those beliefs alive.


You have been far from honest. You have avoided answering questions. You are projecting your flaws upon others.

I will still gladly help you realize why your beliefs are false. You do realize that out of six verses that showed the Earth to be fixed and unmoving you could only find a half decent, but still unconvincing argument against one of them. You then ran away. You are clearly a coward in my view. Someone that was not afraid and really held his beliefs would not run away.
 
Upvote 0

tevans9129

Newbie
Apr 11, 2011
278
31
✟26,297.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Close to two billion Christians would disagree with you about it.
Two questions... 1) what is your definition of "Christian"? 2) Do you have verifiable data for that "close to two billion Christians" figure?

One more, I believe there are over a billion Muslims that disagree with Christianity, does that make them correct?
 
Upvote 0

Astrophile

Newbie
Aug 30, 2013
2,338
1,559
77
England
✟256,526.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Widowed
Even though you did not answer my question, I will answer this one. I absolutely do have and will until Science can provide empirical evidence of, "in the beginning," where, when and how did space, matter, energy, time and natural laws came into existence and, in what sequence. Furthermore, I will make a bold prediction that science never will provide answers to those questions from the natural laws of science. MY belief. If one does not accept Genesis, you might as well throw out the entire Bible because Genesis sets the foundation for all of scripture, IMO.
In post 159, I tried to answer this question about the origin of space, matter, energy and time. In post 168 you said,
I will be happy to engage in a serious discussion of the subject, IF, we both agree to answer all questions that we may be asked with plausible, verifiable, when possible, answers, are you interested?

I did answer your post 168 in post 178, but have received no reply. I was a bit wary of accepting conditions, since I did not want to be dragged into arguments about extraneous issues, but if you really want to engage in a serious discussion, I will join you in it, and will try to answer your questions to the best of my ability. I look forward to hearing from you.
 
Upvote 0

tevans9129

Newbie
Apr 11, 2011
278
31
✟26,297.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
That's called an ad hominem fallacy, you argue little else. You've abandoned the subject matter and made it all about personal remarks. That's when I know I got you, when you have nothing else. Welcome to my ignore list.

Amen to that !! It seems to be a typical ploy when one cannot offer verifiable evidence supporting their argument.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
In post 159, I tried to answer this question about the origin of space, matter, energy and time. In post 168 you said,


I did answer your post 168 in post 178, but have received no reply. I was a bit wary of accepting conditions, since I did not want to be dragged into arguments about extraneous issues, but if you really want to engage in a serious discussion, I will join you in it, and will try to answer your questions to the best of my ability. I look forward to hearing from you.


Sadly when one does answer his questions fully and honestly he then accuses of you of being dishonest if you show him to be wrong. At least that was my experience with him.

Plus getting him to fully answer questions is like pulling teeth.
 
Upvote 0

tevans9129

Newbie
Apr 11, 2011
278
31
✟26,297.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Desperate? I'm little more the bored watching you beat up on an argument I never made.



First of all evolution is the change of alleles (traits) in populations over time, not the a priori assumption of universal common ancestry by exclusively naturalistic means. That particular fallacy is called equivocation.



The Genesis account of creation defines 'creation' perfectly well.

Created


The phrase, 'heaven and the earth', is a Hebrew expression meaning the universe. All we really get from this passage is that the cosmos and earth were created, 'in the beginning'. The perspective of creation week is from the surface of the earth, starting with the Spirit of God hovering over the deep (Gen. 1:2). In the chapter there are three words used for God's work in creation. The first is 'created' ('bara' H1254) a very precise term used only of God.

Create ‘bara’ (H1254) - 'This verb has profound theological significance, since it has only God as it’s subject. Only God can create in the sense implied by bara. The verb expresses the idea of creation out of nothing...(Vines Expository Dictionary)​

Made
It is used once to describe the creation of the universe (Gen 1:1), then again to describe the creation of life (Gen 1:21). Finally, in the closing verses, it is used three times for the creation of Adam and Eve (Gen. 1:27). The word translated, 'made' (asah 6213) , has a much broader range of meaning and is used to speak of the creation of the 'firmament' (Gen 1:7), the sun, moon and stars (Gen 1:16), procreation where offspring are made 'after his/their kind' (Gen 1:25) and as a general reference to creation in it's vast array (Gen 1:31).

Made ‘asah’(H6213) "A primitive root; to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest application" (Gen 1:7, Gen 1:16, Gen 1:25, Gen 1:31, Isa. 41:20, 43:7, 45:7, 12, Amos 4:13). (Strong’s Dictionary). "The verb, which occurs over 2600 times in the Old Testament, is used as a synonym for “create” only about 60 times…only when asah is parallel to bara…can we be sure that it implies creation." (Vine 52).​

Set
Then there is a third term when God 'set' (nathan H2414), the lights of the sun, moon and stars so that their light is regularly visible from the surface of the earth. In this way the narrative shifts from the very precise word for 'created' to the more general 'made', and then the much broader use of 'set'.

Set (nathan H5414) A primitive root; to give, used with greatest latitude of application (Gen 1:17, Gen 9:13, Gen 18:8, Gen 30:40, Gen 41:41). Elsewhere translated ‘put’, ‘make’, ‘cause’, etc.​

The creation account has great significance for the rest of Scripture and how these terms are used in the original and their natural context is essential to really following the text as it was intended to be understood.

God created the universe (Gen. 1:1), life in general (1:21) and man in particular (Gen. 1:27). The term 'bara' is used once for original creation, once for the creation of life and three times for the creation of Adam and Eve. God also created Israel:

Especially striking is the use of bara in Isaiah 40-65. Out of 49 occurrences of the verb in the Old Testament, 20 are in these chapters. Because Isaiah writes prophetically to the Jews in Exile, he speaks of comfort based upon God’s past benefits and blessings to His people. Isaiah especially wants to show that, since Yahweh is the Creator, His is able to deliver His people from captivity. The God of Israel has created all things: “I have made the earth, and created (bara) man upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens and all their host have I commanded” (Isa. 45:12). The gods of Babylon are impotent nonentities (Isa. 44:12-20; 46:1-7), and so Israel can expect God to triumph by effecting a new creation, (Isa.: 43:16-21; 65:17-25). (Vine's Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words: By W. E. Vine, Merrill Unger)



The operative word was history, and you are obvious.



Unless of course, they were acquired from God. This account of creation was literally written in stone, it's part of the Ten Commandments and the whole reason for the Sabbath.

For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. (Gen. 20:11)
God created life which is distinctly different from pagan myths, when tracing things back to original creation they invariably ended up with an elemental deity, earth, air, fire or water. This Babylonian myth indicates two water elementals, fresh and salt water apparently:

When in the height heaven was not named,
And the earth beneath did not yet bear a name,
And the primeval Apsu, who begat them,
And chaos, Tiamut, the mother of them both
Their waters were mingled together,
And no field was formed, no marsh was to be seen;
When of the gods none had been called into being. (Enuma Elish, the Epic of Creation)​

Notice at creation the 'gods' didn't even exist.

Obviously the doctrine of creation is the heart of the emphasis but the text also describes creation as being largely a matter of separation. The light from darkness, waters above and below, land and sea. The word (בָּדַל badal H914) is used five times in the creation account then not used again until Exodus, 'The vail shall divide (H914) unto you between the holy place and the most holy' (Exo. 26:33). This is no coincidence, the idea of sanctification is literally the idea of separation, something set aside for God's exclusive use.

Great response and absolute facts, sadly, some will just ignore it and go off on a tangent.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Amen to that !! It seems to be a typical ploy when one cannot offer verifiable evidence supporting their argument.

Sorry, but Mark merely uses the names of logical fallacies, he does not understand them. When challenged he was not able to make his case for any ad homs, for any strawman arguments. He is like many creationists that make endless logical fallacies. He only learned the terms, he did not learn what they mean or how to apply them. Plus notice how when he is beaten he puts someone on ignore.

Putting someone on ignore when they constantly defeat you is the favorite tactic of too many creationists here.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Great response and absolute facts, sadly, some will just ignore it and go off on a tangent.

Nope, he was demonstrably wrong, again. He keeps making an obvious error and will not own up to it.

But then you have demonstrated that the truth is the last thing that you care about.
 
Upvote 0